Implementation of a Knowledge Management System in Mental Health and Addictions: Mixed Methods Case Study.

Jill Chorney, Debbie Johnson Emberly, Jennifer Jeffrey, Amos Hundert, Onur Pakkanlilar, Sabina Abidi, Alexa Bagnell, Maureen Brennan, Leslie Anne Campbell, Sharon Clark, Kristina Bradley, Olivia Ross
Author Information
  1. Jill Chorney: Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  2. Debbie Johnson Emberly: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  3. Jennifer Jeffrey: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  4. Amos Hundert: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  5. Onur Pakkanlilar: Emergency Medical Care Inc, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  6. Sabina Abidi: Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  7. Alexa Bagnell: Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  8. Maureen Brennan: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  9. Leslie Anne Campbell: Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  10. Sharon Clark: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  11. Kristina Bradley: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID
  12. Olivia Ross: Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental health and addictions (MHA) care is complex and individualized and requires coordination across providers and areas of care. Knowledge management is an essential facilitator and common challenge in MHA services.
OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to describe the development of a knowledge management system (KMS) and the associated processes in 1 MHA program. We also aimed to examine the uptake and use, satisfaction, and feedback on implementation among a group of pilot testers.
METHODS: This project was conducted as a continuous quality-improvement initiative. Integrated stakeholder engagement was used to scope the content and design the information architecture to be implemented using a commercially available knowledge management platform. A group of 30 clinical and administrative staff were trained and tested with the KMS over a period of 10 weeks. Feedback was collected via surveys and focus groups. System analytics were used to characterize engagement. The content, design, and full-scale implementation planning of the KMS were refined based on the results.
RESULTS: Satisfaction with accessing the content increased from baseline to after the pilot. Most testers indicated that they would recommend the KMS to a colleague, and satisfaction with KMS functionalities was high. A median of 7 testers was active each week, and testers were active for a median of 4 days over the course of the pilot. Focus group themes included the following: the KMS was a solution to problems for staff members, functionality of the KMS was important, quality content matters, training was helpful and could be improved, and KMS access was required to be easy and barrier free.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge management is an ongoing need in MHA services, and KMSs hold promise in addressing this need. Testers in 1 MHA program found a KMS that is easy to use and would recommend it to colleagues. Opportunities to improve implementation and increase uptake were identified. Future research is needed to understand the impact of KMSs on quality of care and organizational efficiency.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1):64-74 [PMID: 25734604]
  2. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017 Sep;27(5):541-558 [PMID: 29217960]
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 25;11:173 [PMID: 21787403]
  4. Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:331-340 [PMID: 27919392]
  5. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jun;50(455):489-90 [PMID: 10962792]
  6. Technol Health Care. 2015;24 Suppl 1:S297-306 [PMID: 26444813]
  7. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):142-51 [PMID: 19184221]
  8. Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):103 [PMID: 33239097]
  9. J Med Syst. 2009 Oct;33(5):369-77 [PMID: 19827263]
  10. J Med Syst. 2012 Feb;36(1):241-77 [PMID: 20703721]
  11. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;22(4):339-44 [PMID: 19461515]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0KMSMHAmanagementtesterscontentcareKnowledgeknowledgeimplementationgrouppilotMentalhealthservicesaimed1programuptakeusesatisfactionengagementuseddesigninformationstaffSystemrecommendmedianactivequalityeasyneedKMSsBACKGROUND:addictionscomplexindividualizedrequirescoordinationacrossprovidersareasessentialfacilitatorcommonchallengeOBJECTIVE:paperdescribedevelopmentsystemassociatedprocessesalsoexaminefeedbackamongMETHODS:projectconductedcontinuousquality-improvementinitiativeIntegratedstakeholderscopearchitectureimplementedusingcommerciallyavailableplatform30clinicaladministrativetrainedtestedperiod10weeksFeedbackcollectedviasurveysfocusgroupsanalyticscharacterizefull-scaleplanningrefinedbasedresultsRESULTS:Satisfactionaccessingincreasedbaselineindicatedcolleaguefunctionalitieshigh7week4dayscourseFocusthemesincludedfollowing:solutionproblemsmembersfunctionalityimportantmatterstraininghelpfulimprovedaccessrequiredbarrierfreeCONCLUSIONS:ongoingholdpromiseaddressingTestersfoundcolleaguesOpportunitiesimproveincreaseidentifiedFutureresearchneededunderstandimpactorganizationalefficiencyImplementationManagementHealthAddictions:MixedMethodsCaseStudycapacitybuildingmentaltechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.