Senhance Robotic Platform in Pediatrics: Early US Experience.

Maria Consuelo Puentes, Marko Rojnica, Thomas Sims, Robert Jones, Francesco M Bianco, Thom E Lobe
Author Information
  1. Maria Consuelo Puentes: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, 840 S Wood Street, Ste 416, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. ORCID
  2. Marko Rojnica: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, 840 S Wood Street, Ste 416, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
  3. Thomas Sims: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, 840 S Wood Street, Ste 416, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
  4. Robert Jones: Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
  5. Francesco M Bianco: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, 840 S Wood Street, Ste 416, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. ORCID
  6. Thom E Lobe: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, 840 S Wood Street, Ste 416, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Different robotic systems have been used widely in human surgery since 2000, but pediatric patients require some features that are lacking in the most frequently used robotic systems.
HYPOTHESIS: The Senhance robotic system is a safe and an effective device for use in infants and children that has some advantages over other robotic systems.
METHODS: All patients between 0 and 18 years of age whose surgery was amenable to laparoscopy were offered enrollment in this IRB-approved study. We assessed the feasibility, ease and safety of using this robotic platform in pediatric patients including: set-up time, operative time, conversions, complications and outcomes.
RESULTS: Eight patients, ranging from 4 months to 17 years of age and weighing between 8 and 130 kg underwent a variety of procedures including: cholecystectomy (3), inguinal herniorrhaphy (3), orchidopexy for undescended testes (1) and exploration for a suspected enteric duplication cyst (1). All robotic procedures were successfully performed. The 4-month-old (mo), 8 kg patient underwent an uneventful robotic exploration in an attempt to locate a cyst that was hidden in the mesentery at the junction of the terminal ileum and cecum, but ultimately the patient required an anticipated laparotomy to palpate the cyst definitively and to excise it completely. There was no blood loss and no complications. Robotic manipulation with the reusable 3 mm instruments proved successful in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with the Senhance robotic platform suggests that this is a safe and effective device for pediatric surgery that is easy to use, and which warrants continued evaluation. Most importantly, there appears to be no lower age or weight restrictions to its use.

Keywords

References

  1. Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;9(3): [PMID: 35327674]
  2. J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):357-359 [PMID: 30426353]
  3. Anaesthesist. 2001 Apr;50(4):271-5 [PMID: 11355424]
  4. Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6066-6072 [PMID: 33112985]
  5. Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov 28;37:63-67 [PMID: 32926398]
  6. JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4): [PMID: 30524184]
  7. Curr Urol Rep. 2019 May 18;20(7):35 [PMID: 31104148]
  8. Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1293-304, vii [PMID: 14712866]
  9. J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):191-197 [PMID: 30993523]
  10. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Dec;15(6):647-52 [PMID: 16366877]
  11. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jan;66(1):3-11 [PMID: 24567806]
  12. Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):831-837 [PMID: 35028731]
  13. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;46(1):98-104 [PMID: 12686899]
  14. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;30(4):151082 [PMID: 34412879]
  15. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):315-321 [PMID: 31976805]
  16. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012 Mar 01;13(1):74-6 [PMID: 24627681]
  17. Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9 [PMID: 20045162]
  18. Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):189-196 [PMID: 36422812]
  19. Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:243-249 [PMID: 30716159]
  20. J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):215-228 [PMID: 33772434]
  21. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):431-443 [PMID: 32169188]
  22. Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7077-7091 [PMID: 35986221]
  23. Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):319-20 [PMID: 24426462]
  24. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96 [PMID: 19638912]
  25. J Visc Surg. 2011 Oct;148(5 Suppl):e3-8 [PMID: 21974854]
  26. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1636-1655 [PMID: 29442240]
  27. Int J Med Robot. 2022 Dec;18(6):e2462 [PMID: 36121334]
  28. J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):643-647 [PMID: 30953270]
  29. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2643-50 [PMID: 25480612]
  30. J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):371-376 [PMID: 31301021]
  31. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Aug;48(4):193-7 [PMID: 11005591]
  32. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Apr;27(2):e12-e17 [PMID: 28234706]
  33. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):858-65 [PMID: 23583146]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0roboticsurgerypediatricpatientsSenhancesystemsuseage3cystusedsafeeffectivedeviceinfantsyearsplatformincluding:timecomplications8kgunderwentprocedures1explorationpatientRoboticINTRODUCTION:Differentwidelyhumansince2000requirefeatureslackingfrequentlyHYPOTHESIS:systemchildrenadvantagesMETHODS:018whoseamenablelaparoscopyofferedenrollmentIRB-approvedstudyassessedfeasibilityeasesafetyusingset-upoperativeconversionsoutcomesRESULTS:Eightranging4months17weighing130varietycholecystectomyinguinalherniorrhaphyorchidopexyundescendedtestessuspectedentericduplicationsuccessfullyperformed4-month-oldmouneventfulattemptlocatehiddenmesenteryjunctionterminalileumcecumultimatelyrequiredanticipatedlaparotomypalpatedefinitivelyexcisecompletelybloodlossmanipulationreusablemminstrumentsprovedsuccessfulcasesCONCLUSIONS:initialexperiencesuggestseasywarrantscontinuedevaluationimportantlyappearslowerweightrestrictionsPlatformPediatrics:EarlyUSExperiencerobotics

Similar Articles

Cited By