OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of religion and health
Jun, 2024;63 (3): 2397-2412.

Emerging Adult Risky Sexual Behavior: The Influence of Perceived Parental Religiosity and Perceived Parent-Child Relationship Quality in the USA.

Ellie Holt, Cliff McKinney
Author Information
  1. Ellie Holt: Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA. ezh6@msstate.edu. ORCID
  2. Cliff McKinney: Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA.
PMID: 36853409 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01774-y

Abstract

In the southern USA, where religiosity is higher than in other parts of the country, many researchers have questioned if the religiosity of parents plays a role in emerging adults' risky sexual behavior (RSB). Specifically, research suggests that certain aspects of religiosity (i.e., conservatism) are especially detrimental when examining RSB. In the current study, college students (N���=���585, 65.5% women, 69.2% White, 25.0% Black) completed the following self-report measures: the Stearns-McKinney Assessment of Religious Traits - Short Form, the Parental Environment Questionnaire, and the Student Sexual Risks Scale. Results of path analysis (reported statistics have p���<���.05) indicated that perceived maternal relationship quality had a significant negative association with RSB in emerging adult women, �����=���-.27, and men, �����=���-.20; perceived paternal relationship quality also associated negatively with RSB in women, �����=���-.12, and men, �����=���-.20. Of all the parental religiosity variables, only perceived maternal conservatism had a significant effect, where it demonstrated a positive association with RSB in women, �����=���.34, and men, �����=���-.20. These results suggest that perceived parent-child relationship quality and perceived maternal conservative religiosity influence emerging adult RSB. This study presents novel insight into the specific aspects of perceived parental religiosity that, at least in the current study, are found to influence RSB.

