Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades.

Xia Zhao, Yi Zheng, Xincheng Zhao
Author Information
  1. Xia Zhao: School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.
  2. Yi Zheng: School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.
  3. Xincheng Zhao: Center for Applied English Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Abstract

Conceptual Metaphor has been a prevalent theme in the linguistic field for the recent twenty years. Numerous scholars worldwide have shown interest in it and published many academic papers from various stances on this topic. However, so far, there have been few rigorous scientific mapping investigations. With the help of bibliometric analysis tool, we selected 1,257 articles on Conceptual Metaphors published from 2002 to 2022, as collected in the Web of Sciences Core Collection database, from unique cognitive perspectives. The global annual scientific output of Conceptual Metaphor, including the cited articles, sources, keywords, and research trends, will be examined in this study. The most notable findings of this study are the following. First, there has been an upward trend in Conceptual Metaphor research over the last two decades. Second, the five most prominent research groups on Conceptual Metaphors are in Spain, the United States of America, China, Great Britain, and Russia. Third, future research on Conceptual Metaphors may focus on corpus linguistics, neurolinguistics, psychology, and critical discourse analysis. The interdisciplinary study may enhance the growth of Conceptual Metaphors.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Exp Optom. 2021 Jul;104(5):641-643 [PMID: 33689621]
  2. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104660 [PMID: 34346319]
  3. Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809-1831 [PMID: 26594073]
  4. J Bus Res. 2022 Oct;149:795-810 [PMID: 35669095]
  5. Scientometrics. 2004;61(1):69-77 [PMID: 32214553]
  6. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 13;12:662276 [PMID: 33927673]
  7. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 May;10(10):e2002222 [PMID: 33599117]
  8. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;161:1-13 [PMID: 29852952]
  9. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20700-20716 [PMID: 33405155]
  10. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:865737 [PMID: 35519635]
  11. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 16;8:729138 [PMID: 34869424]
  12. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;118:253-261 [PMID: 32834211]
  13. Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):641-671 [PMID: 29517263]
  14. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:128-145 [PMID: 30172133]
  15. Med Educ. 2021 Aug;55(8):903-911 [PMID: 33539558]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ConceptualresearchanalysisMetaphorsstudyMetaphorbibliometricrecentpublishedscientificarticlestrendstwodecadesmayinterdisciplinaryprevalentthemelinguisticfieldtwentyyearsNumerousscholarsworldwideshowninterestmanyacademicpapersvariousstancestopicHoweverfarrigorousmappinginvestigationshelptoolselected125720022022collectedWebSciencesCoreCollectiondatabaseuniquecognitiveperspectivesglobalannualoutputincludingcitedsourceskeywordswillexaminednotablefindingsfollowingFirstupwardtrendlastSecondfiveprominentgroupsSpainUnitedStatesAmericaChinaGreatBritainRussiaThirdfuturefocuscorpuslinguisticsneurolinguisticspsychologycriticaldiscourseenhancegrowthGlobalconceptualmetaphorevaluationquantitativequalitative

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.