Travel scenario workshops for geographical accessibility modeling of health services: A transdisciplinary evaluation study.

Lotte Molenaar, Fleur Hierink, Michel Brun, Jean-Pierre Monet, Nicolas Ray
Author Information
  1. Lotte Molenaar: Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Fleur Hierink: Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  3. Michel Brun: Technical Division, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, NY, United States.
  4. Jean-Pierre Monet: Technical Division, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, NY, United States.
  5. Nicolas Ray: Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

Introduction: Limited geographical access to quality Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) is a major driver of high Maternal Mortality. Geographic access to EmONC facilities is identified by the global community as a critical issue for reducing Maternal Mortality and is proposed as a global indicator by the Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM) initiative. Geographic accessibility models can provide insight into the population that lacks adequate access and on the optimal distribution of facilities and resources. Travel scenarios (i.e., modes and speed of transport) used to compute geographical access to healthcare are a key input to these models and should approximate reality as much as possible. This study explores strategies to optimize and harmonize knowledge elicitation practices for developing travel scenarios.
Methods: Knowledge elicitation practices for travel scenario workshops (TSW) were studied in 14 African and South-Asian countries where the United Nations Population Fund supported ministries of health and governments in strengthening networks of EmONC facilities. This was done through a mixed methods evaluation study following a transdisciplinary approach, applying the four phases of the Interactive Learning and Action methodology: exploration, in-depth, integration, and prioritization and action planning. Data was collected in November 2020-June 2021 and involved scoping activities, stakeholder identification, semi-structured interviews ( = 9), an evaluation survey ( = 31), and two co-creating focus group discussions ( = 8).
Results: Estimating realistic travel speeds and limited time for the workshop were considered as the largest barriers. The identified opportunities were inclusively prioritized, whereby preparation; a favorable composition of attendees; validation practices; and evaluation were anticipated to be the most promising improvement strategies, explaining their central place on the co-developed initial standard operating procedure (SOP) for future TSWs. Mostly extensive preparation-both on the side of the organization and the attendees-was anticipated to address nearly all of the identified TSW challenges.
Conclusion: This study showed that the different identified stakeholders had contradicting, complementing and overlapping ideas about strategies to optimize and harmonize TSWs. Yet, an initial SOP was inclusively developed, emphasizing practices for before, during and after each TSW. This SOP is not only relevant in the context of the UNFPA EmONC development approach, but also for monitoring the newly launched EPMM indicator and even in the broader field of geographic accessibility modeling.

Keywords

References

  1. Syst Synth Biol. 2013 Sep;7(3):127-38 [PMID: 24432150]
  2. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7): [PMID: 34301676]
  3. Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70 [PMID: 24853604]
  4. Int J Health Geogr. 2012 Sep 17;11:40 [PMID: 22984920]
  5. Int J Health Geogr. 2008 May 21;7:22 [PMID: 18495025]
  6. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):430-445 [PMID: 28839113]
  7. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5): [PMID: 35589152]
  8. Eval Program Plann. 2009 Feb;32(1):31-42 [PMID: 19004496]
  9. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e045891 [PMID: 34330852]
  10. Psychophysiology. 2017 May;54(5):706-712 [PMID: 28139018]
  11. Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2164-2175 [PMID: 27642022]
  12. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 17;4(Suppl 5):e001568 [PMID: 31478017]
  13. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0217976 [PMID: 31314809]
  14. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33 [PMID: 25103301]
  15. Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1835-1838 [PMID: 32989313]
  16. BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Nov 25;2(4):e000376 [PMID: 29225948]
  17. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12): [PMID: 33355267]
  18. JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 8;5(2):e19243 [PMID: 33555261]
  19. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e342-e350 [PMID: 29396220]
  20. World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2123-2130 [PMID: 32274536]
  21. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e039138 [PMID: 33148747]
  22. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):67 [PMID: 28427337]
  23. Nature. 2018 Jan 18;553(7688):333-336 [PMID: 29320477]
  24. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jan;22(1):101-110 [PMID: 28780684]
  25. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245297 [PMID: 33411850]
  26. Ground Water. 2008 Mar-Apr;46(2):174-82 [PMID: 18194321]
  27. Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18 [PMID: 23496984]
  28. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Apr 09;13(1):e1-e7 [PMID: 33881333]
  29. Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Dec 16;7:63 [PMID: 19087277]

MeSH Term

Infant, Newborn
Pregnancy
Female
Humans
Health Services Accessibility
Travel
Emergency Medical Services
Health Facilities
Maternal Mortality

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0accessEmONCidentifiedaccessibilitystudypracticestravelevaluationgeographicalmaternalfacilitiesstrategiesscenarioTSWhealth=SOPmortalityGeographicglobalindicatorEPMMmodelsTravelscenariosoptimizeharmonizeelicitationworkshopstransdisciplinaryapproachinclusivelyanticipatedinitialTSWsgeographicmodelingIntroduction:LimitedqualityEmergencyObstetricNewbornCaremajordriverhighcommunitycriticalissuereducingproposedEndingPreventableMaternalMortalityinitiativecanprovideinsightpopulationlacksadequateoptimaldistributionresourcesiemodesspeedtransportusedcomputehealthcarekeyinputapproximaterealitymuchpossibleexploresknowledgedevelopingMethods:Knowledgestudied14AfricanSouth-AsiancountriesUnitedNationsPopulationFundsupportedministriesgovernmentsstrengtheningnetworksdonemixedmethodsfollowingapplyingfourphasesInteractiveLearningActionmethodology:explorationin-depthintegrationprioritizationactionplanningDatacollectedNovember2020-June2021involvedscopingactivitiesstakeholderidentificationsemi-structuredinterviews9survey31twoco-creatingfocusgroupdiscussions8Results:Estimatingrealisticspeedslimitedtimeworkshopconsideredlargestbarriersopportunitiesprioritizedwherebypreparationfavorablecompositionattendeesvalidationpromisingimprovementexplainingcentralplaceco-developedstandardoperatingprocedurefutureMostlyextensivepreparation-bothsideorganizationattendees-wasaddressnearlychallengesConclusion:showeddifferentstakeholderscontradictingcomplementingoverlappingideasYetdevelopedemphasizingrelevantcontextUNFPAdevelopmentalsomonitoringnewlylaunchedevenbroaderfieldservices:emergencyobstetriccareinteractivelearning

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)