Testing the social mindfulness paradigm: Longitudinal evidence of its unidimensionality, reliability, validity, and replicability in a sample of health care providers.

Tobias Altmann, Marcus Roth
Author Information
  1. Tobias Altmann: Department of Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. ORCID
  2. Marcus Roth: Department of Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Social mindfulness is a relatively new concept in psychological research and is attracting increasing attention. Recent studies have provided evidence of its relevance with regard to prosocial behavior and empathy, but also concerning individual well-being and psychological health. In such studies, social mindfulness has been assessed using the social mindfulness paradigm by Van Doesum and colleagues, which is the standard measure of social mindfulness to date. However, evidence is scarce or lacking with regard to whether this measurement approach is unidimensional, whether it produces (test-retest) reliable and valid measurements, and whether its associations with personality and empathy are replicable.
METHODS: To test these assumptions, we assessed a sample of 265 participants currently working in health care professions on social mindfulness, several concepts of empathy, and the HEXACO personality dimensions longitudinally at two measurement occasions.
RESULTS: The results supported the assumption of unidimensionality of the measure. Partial support was found for its reliability, validity, and replicability. Test-retest reliability was acceptable, but the associations with personality and empathy turned out weaker than expected.
CONCLUSIONS: The social mindfulness paradigm is an interesting approach toward understanding social mindfulness, meaning mindfulness of other people's needs. Potential directions for the further development of the social mindfulness paradigm and its network of relations, especially to empathy, are discussed.

References

  1. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):225-243 [PMID: 29781776]
  2. Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):666-72 [PMID: 24295238]
  3. Acta Biomed. 2015 Sep 09;86 Suppl 2:104-15 [PMID: 26629665]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:1-9 [PMID: 29221833]
  5. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):150-66 [PMID: 18453460]
  6. Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(5):1402-1410 [PMID: 30294387]
  7. J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):340-5 [PMID: 20017063]
  8. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 [PMID: 18839484]
  9. J Nurs Educ. 2013 Apr;52(4):192-7 [PMID: 23480066]
  10. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Jun;48(2):198-208 [PMID: 21639664]
  11. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 [PMID: 11280420]
  12. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2212 [PMID: 30483202]
  13. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2015;20(2):157-71 [PMID: 25530230]
  14. Psychol Health. 2021 Dec;36(12):1441-1460 [PMID: 33100035]
  15. Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1383-1392 [PMID: 26416137]
  16. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul;105(1):86-103 [PMID: 23647176]
  17. Am Psychol. 1993 Jan;48(1):26-34 [PMID: 8427480]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105 [PMID: 13634291]
  19. Nurs Forum. 2015 Jan-Mar;50(1):1-8 [PMID: 24383747]
  20. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;15(1):28-50 [PMID: 20435807]
  21. Psychol Bull. 1987 Jan;101(1):91-119 [PMID: 3562705]
  22. J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):62-71 [PMID: 19085285]
  23. Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):691-704 [PMID: 19803591]
  24. Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 24;5:1202 [PMID: 25386148]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mindfulness
Reproducibility of Results
Empathy
Personality
Health Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mindfulnesssocialempathyevidencehealthparadigmwhetherpersonalityreliabilitypsychologicalstudiesregardassessedmeasuremeasurementapproachassociationssamplecareunidimensionalityvalidityreplicabilityOBJECTIVES:SocialrelativelynewconceptresearchattractingincreasingattentionRecentprovidedrelevanceprosocialbehavioralsoconcerningindividualwell-beingusingVanDoesumcolleaguesstandarddateHoweverscarcelackingunidimensionalproducestest-retestreliablevalidmeasurementsreplicableMETHODS:testassumptions265participantscurrentlyworkingprofessionsseveralconceptsHEXACOdimensionslongitudinallytwooccasionsRESULTS:resultssupportedassumptionPartialsupportfoundTest-retestacceptableturnedweakerexpectedCONCLUSIONS:interestingtowardunderstandingmeaningpeople'sneedsPotentialdirectionsdevelopmentnetworkrelationsespeciallydiscussedTestingparadigm:Longitudinalproviders

Similar Articles

Cited By