Effect evaluation of case-based learning with situated cognition theory on competence training for student nurses in pediatric surgery.

Miyan Wang, Xiaohong Chen, Yuwei Yang, Haiyan Wang, Yan Yan, Xiaoying Huang, Yanli Bi, Wensha Cao, Guoxue Deng
Author Information
  1. Miyan Wang: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  2. Xiaohong Chen: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  3. Yuwei Yang: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  4. Haiyan Wang: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  5. Yan Yan: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  6. Xiaoying Huang: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  7. Yanli Bi: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  8. Wensha Cao: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.
  9. Guoxue Deng: Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang 621000, PR China.

Abstract

Objective: The case-based learning with situated cognition theory (CBL-SCT) approach focuses on teaching over learning, making it suited to student nurse education. However, it is rare in student nurse training in pediatric surgery, and some subjective evaluations of the learning effect are still affected by the assessor. This study investigated the effect of the CBL-SCT approach on improving the nursing quality/safety and comprehensive performance of student nurses, and explored a method for analyzing the reliability of subjective evaluations.
Methods: Thirty-six student nurses were divided into a control group and an experimental group and received seven days of orientation via conventional and CBL-SCT training, respectively. The learning effect was evaluated via examining their implementation of nursing quality criteria within the following month and their comprehensive clinical performance after six months. Among the evaluation indicators, professional skills, job competency, and professional quality were evaluated by assessors, whose scores were tested for consistency using Cronbach's alpha.
Results: Among the 11 nursing quality criteria, the correct implementation of patient identification and communication ( = 2.257,  = 0.031), medication-checking ( = 5.444,  < 0.001), tumbles/bed-falling prevention ( = 3.609,  = 0.001), pressure injury prevention ( = 3.834,  = 0.001), catheter management ( = 3.409,  = 0.002), and nursing record writing ( = 2.911,  = 0.006) in the experimental group were all higher than in the control group. Six months after training, the experimental group was also higher in professional theory ( = 4.889,  < 0.001), professional skills ( = 2.736,  = 0.010), job competency ( = 5.166,  < 0.001), and professional quality ( = 16.809,  < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha test verified that the assessors' evaluations had good internal consistency and reliability for job competency (alpha = 0.847, 95% CI lower limit = 0.769), professional quality (alpha = 0.840, 95% CI lower limit = 0.759), and professional skills (alpha = 0.888, 95% CI lower limit = 0.822).
Conclusions: The CBL-SCT method can help student nurses quickly change their nursing role, and Cronbach's alpha test can verify the reliability of subjective evaluations, thus indirectly reflecting the training effect equitably and objectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2020 May-Aug;8(2):125-132 [PMID: 32587494]
  2. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 May;37:29-38 [PMID: 31060016]
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 28;18(1):172 [PMID: 30055612]
  4. Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433 [PMID: 28557467]
  5. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):559-568 [PMID: 28626086]
  6. Cuad Bioet. 2015 May-Aug;26(87):303-9 [PMID: 26378602]
  7. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Dec;43(26):3757-3763 [PMID: 32372705]
  8. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105272 [PMID: 35092915]
  9. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):241-249 [PMID: 32031971]
  10. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):90 [PMID: 33546690]
  11. Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Aug;7(4):256-263 [PMID: 29704167]
  12. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020 Nov;2:100011 [PMID: 33106797]
  13. Indian J Med Ethics. 2016 Jul-Sep;1(3):144-7 [PMID: 27474694]
  14. Open Nurs J. 2018 Jun 29;12:125-132 [PMID: 30069269]
  15. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May 22;91:104480 [PMID: 32474132]
  16. JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Sep 13;19(11):3073-3079 [PMID: 34519283]
  17. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Mar 1;42(1):118-122 [PMID: 29357269]
  18. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 1;96(7):498-505 [PMID: 29962552]
  19. Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):567-586 [PMID: 31319782]
  20. Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2173-2181 [PMID: 28130728]
  21. Nurse Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct 01;46(5):322-326 [PMID: 33370012]
  22. Lancet. 2019 Sep 14;394(10202):895 [PMID: 31526719]
  23. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013 Feb;45(1):14-20; quiz E7-8 [PMID: 23291868]
  24. Psychometrika. 2021 Dec;86(4):877-886 [PMID: 34460069]
  25. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc96 [PMID: 33364375]
  26. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521 [PMID: 29973258]
  27. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Jan;28:13-19 [PMID: 28926753]
  28. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):157 [PMID: 35260163]
  29. J Nurs Educ. 2014 Jan 1;53(1):7-13 [PMID: 24308538]
  30. Creat Nurs. 2021 May 1;27(2):131-137 [PMID: 33990455]
  31. J Transcult Nurs. 2021 Jan;32(1):30-40 [PMID: 31910793]
  32. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 1;58(6):404-407 [PMID: 32253891]
  33. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:124-128 [PMID: 31125765]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 04;16(21): [PMID: 31690034]
  35. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Oct;48:102889 [PMID: 32998081]
  36. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):281-289 [PMID: 32324158]
  37. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 May;53:103056 [PMID: 33930750]
  38. J Educ Health Promot. 2015 Feb 23;4:2 [PMID: 25767813]
  39. Springerplus. 2016 Oct 21;5(1):1821 [PMID: 27818859]
  40. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):840 [PMID: 34412624]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningprofessionalstudentquality = 0001CBL-SCTtrainingeffectnursinggroup95%cognitiontheoryevaluationsnurses< 0case-basedsituatedsubjectivereliabilityexperimentalskillsjobcompetencyCronbach'salpha = 2 = 3alpha = 0CIlowerlimit = 0approachnursepediatricsurgerycomprehensiveperformancemethodcontrolviaevaluatedimplementationcriteriamonthsAmongevaluationconsistency = 5preventionhighertestcanObjective:focusesteachingmakingsuitededucationHoweverrarestillaffectedassessorstudyinvestigatedimprovingquality/safetyexploredanalyzingMethods:Thirty-sixdividedreceivedsevendaysorientationconventionalrespectivelyexaminingwithinfollowingmonthclinicalsixindicatorsassessorswhosescorestestedusingResults:11correctpatientidentificationcommunication257031medication-checking444tumbles/bed-falling609pressureinjury834cathetermanagement409002recordwriting911006Sixalso = 4889736010166 = 16809verifiedassessors'goodinternal847769840759888822Conclusions:helpquicklychangeroleverifythusindirectlyreflectingequitablyobjectivelyEffectcompetenceCI-LLlowlimitconfidenceintervalCase-basedNAapplicableNursingReliabilitySituatedTraining

Similar Articles

Cited By