Elaborations and Denials in Children's Responses to Yes-No Any/Some Questions in Forensic Interviews.

Zsofia A Szojka, Hayden M Henderson, Jina Hur, Hannah Siepmann, Thomas D Lyon
Author Information
  1. Zsofia A Szojka: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ORCID
  2. Hayden M Henderson: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  3. Jina Hur: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  4. Hannah Siepmann: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  5. Thomas D Lyon: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

This study examined 379 4- to 12-year-old children's answers to any/some and other yes-no questions in forensic interviews about sexual abuse ( = 10,041). Yes-no questions that include the terms any/some (e.g., "Did he say anything?") often implicitly ask for elaboration when the answer is yes ("What did he say?"). However, children may give unelaborated responses to yes-no questions, fail to recognize implicit requests, and falsely respond "no." As predicted, children gave more wh- elaborations in response to any/some questions than other yes-no questions, but younger children elaborated less often than older children. Also as predicted, children responded "no" more often to any/some questions than to other yes-no questions, and more often to "any" than to "some" questions. "No" responses were also more common when children were asked potentially vague anything/something questions and else/other/different questions. The results highlight the potential risks of asking children any/some questions.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2014 Jan 1;20(1):19-30 [PMID: 25242881]
  2. Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):775-88 [PMID: 25393547]
  3. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Apr;88(2):195-206 [PMID: 12731704]
  4. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP12375-NP12397 [PMID: 33719716]
  5. Legal Criminol Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(2):197-212 [PMID: 28890662]
  6. Law Hum Behav. 2016 Apr;40(2):107-17 [PMID: 26844909]
  7. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):200-210 [PMID: 31555043]
  8. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Oct;71(5):926-34 [PMID: 14516241]
  9. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):191-199 [PMID: 28652686]
  10. Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Jul;30(7):753-69 [PMID: 16846642]
  11. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):780-788 [PMID: 25866442]
  12. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Aug;24(3):379-392 [PMID: 30479470]
  13. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1429-33 [PMID: 17674111]
  14. Scand J Psychol. 2006 Apr;47(2):109-19 [PMID: 16542353]
  15. Child Maltreat. 2023 Feb;28(1):55-65 [PMID: 35025692]

Grants

  1. R01 HD087685/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD101617/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Child Abuse, Sexual

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0questionschildrenany/someyes-nooftenforensicinterviewsabuseresponsespredictedchildstudyexamined3794-12-year-oldchildren'sanswerssexual=10041Yes-noincludetermseg"Didsayanything?"implicitlyaskelaborationansweryes"Whatsay?"Howevermaygiveunelaboratedfailrecognizeimplicitrequestsfalselyrespond"no"gavewh-elaborationsresponseyoungerelaboratedlessolderAlsoresponded"no""any""some""No"alsocommonaskedpotentiallyvagueanything/somethingelse/other/differentresultshighlightpotentialrisksaskingElaborationsDenialsChildren'sResponsesYes-NoAny/SomeQuestionsForensicInterviewswitnesses

Similar Articles

Cited By