The relationship between mobility and COVID-19 pandemic: Daily evidence from an emerging country by causality analysis.

Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, Özer Depren, Serpil Kiliç Depren
Author Information
  1. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal: Financial Reporting and Subsidiaries Directorate in Borsa İstanbul, İstanbul/Turkey.
  2. Özer Depren: Customer Experience Researches Directorate in Yapı Kredi Bank, İstanbul/Turkey.
  3. Serpil Kiliç Depren: Yıldız Technical University, Department of Statistics, İstanbul/Turkey.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between mobility (a proxy for transport) and the COVID-19 pandemic by focusing on Turkey as an example of an emerging country. In this context, eight types of mobility and two indicators of COVID-19 were analyzed using daily data from March 11, 2020 to December 7, 2020 by applying Toda-Yamamoto causality test. The findings revealed that (i) there is cointegration between the variables in the long term; (ii) there is an econometric causality between mobility indicators (mobility of grocery, park, residential, retail, and workplace) and pandemic indicators; (iii) various mobility indicators have an econometric causality with different pandemic indicators; (iv) neither driving mobility nor walking mobility has an econometric causality with the pandemic indicators whereas some of the other types of mobility, such as grocery, park, and retail do. These results generally show the effects of mobility and highlight the importance of appropriate mobility restrictions in terms of the pandemic.

Keywords

References

  1. Econ Anal Policy. 2020 Dec;68:191-198 [PMID: 33012962]
  2. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Nov;8:100244 [PMID: 34173479]
  3. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:180-186 [PMID: 32562846]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18): [PMID: 32942766]
  5. Int J Hosp Manag. 2007 Mar;26(1):200-212 [PMID: 32287849]
  6. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101512 [PMID: 32562472]
  7. Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):689-697 [PMID: 32014114]
  8. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100165 [PMID: 34173456]
  9. Measurement (Lond). 2021 Jan 15;168:108335 [PMID: 33519010]
  10. JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):123-124 [PMID: 33331845]
  11. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100123 [PMID: 34173453]
  12. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101682 [PMID: 32837376]
  13. Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Jul 13;17(5):4891-4904 [PMID: 33120533]
  14. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101669 [PMID: 32837374]
  15. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101732 [PMID: 32843886]
  16. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101604 [PMID: 32837363]
  17. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0241165 [PMID: 33095811]
  18. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1090 [PMID: 33597546]
  19. J Travel Med. 2020 Dec 23;27(8): [PMID: 32729931]
  20. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):130-140 [PMID: 33181098]
  21. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Nov;7(11):2221-2230 [PMID: 33016619]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mobilitypandemicindicatorscausalityCOVID-19econometricrelationshipTurkeyemergingcountrytypes2020Toda-YamamototestgroceryparkretailstudyexaminesproxytransportfocusingexamplecontexteighttwoanalyzedusingdailydataMarch11December7applyingfindingsrevealedcointegrationvariableslongtermiiresidentialworkplaceiiivariousdifferentivneitherdrivingwalkingwhereasresultsgenerallyshoweffectshighlightimportanceappropriaterestrictionstermspandemic:DailyevidenceanalysisMobility

Similar Articles

Cited By (26)