Resting-state neural correlates of visual Gestalt experience.

Marilena Wilding, Anja Ischebeck, Natalia Zaretskaya
Author Information
  1. Marilena Wilding: Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria. ORCID
  2. Anja Ischebeck: Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria.
  3. Natalia Zaretskaya: Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Subjective perceptual experience is influenced not only by bottom-up sensory information and experience-based top-down processes, but also by an individual's current brain state. Specifically, a previous study found increased prestimulus insula and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) activity before participants perceived an illusory Gestalt (global) compared with the non-illusory (local) interpretation of a bistable stimulus. That study provided only a snapshot of the brain state that favors the illusory interpretation. In the current study, we tested whether areas that differentiate between the illusory and non-illusory perception, immediately before stimulus onset, are also associated with an individual's general tendency to perceive it, which remains stable over time. We examined individual differences in task-free functional connectivity of insula and IPS and related them to differences in the individuals' duration of the two stimulus interpretations. We found stronger connectivity of the IPS with areas of the default mode and visual networks to be associated with shorter local perceptual phases, i.e. a faster switch to an illusory percept, and an opposite effect for insula connectivity with the early visual cortex. Our findings suggest an important role of IPS and insula interactions with nodes of key intrinsic networks in forming a perceptual tendency toward illusory Gestalt perception.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 25;27(30):7963-73 [PMID: 17652587]
  2. Front Neuroinform. 2011 Aug 22;5:13 [PMID: 21897815]
  3. Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):307-319 [PMID: 28099068]
  4. Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:367-377 [PMID: 26975554]
  5. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):55-65 [PMID: 18424780]
  6. J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 20;26(51):13338-43 [PMID: 17182784]
  7. Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):611-22 [PMID: 20512379]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9318-9323 [PMID: 30150393]
  9. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;3(1):87-103 [PMID: 26302474]
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0132209 [PMID: 26125559]
  11. Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:69-78 [PMID: 25281800]
  12. Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22 [PMID: 11322983]
  13. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Aug;22(8):503-513 [PMID: 34226715]
  14. Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 1;119:229-34 [PMID: 26123379]
  15. J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;33(2):523-31 [PMID: 23303932]
  16. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Sep;42(5):1110-23 [PMID: 27280452]
  17. J Vis. 2005 Apr 04;5(4):287-98 [PMID: 15929652]
  18. Elife. 2018 Jul 31;7: [PMID: 30063006]
  19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26 [PMID: 21684189]
  20. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2297-307 [PMID: 20869451]
  21. J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56 [PMID: 17329432]
  22. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Mar;22(3):181-192 [PMID: 33483717]
  23. Perception. 2014;43(11):1239-48 [PMID: 25638939]
  24. Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):111-116 [PMID: 30532080]
  25. J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7158-7169 [PMID: 30006362]
  26. Neuroimage. 2006 Dec;33(4):1072-81 [PMID: 17011214]
  27. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1125-39 [PMID: 17615138]
  28. Cell Rep. 2021 May 4;35(5):109081 [PMID: 33951427]
  29. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2018 Jul-Dec;11(2):63-76 [PMID: 32612780]
  30. J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 21;29(42):13410-7 [PMID: 19846728]
  31. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 24;9:589 [PMID: 29740374]
  32. Vision Res. 1992 Feb;32(2):263-73 [PMID: 1574843]
  33. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3911-31 [PMID: 25452571]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 5;105(31):10984-9 [PMID: 18664576]
  35. Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:6-14 [PMID: 29288131]
  36. Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94 [PMID: 9931268]
  37. Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jul;44(1):162-7 [PMID: 10893535]
  38. Perception. 2003;32(3):295-305 [PMID: 12729381]
  39. Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 8;21(3):R106-7 [PMID: 21300270]
  40. Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 1;69:120-5 [PMID: 23261640]
  41. J Vis. 2019 Jan 2;19(1):8 [PMID: 30650436]
  42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12574-12579 [PMID: 27791099]
  43. Neuropsychologia. 2020 May;142:107426 [PMID: 32147392]
  44. J Neurosci. 2022 Oct 26;42(43):8125-8135 [PMID: 36150890]
  45. Cereb Cortex. 2018 Sep 1;28(9):3095-3114 [PMID: 28981612]
  46. J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 13;31(28):10293-301 [PMID: 21753006]
  47. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):864-70 [PMID: 22245341]
  48. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316:29-52 [PMID: 24502540]
  49. Neuroimage. 2022 Aug 15;257:119289 [PMID: 35537599]
  50. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):462-73 [PMID: 17065254]
  51. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Apr;45(4):205-17 [PMID: 13052853]
  52. Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11-22 [PMID: 14654453]
  53. J Vis. 2011 Mar 17;11(3):13 [PMID: 21415227]
  54. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):310-8 [PMID: 19540794]
  55. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:77-103 [PMID: 28854000]
  56. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 15;48(1):63-72 [PMID: 19573611]
  57. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(3):e0121945 [PMID: 25835001]
  58. J Vis. 2010 Sep 01;10(11):1 [PMID: 20884496]
  59. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 5;367(1591):988-1000 [PMID: 22371620]
  60. J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 31;28(53):14481-5 [PMID: 19118182]
  61. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:349-59 [PMID: 23571418]
  62. J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Jan 30;276:56-72 [PMID: 27832957]
  63. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 May;19(5):278-84 [PMID: 25863415]
  64. Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:393-401 [PMID: 29339310]
  65. Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):1626-30 [PMID: 20727757]
  66. Br J Psychol. 1967 May;58(1):143-5 [PMID: 5582864]
  67. Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 27;15:805690 [PMID: 35153663]
  68. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1448-59 [PMID: 19446646]

MeSH Term

Humans
Brain Mapping
Brain
Illusions
Parietal Lobe
Insular Cortex
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Photic Stimulation
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0illusoryinsulaIPSconnectivityperceptualstudyGestaltstimulusperceptionvisualnetworksexperiencealsoindividual'scurrentbrainstatefoundnon-illusorylocalinterpretationbistableareasassociatedtendencydifferencesfunctionalSubjectiveinfluencedbottom-upsensoryinformationexperience-basedtop-downprocessesSpecificallypreviousincreasedprestimulusintraparietalsulcusactivityparticipantsperceivedglobalcomparedprovidedsnapshotfavorstestedwhetherdifferentiateimmediatelyonsetgeneralperceiveremainsstabletimeexaminedindividualtask-freerelatedindividuals'durationtwointerpretationsstrongerdefaultmodeshorterphasesiefasterswitchperceptoppositeeffectearlycortexfindingssuggestimportantroleinteractionsnodeskeyintrinsicformingtowardResting-stateneuralcorrelatesillusionfMRIresting-statesubjective

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.