Non-glandular findings on breast ultrasound. Part II: a pictorial review of chest wall lesions.

Antonio Corvino, Orlando Catalano, Carlo Varelli, Giulio Cocco, Andrea Delli Pizzi, Fabio Corvino, Corrado Caiazzo, Domenico Tafuri, Martina Caruso
Author Information
  1. Antonio Corvino: Movement Sciences and Wellbeing Department, University of Naples "Parthenope", Via Medina 40, 80133, Naples, Italy. an.cor@hotmail.it. ORCID
  2. Orlando Catalano: Radiology Unit, Varelli Diagnostic Institute, Naples, Italy.
  3. Carlo Varelli: Radiology Unit, Varelli Diagnostic Institute, Naples, Italy.
  4. Giulio Cocco: Unit of Ultrasound in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
  5. Andrea Delli Pizzi: Departiment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
  6. Fabio Corvino: Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  7. Corrado Caiazzo: Radiology Unit, PSP Corso Vittorio Emanuele ASL Napoli 1, Naples, Italy.
  8. Domenico Tafuri: Movement Sciences and Wellbeing Department, University of Naples "Parthenope", Via Medina 40, 80133, Naples, Italy.
  9. Martina Caruso: Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Abstract

The breast ultrasound (US) field-of-view (FOV) includes glandular parenchyma as well as tissues located anterior to and posterior to it, up to pleural line. For that, it is possible to incidentally identify lesions unrelated to breast parenchyma during screening or diagnostic US; sometimes a palpable lump may be the reason of the imaging exam. Furthermore, abnormality related to chest wall are easier and more accurate detected after mastectomy. Hence, radiologists should know the US appearance of lesions which may develop from all tissues present in this region and displayed in the US FOV, without focusing only on glandular abnormalities while performing the exam. This is the second of a two-part series on non-glandular breast lesions; in detail, part two provide an overview of US appearance, differential diagnosis, and pitfalls of chest wall lesions. They may have an infectious, traumatic, inflammatory etiology or be benign or malignant neoplasms. The US role in the assessment of chest wall abnormalities is limited, usually computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance are requested as second-level imaging exams to characterize and to assess better their relationship with surrounding structures because of larger and panoramic view. Finally, US could be useful to guide biopsy.

Keywords

References

  1. Radiographics. 1999 May-Jun;19(3):617-37 [PMID: 10336192]
  2. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan - Feb;59(4):380-388 [PMID: 28062268]
  3. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(8):1131-9 [PMID: 9372561]
  4. Insights Imaging. 2015 Dec;6(6):729-40 [PMID: 26475741]
  5. Radiographics. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):1285-306 [PMID: 27494286]
  6. Radiographics. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(7):1959-72 [PMID: 22084181]
  7. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Sep;95(5):319-24 [PMID: 19586809]
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):e83 [PMID: 22717835]
  9. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;39(1):30-6 [PMID: 19931111]
  10. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004 Nov-Dec;32(9):500-10 [PMID: 15558616]
  11. Ultraschall Med. 1997 Oct;18(5):214-9 [PMID: 9441389]
  12. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):18-25 [PMID: 22541866]
  13. Radiographics. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):1491-508 [PMID: 14615560]
  14. J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Jul;18(7):513-7 [PMID: 10400055]
  15. Injury. 2004 Jun;35(6):562-6 [PMID: 15135274]
  16. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Dec;169(6):1695-8 [PMID: 9393192]
  17. Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1546-55 [PMID: 15078773]
  18. Thorac Surg Clin. 2004 Feb;14(1):15-23 [PMID: 15382305]
  19. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Jan;27(1):125-38 [PMID: 18096738]
  20. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000 Jun;21(3):205-13 [PMID: 10994689]
  21. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Dec;41(12):3137-3144 [PMID: 35920315]
  22. Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;25(1):16-24 [PMID: 22294939]
  23. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Dec;34(12):2253-60 [PMID: 26543170]
  24. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1692-1705 [PMID: 30409330]
  25. Chest. 2008 Apr;133(4):881-6 [PMID: 17951616]
  26. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2008 Jan;65(1):64-8 [PMID: 18368942]
  27. Emerg Radiol. 2010 Nov;17(6):473-7 [PMID: 20652719]
  28. Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):e1 [PMID: 11796913]
  29. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Feb;170(2):459-63 [PMID: 9456964]
  30. Breast J. 2004 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-3 [PMID: 15009044]
  31. Radiographics. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):1477-90 [PMID: 14615559]

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Thoracic Wall
Breast Neoplasms
Mastectomy
Ultrasonography, Mammary
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0USlesionswallbreastchestultrasoundmayFOVglandularparenchymatissuesimagingexamappearanceabnormalitiesdiagnosisfield-of-viewincludeswelllocatedanteriorposteriorpleurallinepossibleincidentallyidentifyunrelatedscreeningdiagnosticsometimespalpablelumpreasonFurthermoreabnormalityrelatedeasieraccuratedetectedmastectomyHenceradiologistsknowdeveloppresentregiondisplayedwithoutfocusingperformingsecondtwo-partseriesnon-glandulardetailparttwoprovideoverviewdifferentialpitfallsinfectioustraumaticinflammatoryetiologybenignmalignantneoplasmsroleassessmentlimitedusuallycomputedtomographyand/ormagneticresonancerequestedsecond-levelexamscharacterizeassessbetterrelationshipsurroundingstructureslargerpanoramicviewFinallyusefulguidebiopsyNon-glandularfindingsPartII:pictorialreviewBreastCharacterizationChestDifferentialPitfalls

Similar Articles

Cited By