Portuguese version of Bern Illegitimates Task Scale: adaptation and evidence of validity.

Paula C Neves, Cláudia Andrade, Rui Paixão, José Tomás da Silva
Author Information
  1. Paula C Neves: Coimbra Education School, Research Group in Social and Human Sciences (NICSH), Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. pneves@esec.pt. ORCID
  2. Cláudia Andrade: Coimbra Education School, Research Group in Social and Human Sciences (NICSH), Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. ORCID
  3. Rui Paixão: Centre for Social Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. ORCID
  4. José Tomás da Silva: Centre for Social Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new element for job stress called Illegitimate Tasks has been investigated in recent years, along with stress as an offense to self-theory. Illegitimate tasks are those that are either needless or unrelated to the employee's role and can be categorized as unreasonable tasks and unnecessary tasks.
METHODS: This study aimed to adapt the Bern Illegitimate Tasks Scale to Portuguese and provide evidence of its validity, through a confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 472 workers from different sectors.
RESULTS: The internal consistency, of the whole scale, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.923 and 0.902 and 0.928 for the unnecessary tasks and, for unreasonable tasks subscales respectively. The confirmatory analysis supported a two-factor model and showed good to very good indexes of fit (CFI = 0.985; TLI = 0.997; SRMR = 0.035; RMSEA = 0.171).
DISCUSSION: The Portuguese version of the Bern Illegitimate Tasks Scale presents very good psychometric properties for the intended measurement goals and can now be used in research with Portuguese speaking samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Occup Health Sci. 2019;3(3):205-238 [PMID: 32647746]
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91 [PMID: 11124735]
  3. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):241-255 [PMID: 29683712]
  4. Work Stress. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):32-56 [PMID: 25892839]
  5. Psychol Rep. 2020 Oct;123(5):1635-1662 [PMID: 31510875]
  6. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 17;12:593870 [PMID: 33815195]
  7. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1818 [PMID: 27917145]
  8. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2093-2106 [PMID: 33829574]
  9. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:739593 [PMID: 34777127]

MeSH Term

Humans
Portugal
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Psychometrics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IllegitimatetasksTasksBernPortugueseScale0goodstresscanunreasonableunnecessaryevidencevalidityconfirmatoryanalysisversionpropertiesBACKGROUND:newelementjobcalledinvestigatedrecentyearsalongoffenseself-theoryeitherneedlessunrelatedemployee'srolecategorizedMETHODS:studyaimedadaptprovidefactorsample472workersdifferentsectorsRESULTS:internalconsistencywholescalemeasuredCronbach'salpha923902928subscalesrespectivelysupportedtwo-factormodelshowedindexesfitCFI = 0985TLI = 0997SRMR = 0035RMSEA = 0171DISCUSSION:presentspsychometricintendedmeasurementgoalsnowusedresearchspeakingsamplesIllegitimatesTaskScale:adaptationPsychometricValidity

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)