���Comparison of caddisfly (Insecta, Trichoptera) assemblages from lake and river habitats of the Huron Mountains of Michigan (USA).

David C Houghton
Author Information
  1. David C Houghton: Department of Biology, Hillsdale College, 33 East College Street, Hillsdale, MI 49242, USA Hillsdale College Hillsdale United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

The caddisfly assemblages of six lakes and 12 1-4 order streams of the Huron Mountains of northern Upper Michigan (USA) were sampled monthly with ultraviolet lights during June-September 2019. A total of 169 species representing 63 genera and 19 families was collected, including five species not found elsewhere in Michigan and two species endemic to the state. Species assemblages between lotic and lentic habitats were distinct from each other, with 11 species indicating lakes and 23 indicating rivers. Despite the taxonomic differences, biomass of functional feeding groups (FFGs) was similar between lakes and rivers, except for higher biomass of predators in the former and higher biomass of filtering collectors in the latter. The FFG biomass of both habitat types was dominated (50-70%) by shredders. Considering the undisturbed condition of the habitats, the caddisfly assemblages and FFG biomass of the Huron Mountains can serve as regional biological monitoring reference conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10 [PMID: 21560670]
  2. Zookeys. 2015 Nov 05;(532):137-58 [PMID: 26692811]
  3. Zookeys. 2016 Jan 21;(556):43-63 [PMID: 26877693]
  4. Zookeys. 2020 Jul 22;951:37-46 [PMID: 32774104]
  5. Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Jul;95(1-3):153-81 [PMID: 15195825]
  6. Ecol Indic. 2021 Jan 1;122: [PMID: 33897301]
  7. Science. 2020 Apr 24;368(6489):417-420 [PMID: 32327596]
  8. Ecology. 2014 Jun;95(6):1506-19 [PMID: 25039216]
  9. Zookeys. 2012;(189):1-389 [PMID: 22615539]
  10. Zookeys. 2018 Jan 17;(730):57-74 [PMID: 29416396]
  11. Sci Prog. 2019 Jun;102(2):181-196 [PMID: 31829843]
  12. Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):364-72 [PMID: 21314881]
  13. Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1241-1251 [PMID: 32022305]
  14. Sci Adv. 2017 Mar 22;3(3):e1601765 [PMID: 28345035]
  15. Zookeys. 2022 Jul 11;1111:287-300 [PMID: 36760848]
  16. Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):240-3 [PMID: 14724637]
  17. Environ Monit Assess. 2007 Dec;135(1-3):253-64 [PMID: 17345008]
  18. Insects. 2019 May 01;10(5): [PMID: 31052441]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0biomassassemblageslakesMichiganspeciescaddisflyHuronMountainshabitatsstreamsUSAindicatingriversfeedinghigherFFGTrichopterasix121-4ordernorthernUppersampledmonthlyultravioletlightsJune-September2019total169representing63genera19familiescollectedincludingfivefoundelsewheretwoendemicstateSpeciesloticlenticdistinct1123DespitetaxonomicdifferencesfunctionalgroupsFFGssimilarexceptpredatorsformerfilteringcollectorslatterhabitattypesdominated50-70%shreddersConsideringundisturbedconditioncanserveregionalbiologicalmonitoringreferenceconditions���ComparisonInsectalakeriverFunctionalgroup

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)