Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alejandro E Contreras, Facundo Ledesma, Alejandro R Peirone, Ernesto Juaneda, Victor Defago, Eduardo Cuestas
Author Information
Alejandro E Contreras: Department of Cardiology, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba/Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina. Electronic address: aletreras@hotmail.com.
Facundo Ledesma: Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Alejandro R Peirone: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Ernesto Juaneda: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Victor Defago: Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Eduardo Cuestas: Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of percutaneous occlusion among patients with sufficient and deficient rims. METHODS: A systematic review of all articles published in the Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as a measure of effect of the combination of studies. I with 95% CI was estimated to assess study heterogeneity. For the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used. RESULTS: The systematic search identified ten studies which included 4355 patients; 2661 of those had sufficient rim and the remaining 1694 patients showed some rim deficiency. Implant failure rate was 4.13% CI 95% 3.53-4.72%. Compared to frequency of failures in the group with a deficient rim (5.43% CI 95% 4.35-6.50%), implant failure in patients with a sufficient rim was significantly lower (3.30% CI 95% 2.62-3.97%), OR 2.27 CI 1.34-3.83 (p 0.002). The combined adverse events were 5.19% CI 95% 4.22-6.35% vs 2.7% CI 95% 2.08-3.31% in the deficient vs sufficient rim groups respectively (OR 2.21 CI 0.93-5.29; p 0.07). Implant failures and adverse events were more frequent in patients with posterior inferior rim deficiency. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting a posteroinferior rim deficiency are associated to both, an increased incidence of closure failure and a combined adverse events occurrence. More studies on posterior rim deficiency are necessary to ensure the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous approach.
