Production of multimodal signals to assert social dominance in white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari).

Raimundo N Alencar, Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho, Selene S C Nogueira
Author Information
  1. Raimundo N Alencar: Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
  2. Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho: Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Selene S C Nogueira: Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

In this study we aimed to examine whether the 'redundancy' (a backup function to ensure the signal transmission) or 'multiple messages' (sensory communication system in combination) hypothesis would explain the function of multimodal communication of white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari-WLPs). We also aimed to assess the individual factors (the social rank and sex of the sender) influencing the production of, and responses to unimodal and multimodal signals. We determined the social rank of 21 WLPs living in two captive groups and quantified the production of unimodal and multimodal signals when displaying threatening and submissive behaviors. WLPs most often produce multimodal signals independent of a previous unimodal signal failure, which suggests that they were adding more information, such as the sender's size, rather than merely increasing efficacy by engaging a different receiver's sensory channel. There was no effect of the sender's sex in the production of, and responses to, multimodal signals. However, the higher the sender's social rank, the greater the production of multimodal signals when WLPs were displaying threatening behaviors; whereas the lower the sender's social rank, the greater the production of multimodal signals when displaying submission behaviors. Multimodal signals elicited more non-aggressive responses than did the unimodal signals when displaying a threat. Moreover, the higher the sender's social rank, the greater the occurrence of non-aggressive responses to multimodal signals when displaying a threat; whereas the opposite occurred when displaying submission. Our findings support the 'multiple messages' hypothesis to explain the function of multimodal signaling during agonistic interactions in WLPs. Additionally, both the production of, and responses to, multimodal signals are related to the sender's social rank. These results allow us to suggest that the production of multimodal signals may have a key role in mitigating conflict and thus promoting group cohesion among white-lipped peccaries.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.21546516; 10.6084/m9.figshare.21546516.v1

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13338 [PMID: 32770010]
  2. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2007 Jan;46(1):28-34 [PMID: 17203913]
  3. Behav Biol. 1974 Jun;11(2):131-54 [PMID: 4367951]
  4. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017;71(6):96 [PMID: 28596637]
  5. Bull Math Biol. 1999 Jul;61(4):727-57 [PMID: 17883222]
  6. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0190961 [PMID: 29364898]
  7. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e84738 [PMID: 24454745]
  8. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0158665 [PMID: 27409797]
  9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1785-801 [PMID: 22641818]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200450 [PMID: 35000449]
  11. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):575-95 [PMID: 14700392]
  12. Zoo Biol. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):320-6 [PMID: 24958733]
  13. Am Nat. 2005 Aug;166(2):231-45 [PMID: 16032576]
  14. Zoology (Jena). 2017 Dec;125:24-28 [PMID: 28870385]
  15. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016 May;160(1):102-12 [PMID: 26801956]
  16. J Exp Biol. 2008 Jul;211(Pt 13):2052-7 [PMID: 18552293]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8184-9 [PMID: 17470779]
  18. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 May;25(5):292-300 [PMID: 20022401]
  19. Physiol Behav. 2017 Mar 15;171:110-119 [PMID: 28065723]
  20. Anim Cogn. 2018 Sep;21(5):619-629 [PMID: 29876698]
  21. Commun Biol. 2021 Jul 27;4(1):917 [PMID: 34316012]
  22. Behav Processes. 2021 Dec;193:104524 [PMID: 34592345]
  23. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200445 [PMID: 35000440]
  24. Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):114-21 [PMID: 15161146]
  25. Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67 [PMID: 4597405]
  26. Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272-3 [PMID: 10084931]
  27. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1523-1539 [PMID: 23956487]
  28. Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 21;16(6):R191-2 [PMID: 16546066]

MeSH Term

Animals
Artiodactyla
Social Dominance
Aggression

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0multimodalsignalssocialproductionrankdisplayingsender'sresponsesunimodalWLPsfunctionwhite-lippedbehaviorsgreateraimedsignal'multiplemessages'sensorycommunicationhypothesisexplainpeccariesTayassusexthreateninghigherwhereassubmissionnon-aggressivethreatstudyexaminewhether'redundancy'backupensuretransmissionsystemcombinationpecari-WLPsalsoassessindividualfactorssenderinfluencingdetermined21livingtwocaptivegroupsquantifiedsubmissiveoftenproduceindependentpreviousfailuresuggestsaddinginformationsizerathermerelyincreasingefficacyengagingdifferentreceiver'schanneleffectHoweverlowerMultimodalelicitedMoreoveroccurrenceoppositeoccurredfindingssupportsignalingagonisticinteractionsAdditionallyrelatedresultsallowussuggestmaykeyrolemitigatingconflictthuspromotinggroupcohesionamongProductionassertdominancepeccarypecari

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.