In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii.

Christian M Gill, Debora Santini, Miki Takemura, Christopher Longshaw, Yoshinori Yamano, Roger Echols, David P Nicolau
Author Information
  1. Christian M Gill: Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
  2. Debora Santini: Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
  3. Miki Takemura: Research Planning Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, 3-1-1, Futaba-cho, Toyonaka,Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
  4. Christopher Longshaw: Scientific Affairs, Shionogi B.V., 33 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6UF, UK.
  5. Yoshinori Yamano: Research Planning Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, 3-1-1, Futaba-cho, Toyonaka,Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
  6. Roger Echols: Infectious Disease Drug Development Consulting, LLC, 753 Westport Road, Easton, CT, USA.
  7. David P Nicolau: Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model.
METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking.
RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

References

  1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Feb 11;76(3):680-683 [PMID: 33227138]
  2. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 15;76(10):2615-2621 [PMID: 34212183]
  3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Mar 15;66(3):e0197521 [PMID: 35007134]
  4. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 May;37(5):962-9 [PMID: 8517722]
  5. Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655 [PMID: 35065702]
  6. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):226-240 [PMID: 33058795]
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12): [PMID: 28971872]
  8. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Oct;35(10):2098-101 [PMID: 1759832]
  9. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;18(4):391-400 [PMID: 29456043]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2089-2114 [PMID: 34864936]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4124-8 [PMID: 24920779]
  12. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Feb;53(2):177-184 [PMID: 30395986]
  13. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(Suppl 7):S544-S551 [PMID: 31724049]
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5): [PMID: 30833428]
  15. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Jun;28(6):645-653 [PMID: 35639112]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Dec 21;63(1): [PMID: 30323035]
  17. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Sep 30;77(10):2803-2808 [PMID: 35848936]
  18. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11): [PMID: 28848004]
  19. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 May 03;4(3):dlac047 [PMID: 35529054]
  20. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar;28:120-124 [PMID: 34958997]
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jan 29;63(2): [PMID: 30420477]
  22. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225 [PMID: 33058798]
  23. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep;22:738-741 [PMID: 32702396]

MeSH Term

Humans
Animals
Mice
Ceftazidime
Meropenem
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Sulbactam
Acinetobacter baumannii
Azabicyclo Compounds
Ampicillin
Drug Combinations
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Cefiderocol

Chemicals

Ceftazidime
Meropenem
Anti-Bacterial Agents
sultamicillin
Sulbactam
avibactam
Azabicyclo Compounds
Ampicillin
Drug Combinations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0isolatescefiderocolresistanceampicillin/sulbactamvivoceftazidime/avibactamMICsmg/LC-CZAC-SAMproducedefficacybaumanniiC-MEMcefiderocol-non-susceptiblepreventioncombinationmeropenemusinghuman-simulatedregimensHSRclinical2developedtherapyincludingcontrolcefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactamlog10cfu/thighcomparedassesseddevelopmenttreatmentrelativeanimalscombinationsstackingkill-3treatedthreeOBJECTIVE:EvaluatemurineinfectionmodelMETHODS:total15assessed:previouslyn = 38n = 2≥32n = 10VEBPER-harbouringMicereceivedinactivecefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactamcefiderocol + meropenemHSRsmeanchangestartinginoculumResistance>4-foldincreaseMICvitroactivitiesdiscRESULTS:significant75 ± 037reduction55 ± 050-218 ± 175baselineElevatedoccurredoneelevatednoneDiscreturnedleastCLSIintermediatebreakpointmaycorrelateCONCLUSIONS:12Cefiderocolpreventedcefiderocol-high-end-susceptiblepropensitydatasupportevaluationmulti-drug-resistant&versusAcinetobacter

Similar Articles

Cited By