Declared Intention to Vaccinate against COVID-19 and Actual Vaccination-The Role of Trust in Science, Conspiratorial Thinking and Religiosity.

Józef Maciuszek, Mateusz Polak, Katarzyna Stasiuk, Jerzy Rosiński
Author Information
  1. Józef Maciuszek: Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Communication, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Krakow, Poland.
  2. Mateusz Polak: Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Communication, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Krakow, Poland. ORCID
  3. Katarzyna Stasiuk: Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Communication, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Krakow, Poland. ORCID
  4. Jerzy Rosiński: Institute of Economy, Finance and Management, Faculty of Management and Communication, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Krakow, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

AIMS: The study aims to investigate how trust in science, conspiratorial thinking, and religiosity affected people's declared willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 at the onset of the vaccination program in Poland, their actual vaccination, and the consistency between intention and vaccination.
METHODS: In a longitudinal design, a representative sample of 918 members of the Polish general population was polled at the beginning of the vaccination program (February 2021) and polled again after 6 months of mass vaccination (August 2021). We measured the willingness to vaccinate, actual vaccination after 6 months, and individual variables-trust in science, conspiratorial thinking and religiosity.
RESULTS: The actual vaccination rate was higher than the declared intent, especially in the initially undecided and unwilling groups. Higher Trust in science and lower Conspiratorial Thinking were associated with declared intent to vaccinate and actual vaccination, while Religiosity was not clearly associated with vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS: Declared willingness to vaccinate is not an effective indicator of actual vaccination. Trust in science and Conspiratorial thinking are important factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. There may be a possibility to influence those unwilling to vaccinate and that are undecided to eventually get vaccinated.

Keywords

References

  1. Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 8;10(4):850-856 [PMID: 32910819]
  2. Prev Med. 2021 Sep;150:106694 [PMID: 34171345]
  3. Psychol Med. 2021 Oct 13;:1-25 [PMID: 34641992]
  4. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 23;9(8): [PMID: 34452058]
  5. Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Mar;187:111413 [PMID: 34866726]
  6. Sci Am. 1962 Oct;207:93-102 [PMID: 13892642]
  7. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;19(4):403-407 [PMID: 29398935]
  8. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(6):1210-1213 [PMID: 24187384]
  9. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jan;19(1):2-4 [PMID: 19158101]
  10. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 20;10(2): [PMID: 35214606]
  11. Front Psychol. 2013 May 21;4:279 [PMID: 23734136]
  12. Child Dev. 2011 Jul-Aug;82(4):1297-309 [PMID: 21679174]
  13. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89177 [PMID: 24586574]
  14. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):720-729 [PMID: 33821088]
  15. Am Psychol. 2017 Jul-Aug;72(5):459-473 [PMID: 28726454]
  16. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):384-405 [PMID: 29191107]
  17. J Res Adolesc. 2010 Mar 1;20(1):23-38 [PMID: 20209118]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;18(1): [PMID: 33396494]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationvaccinateactualsciencethinkingwillingnessconspiratorialreligiositydeclaredCOVID-19TrustConspiratorialassociatedtrustprogrampolled20216monthsintentundecidedunwillingThinkingReligiosityDeclaredAIMS:studyaimsinvestigateaffectedpeople'sonsetPolandconsistencyintentionMETHODS:longitudinaldesignrepresentativesample918membersPolishgeneralpopulationbeginningFebruarymassAugustmeasuredindividualvariables-trustRESULTS:ratehigherespeciallyinitiallygroupsHigherlowerclearlyCONCLUSIONS:effectiveindicatorimportantfactorsvaccinehesitancymaypossibilityinfluenceeventuallygetvaccinatedIntentionVaccinateActualVaccination-TheRoleScience

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)