Contact Sensitization to Allergens of Biological Origin from the Compositae Family and Original Extracts of Ubiquitous Weed Plants of Vojvodina among Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

Vujanović Ljuba, Jakovljević Sanja, Golušin Zoran, Levakov Olivera
Author Information
  1. Vujanović Ljuba: Departments of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Clinic of Dermatovenereology Diseases, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  2. Jakovljević Sanja: Departments of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Clinic of Dermatovenereology Diseases, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  3. Golušin Zoran: Departments of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Clinic of Dermatovenereology Diseases, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  4. Levakov Olivera: Departments of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Clinic of Dermatovenereology Diseases, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Abstract

Background: The use of alternative treatment methods, particularly medicinal herbs from the family Compositae, significantly contributes to the increase in the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis among patients with chronic venous insufficiency.
Objective: Estimating frequency of contact sensitization among patients with chronic venous insufficiency and determining the most common contact sensitizers from the series of bio-origin allergens from the Compositae family and ubiquitous weeds of Vojvodina.
Materials and Methods: The total number of 266 patients with suspected contact dermatitis was divided into two groups: the experimental group consisted of patients with chronic venous insufficiency (EG), and the control group consisted of patients without chronic venous insufficiency (CG). All subjects were tested with allergens of biological origin from the family Compositae, screening allergen SL-mix and original extracts of ubiquitous weed plants of Vojvodina.
Results: Patch test revealed a positive reaction to allergens of the Compositae family in 6.69% in the experimental group, and in 4.17% in the control group. The standardized response rate to the SL-mix in the experimental group was 2.07%, while in the control group, it was 1.51%. The presence of a positive reaction to at least one extract of ubiquitous weed plants of Vojvodina was determined in 6.11% in the experimental group, and in 3.23% of patients in the control group. No statistically significant difference in response rates was found between the examined groups.
Conclusions: Establishing the diagnosis of Compositae dermatitis can be supplemented by additional testing with weed plant extracts from a specific geographical area, resulting in the detection of novel unknown allergens.

Keywords

References

  1. Australas J Dermatol. 1999 Aug;40(3):123-8; quiz 129-30 [PMID: 10439521]
  2. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jun;138(6):1018-21 [PMID: 9747365]
  3. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Nov;81(5):368-373 [PMID: 31265134]
  4. Sci Pharm. 2013 Aug 15;81(3):807-18 [PMID: 24106675]
  5. Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Mar;78(3):185-193 [PMID: 29148057]
  6. Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Feb;56(2):94-8 [PMID: 17244077]
  7. Contact Dermatitis. 1999 Feb;40(2):72-6 [PMID: 10048650]
  8. Contact Dermatitis. 2003 May;48(5):261-5 [PMID: 12868967]
  9. Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Jan;58(1):32-6 [PMID: 18154556]
  10. Contact Dermatitis. 1994 Sep;31(3):151-3 [PMID: 7821006]
  11. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Oct;140(10):1241-6 [PMID: 15492187]
  12. Contact Dermatitis. 1999 May;40(5):273-6 [PMID: 10344483]
  13. Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Apr;54(4):196-201 [PMID: 16650094]
  14. Contact Dermatitis. 1990 May;22(5):249-52 [PMID: 2383982]
  15. Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Feb;78(2):101-108 [PMID: 29194657]
  16. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):18-24 [PMID: 11244135]
  17. Contact Dermatitis. 2002 May;46(5):286-9 [PMID: 12084082]
  18. Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Mar;38(3):140-6 [PMID: 9536405]
  19. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Apr;80(4):222-227 [PMID: 30378139]
  20. Int J Tissue React. 2005;27(3):101-6 [PMID: 16372475]
  21. Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Feb;54(2):100-5 [PMID: 16487282]
  22. Med Pregl. 2003 Jan-Feb;56(1-2):43-9 [PMID: 12793186]
  23. Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Mar;78(3):177-184 [PMID: 29214642]
  24. Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Jul;29(1):6-10 [PMID: 8365167]
  25. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(7):6290-6300 [PMID: 30666578]
  26. Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;51(3):101-10 [PMID: 15479198]
  27. Int J Dermatol. 2005 Dec;44(12):1006-9 [PMID: 16409265]
  28. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):1305-1312 [PMID: 27464585]
  29. Contact Dermatitis. 1999 May;40(5):277-8 [PMID: 10344484]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupCompositaepatientscontactdermatitischronicvenousinsufficiencyVojvodinafamilyallergensubiquitousexperimentalcontrolweedamongplantsconsistedSL-mixextractspositivereaction6responseBackground:usealternativetreatmentmethodsparticularlymedicinalherbssignificantlycontributesincreaseincidenceallergicObjective:Estimatingfrequencysensitizationdeterminingcommonsensitizersseriesbio-originweedsMaterialsMethods:totalnumber266suspecteddividedtwogroups:EGwithoutCGsubjectstestedbiologicaloriginscreeningallergenoriginalResults:Patchtestrevealed69%417%standardizedrate207%151%presenceleastoneextractdetermined11%323%statisticallysignificantdifferenceratesfoundexaminedgroupsConclusions:EstablishingdiagnosiscansupplementedadditionaltestingplantspecificgeographicalarearesultingdetectionnovelunknownContactSensitizationAllergensBiologicalOriginFamilyOriginalExtractsUbiquitousWeedPlantsPatientsChronicVenousInsufficiencyAllergic

Similar Articles

Cited By