Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a muscle mass evaluating tool and prognostic indicator for hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis.

Wen-He Zheng, Yi-Bing Zhu, Yan Yao, Hui-Bin Huang
Author Information
  1. Wen-He Zheng: Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
  2. Yi-Bing Zhu: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  3. Yan Yao: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  4. Hui-Bin Huang: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Objective: Sarcopenia is a syndrome of decreased muscle mass and deficits in muscle strength and physical function. We aimed to investigate the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and sarcopenia and the prognostic value of CCR in hospitalized patients.
Materials and methods: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database up to August 25, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between CCR and skeletal muscle [computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle (CTASM), muscle strength, and physical performance], prognosis and important clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults. The pooled correlation coefficient, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and hazard ratio (HR) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 38 studies with 20,362 patients were eligible. These studies were of moderate to high quality. Our results showed that CCR was significant correlations with all CTASM types (Fisher's ranged from 0.35 to 0.5; values ranged from < 0.01 to 0.01), handgrip strength (Fisher's = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.45; < 0.001) and gait speed (Fisher's = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.21-0.30; < 0.001). The ROC curves suggested that CCR had good diagnostic efficacy (0.689; 95% CI, 0.632-0.746; < 0.01) for sarcopenia. CCR can reliably predict mortality in hospitalized patients, which was confirmed by regression analysis of CCR as both continuous (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84; < 0.01) and categorical variables (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.58-2.66; < 0.0001). In addition, less evidence showed that higher CCR was independently associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, less nutritional risk, and decreased complications in hospitalized patients.
Conclusion: CCR could be a simple, economical, and effective screening tool for sarcopenia in hospitalized patients, and it is a helpful prognostic factor for mortality and other important clinical outcomes.
Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0097/, identifier INPLASY202290097.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Apr;77(4):509-516.e1 [PMID: 33098923]
  2. Biomed Rep. 2020 Mar;12(3):89-98 [PMID: 32042417]
  3. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Dec 24;16:3513-3524 [PMID: 34992359]
  4. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Jun;13(3):1800-1810 [PMID: 35297568]
  5. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 May;139:52-58 [PMID: 29496508]
  6. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Sep;39(7):787-822 [PMID: 26287016]
  7. Thorax. 2019 Nov;74(11):1091-1098 [PMID: 31431489]
  8. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16881 [PMID: 34413410]
  9. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(3):335-339 [PMID: 33575725]
  10. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1148-1161 [PMID: 30498820]
  11. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 [PMID: 3802833]
  12. Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Mar 01;17:211-221 [PMID: 35256845]
  13. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;25(9):603-5 [PMID: 20652370]
  14. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Aug;43(6):780-788 [PMID: 30561031]
  15. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16863 [PMID: 34413438]
  16. Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):538-547 [PMID: 30648340]
  17. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Apr;13(2):945-954 [PMID: 35170256]
  18. Eur J Radiol. 2021 Dec;145:109943 [PMID: 34839215]
  19. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Nov;9(2): [PMID: 34732398]
  20. Brain Behav. 2019 Dec;9(12):e01462 [PMID: 31701661]
  21. Clin Nutr. 2019 Jun;38(3):1362-1367 [PMID: 29921462]
  22. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1087-1098 [PMID: 30715595]
  23. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Apr 08;17:781-789 [PMID: 35422619]
  24. Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2435-2441 [PMID: 31732290]
  25. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):1260 [PMID: 31988356]
  26. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):207 [PMID: 35287579]
  27. Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 25;9:828880 [PMID: 35284461]
  28. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jun;32(6):1454-1462 [PMID: 35256230]
  29. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2022 Mar 30;31(1):9-16 [PMID: 35318289]
  30. BMC Pulm Med. 2022 May 23;22(1):203 [PMID: 35606777]
  31. Nutrition. 2021 Feb;82:111032 [PMID: 33172686]
  32. Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jul;6(7):1699-1710 [PMID: 35238487]
  33. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E889-E896 [PMID: 34043281]
  34. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):341 [PMID: 35439963]
  35. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jan;51(1):79-83 [PMID: 30361963]
  36. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Apr;20(4):388-389 [PMID: 32239605]
  37. Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Feb;72:9-14 [PMID: 31708357]
  38. Immunol Cell Biol. 2015 May-Jun;93(5):442-51 [PMID: 25643616]
  39. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 27;9(10): [PMID: 32992530]
  40. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 May 16;16:21 [PMID: 28523252]
  41. Hepatol Res. 2020 Jun;50(6):704-714 [PMID: 32061107]
  42. Immunol Lett. 2018 Apr;196:80-90 [PMID: 29355583]
  43. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 19;17(5):R206 [PMID: 24050662]
  44. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 5;10(1):e018554 [PMID: 33372526]
  45. Clin Transplant. 2018 Mar;32(3):e13182 [PMID: 29274246]
  46. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600 [PMID: 24108501]
  47. Nutrition. 2021 Jan;81:110895 [PMID: 32739656]
  48. Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):897-905 [PMID: 25559437]
  49. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010 Jan;13(1):1-7 [PMID: 19915458]
  50. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(7):878-882 [PMID: 34409965]
  51. Nutrients. 2022 Apr 07;14(8): [PMID: 35458101]
  52. Hepatol Res. 2019 Feb;49(2):153-163 [PMID: 30005446]
  53. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 19;22(1):26 [PMID: 35045814]
  54. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):e23-e29 [PMID: 27611976]
  55. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Aug;13(4):2064-2072 [PMID: 35478277]
  56. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]
  57. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41 [PMID: 20171303]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00CCRhospitalizedmuscle95%<patientsCIratiosarcopenia01strengthcreatinine/cystatinCprognosticstudiesHRFisher'smortalitydecreasedmassphysicalrelationship25skeletalCTASMimportantclinicaloutcomesROCcurvesshowedranged=001lesstoolmeta-analysisObjective:SarcopeniasyndromedeficitsfunctionaimedinvestigatevalueMaterialsmethods:searchedrelevantPubMedEMBASECochraneDatabaseAugust2022Meta-analysesperformedevaluate[computedtomography-assessedperformance]prognosisadultspooledcorrelationcoefficientareareceiveroperatingcharacteristichazardtogetherconfidenceintervalsCIscalculatedalsoconductedsubgroupanalysesexploresourcesheterogeneityResults:total3820362eligiblemoderatehighqualityresultssignificantcorrelationstypes355valueshandgrip3932-045gaitspeed21-030suggestedgooddiagnosticefficacy689632-0746canreliablypredictconfirmedregressionanalysiscontinuous7872-084categoricalvariables205158-2660001additionevidencehigherindependentlyassociatedshorterdurationmechanicalventilationreducedlengthstayintensivecareunithospitalnutritionalriskcomplicationsConclusion:simpleeconomicaleffectivescreeninghelpfulfactorSystematicreviewregistration:https://inplasycom/inplasy-2022-9-0097/identifierINPLASY202290097Serumevaluatingindicatorpatients:

Similar Articles

Cited By