Keywords

Gender Parenting Religiosity Risky sexual behavior

References

  1. Altenburger, L. E., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2018). Associations between maternal gatekeeping and fathers��� parenting quality. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 2678���2689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1107-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s10826-018-1107-3]
  2. Cederbaum, J. A., & Hutchinson, M. K. (2016). Parent���child communication about abstinence and safer sex in parochial school families. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 15(1), 48���68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2014.973135 [DOI: 10.1080/15381501.2014.973135]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021). Unintended Pregnancy. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/unintendedpregnancy/index.htm
  4. Coakley, T. M., Randolph, S., Shears, J., Beamon, E. R., Collins, P., & Sides, T. (2017). Parent-youth communication to reduce at-risk sexual behavior: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(6), 609���624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1313149 [DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2017.1313149]
  5. Coleman-Minahan, K. (2017). The socio-political context of migration and reproductive health disparities: The case of early sexual initiation among Mexican-origin immigrant young women. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 85���93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.011 [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.011]
  6. Coyne, S. M., Ward, L. M., Kroff, S. L., Davis, E. J., Holmgren, H. G., Jensen, A. C., Erickson, S. E., & Essig, L. W. (2019). Contributions of mainstream sexual media exposure to sexual attitudes, perceived peer norms, and sexual behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), 430���436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.016 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.016]
  7. Davidson, J. K., Moore, N. B., & Ullstrup, K. M. (2004). Religiosity and sexual responsibility: Relationships of choice American. Journal of Health Behavior, 28(4), 335���346. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.28.4.5 [DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.28.4.5]
  8. DeHart, D. D., & Birkimer, J. C. (1997). Trying to practice safer sex: Development of the Sexual Risks Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 34(1), 11���25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551860 [DOI: 10.1080/00224499709551860]
  9. DelPriore, D. J., & Schlomer, G. L. (2017). Impact of fathers on parental monitoring of daughters and their affiliation with sexually promiscuous peers: A genetically and environmentally controlled sibling study. Developmental Psychology, 53(7), 1330���1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000327 [DOI: 10.1037/dev0000327]
  10. East, P. L., & Hokoda, A. (2015). Risk and protective factors for sexual and dating violence victimization: A longitudinal, prospective study of Latino and African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(6), 1288���1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0273-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10964-015-0273-5]
  11. Elkins, I. J., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on parent���son relationships: Evidence for increasing genetic influence during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 351���363. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.2.351 [DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.2.351]
  12. Freeman, J. A. (2021). The influence of parental religiosity on the health of children during late adolescence/early adulthood: A test of mediation. Sociological Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121421990061 [DOI: 10.1177/0731121421990061]
  13. Gaunt, R. (2008). Maternal gatekeeping: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Family Issues, 29(3), 373���395. [DOI: 10.1177/0192513X07307851]
  14. Gibson, L. P., Denes, A., & Crowley, J. P. (2020). College women���s sexual and reproductive health screening behaviors and the role of mother���daughter communication. Journal of American College Health, 68(4), 357���365. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1549558 [DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1549558]
  15. Haglund, K. A., & Fehring, R. J. (2010). The association of religiosity, sexual education, and parental factors with risky sexual behaviors among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Religion and Health, 49, 460���470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9267-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10943-009-9267-5]
  16. Hannigan, L. J., McAdams, T. A., Plomin, R., & Eley, T. C. (2016). Etiological influences on perceptions of parenting: A longitudinal, multi-informant twin study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(12), 2387���2405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0419-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0419-0]
  17. Health News Hub (2021). 1 In 4 college students has an STD: Here Are the Facts. Hartford HealthCare. https://healthnewshub.org/campus-care-1-in-4-college-students-has-an-std-here-are-the-facts/
  18. Huggins, S. P., Rooney, M. E., & Chronis-Tuscano, A. (2015). Risky sexual behavior among college students with ADHD: Is the mother-child relationship protective? Journal of Attention Disorders, 19(3), 240���250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712459560 [DOI: 10.1177/1087054712459560]
  19. Jensen, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2014). Parents��� differential treatment and adolescents��� delinquent behaviors: Direct and indirect effects of difference-score and perception-based measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(4), 549���559. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036888 [DOI: 10.1037/a0036888]
  20. Kelley, H. H., Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2022). Uniting and dividing influences of religion on parent���child relationships in highly religious families. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 14(1), 128���139. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000321 [DOI: 10.1037/rel0000321]
  21. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press: New Jersey.
  22. LeJeune, B. C., Zimet, G. D., Azzouzz, F., Fortenberry, J. D., & Aalsma, M. C. (2011). Religiosity and sexual involvement within adolescent romantic couples. Journal of Religion and Health, 52, 804���816. [DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9512-6]
  23. Loewenthal, K. M., MacLeod, A. K., & Cinnirella, M. (2002). Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among different religious groups in the UK. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 133���139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00011-3 [DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00011-3]
  24. Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families, 1999���2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 805���827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x [DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x]
