Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Predicts Disability Rating Scale in Acute Rehabilitation of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Susan Onami, Duc Tran, Christine Koh-Pham, Wendy Shih, Bradley Chi, Jiahao Peng, David Shavlik, Pramil Singh, Joseph Giacino
Author Information
  1. Susan Onami: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
  2. Duc Tran: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
  3. Christine Koh-Pham: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA. Electronic address: ckohpham@llu.edu.
  4. Wendy Shih: Research Consulting Group, Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA.
  5. Bradley Chi: Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY.
  6. Jiahao Peng: Research Consulting Group, Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA.
  7. David Shavlik: Research Consulting Group, Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA.
  8. Pramil Singh: Research Consulting Group, Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA.
  9. Joseph Giacino: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charleston, MA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognostic value of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) in predicting disability outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the Disability Rating Scale (DRS).
DESIGN: Secondary analysis including linear and logistic regressions were performed.
SETTING: Data were collected in a previous clinical trial.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-four participants across 3 countries (N=184).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability Rating Scales.
RESULTS: Analyses showed an inverse relation between CRS-R scores obtained at baseline and change in DRS scores at 6 weeks. Similarly, changes in CRS-R scores between baseline and 4 weeks were also found to have an inverse relation to change in DRS scores at 6 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study generates a tool that can be used to predict the probability that a patient with severe traumatic brain injury lands in 1 of 3 disability categories. The CRS-R may be useful in prognostication of disability in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):914-919 [PMID: 29428346]
  2. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):746-54 [PMID: 15827927]
  3. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;72(11):897-901 [PMID: 1929808]
  4. BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 21;9:35 [PMID: 19622138]
  5. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Feb;68(2):94-7 [PMID: 3813863]
  6. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;51(5):627-34 [PMID: 24603937]
  7. Neurology. 1993 Aug;43(8):1465-7 [PMID: 8350997]
  8. Brain Inj. 2008 Sep;22(10):786-92 [PMID: 18787989]
  9. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):13-6 [PMID: 8664760]
  10. Neurology. 2010 Jul 20;75(3):239-45 [PMID: 20554941]
  11. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Nov;21(11):1024-37 [PMID: 17984154]
  12. Brain. 2017 Sep 1;140(9):2399-2414 [PMID: 29050383]
  13. J Adv Nurs. 2011 May;67(5):1129-41 [PMID: 21231953]
  14. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):349-56 [PMID: 20142758]
  15. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(4):293-8 [PMID: 15671583]
  16. Nature. 2007 Aug 2;448(7153):600-3 [PMID: 17671503]
  17. Brain Inj. 2018;32(6):730-734 [PMID: 29482376]
  18. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88 [PMID: 19818896]
  19. Brain Inj. 2014;28(13-14):1744-7 [PMID: 25264811]
  20. Neurology. 2013 Jan 29;80(5):464-70 [PMID: 23303855]
  21. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):408-16 [PMID: 10945425]
  22. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Jan;66(1):35-7 [PMID: 3966866]
  23. Brain Inj. 2013;27(9):1000-7 [PMID: 23730948]
  24. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Mar;93(3):428-33.e12 [PMID: 22277244]
  25. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1295-1300.e4 [PMID: 26944708]
  26. Ann Neurol. 2006 Dec;60(6):744-5; author reply 745 [PMID: 16847951]
  27. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(4):299-304 [PMID: 15671584]
  28. Phys Ther. 1984 Sep;64(9):1357-60 [PMID: 6473516]
  29. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jun 1;30(11):970-4 [PMID: 23230909]
  30. Brain Inj. 2018;32(2):242-246 [PMID: 29182381]
  31. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Mar;94(3):527-535.e1 [PMID: 23127303]
  32. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4 [PMID: 4136544]
  33. Neurology. 2010 Jul 20;75(3):246-52 [PMID: 20554940]
  34. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53 [PMID: 11839831]
  35. BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):68 [PMID: 30999877]
  36. Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):585-93 [PMID: 16178024]
  37. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1855-60 [PMID: 23732164]
  38. Funct Neurol. 2011 Jan-Mar;26(1):25-30 [PMID: 21693085]
  39. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118-23 [PMID: 7073452]
  40. Brain Inj. 2011;25(5):488-95 [PMID: 21401371]
  41. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):819-26 [PMID: 22375973]
  42. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9 [PMID: 15605342]
  43. J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Oct;62(5):535-541 [PMID: 30182649]
  44. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2335-41 [PMID: 25010536]
  45. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):156-63 [PMID: 8311671]
  46. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;97(3):490-492.e1 [PMID: 26342571]
  47. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1795-813 [PMID: 21112421]

Grants

  1. 90DPTB0027/ACL HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Coma
Recovery of Function
Brain Injuries
Prognosis
Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Glasgow Coma Scale

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CRS-RbraininjuryDisabilityscoresComadisabilityseveretraumaticRatingDRSweeksRecoveryScale-RevisedpatientsScale3inverserelationbaselinechange6RehabilitationTraumaticscaleOBJECTIVE:exploreprognosticvaluepredictingoutcomesusingDESIGN:SecondaryanalysisincludinglinearlogisticregressionsperformedSETTING:DatacollectedpreviousclinicaltrialPARTICIPANTS:Onehundredeighty-fourparticipantsacrosscountriesN=184MAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:ScalesRESULTS:AnalysesshowedobtainedSimilarlychanges4alsofoundCONCLUSIONS:studygeneratestoolcanusedpredictprobabilitypatientlands1categoriesmayusefulprognosticationPredictsAcuteSevereBrainInjuryrecoveryrevisedratingPrognostication

Similar Articles

Cited By