  25. Manlove, J., Logan, C., Moore, K. A., & Ikramullah, E. (2008). Pathways from family religiosity to adolescent sexual activity and contraceptive use. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40, 105���117. https://doi.org/10.1363/4010508 [DOI: 10.1363/4010508]
  26. McKinney, C., & Brown, K. (2017). Parenting and emerging adult internalizing problems: Regional differences suggest Southern parenting factor. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 3156���3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0749-x [DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0749-x]
  27. Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A. (2001). Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: A research synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 1���38. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0513 [DOI: 10.1006/drev.2000.0513]
  28. Moilanen, K. L. (2015). Predictors of parental consent for adolescent participation in sexual health���related research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(2), 157���168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615575510 [DOI: 10.1177/1556264615575510]
  29. Murray-Swank, A., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2006). Sanctification of parenting: Links to corporal punishment and parental warmth among biblically conservative and liberal mothers. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16(4), 271���287. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1604_3 [DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr1604_3]
  30. Penny, G., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2015). Why are women more religious than men? Testing the explanatory power of personality theory among undergraduate students in Wales. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 18(6), 492���502. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2015.1079603 [DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2015.1079603]
  31. Pew Research Center. (2022). Modeling the future of religion in America. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/
  32. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71���90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 [DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004]
  33. Quinn, D. A., & Lewin, A. (2019). Family religiosity, parental monitoring, and emerging adults��� sexual risk behavior. Religion and Family Life, 10(2), 1���16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020114 [DOI: 10.3390/rel10020114]
  34. Reynolds, C. J., Makhanova, A., Ng, Ben KL.., & Conway, P. (2020). Bound together for God and country: The binding moral foundations link unreflectiveness with religiosity and political conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109632 [DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109632]
  35. Rogers, M. M., & McKinney, C. (2019). Parent���child relationship quality and internalizing problems as predictors of risky sexual behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 40(12), 1656���1676. [DOI: 10.1177/0192513X19843156]
  36. Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medicine, 8, 3���15. [DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800102]
  37. Schnabel, L. (2015). How religious are American women and men? Gender differences and similarities. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(3), 616���622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12214 [DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12214]
  38. Schnabel, L. (2017). Gendered religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 59(4), 547���556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0302-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s13644-017-0302-9]
  39. Schnabel, L. (2018). More religious, less dogmatic: Toward a general framework for gender differences in religion. Social Science Research, 75, 58���72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.010 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.06.010]
  40. Schoppe-Sullivan, SJ, Altenberg LE, Lee MA, Bower DJ, Kamp DCM (2015) Who are the gatekeepers? Predictors of maternal gatekeeping. Parenting: Science and Practice. 15(3): 166���186. doi https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2015.1053321
  41. Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., & Peterson, F. R. (2008). The effect of religion on risky sexual behavior among college students. Deviant Behavior, 30(5), 467���485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620802296279 [DOI: 10.1080/01639620802296279]
  42. Stearns, M., & McKinney, C. (2018). The relationship between parent and child religiosity: Moderation by perceived parental antisocial problems. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(4), 225���239. [DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2018.1493663]
  43. Stearns, M., & McKinney, C. (2019). Perceived parent���child religiosity: Moderation by perceived maternal and paternal warmth and autonomy granting and emerging adult gender. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(3), 177���187. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000142 [DOI: 10.1037/rel0000142]
  44. Stearns, M., & McKinney, C. (2020a). Conflict associated with stronger parent-child religiosity in emerging adults, especially for sons. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12, 149���156. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000220 [DOI: 10.1037/rel0000220]
  45. Stearns, M., & McKinney, C. (2020b). Connection between parent-child religiosity: Moderated mediation by perceived maternal and paternal warmth and overprotection and emerging adult gender. Review of Religious Research, 62, 153���171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00404-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s13644-020-00404-3]
  46. Stearns, M., Moussa Rogers, M., & McKinney, C. (2021). Perceived significant other and personal religiosity traits that predict emerging adult risky sexual behavior. In E. M. Morgan & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Sexuality in emerging adulthood (pp. 373���386). Oxford University Press.

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Male
Young Adult
Parent-Child Relations
Sexual Behavior
United States
Surveys and Questionnaires
Adult
Students
Risk-Taking
Adolescent
Religion and Psychology
Parents
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RSBreligiosityperceived�����=���-womenemergingstudymaternalrelationshipqualitymen20USAsexualbehavioraspectsconservatismcurrentParentalSexualsignificantassociationadultparentalinfluenceRiskyPerceivedReligiositysouthernhigherpartscountrymanyresearchersquestionedparentsplaysroleadults'riskySpecificallyresearchsuggestscertainieespeciallydetrimentalexaminingcollegestudentsN���=���585655%692%White250%Blackcompletedfollowingself-reportmeasures:Stearns-McKinneyAssessmentReligiousTraits-ShortFormEnvironmentQuestionnaireStudentRisksScaleResultspathanalysisreportedstatisticsp���<���05indicatednegative27paternalalsoassociatednegatively12variableseffectdemonstratedpositive�����=���34resultssuggestparent-childconservativepresentsnovelinsightspecificleastfoundEmergingAdultBehavior:InfluenceParent-ChildRelationshipQualityGenderParenting

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.