Mind matters: A narrative review on affective state-dependency in non-invasive brain stimulation.

Dennis J L G Schutter, Fenne Smits, Jana Klaus
Author Information
  1. Dennis J L G Schutter: Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  2. Fenne Smits: Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  3. Jana Klaus: Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Variability in findings related to non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) have increasingly been described as a result of differences in neurophysiological state. Additionally, there is some evidence suggesting that individual differences in psychological states may correlate with the magnitude and directionality of effects of NIBS on the neural and behavioural level. In this narrative review, it is proposed that the assessment of baseline affective states can quantify non-reductive properties which are not readily accessible to neuroscientific methods. Particularly, affective-related states are theorized to correlate with physiological, behavioural and phenomenological effects of NIBS. While further systematic research is needed, baseline psychological states are suggested to provide a complementary cost-effective source of information for understanding variability in NIBS outcomes. Implementing measures of psychological state may potentially contribute to increasing the sensitivity and specificity of results in experimental and clinical NIBS studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):24011 [PMID: 34907209]
  2. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1048-1057 [PMID: 28766117]
  3. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Aug;23(8):459-475 [PMID: 35577959]
  4. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Mar;7(3):302-311 [PMID: 34273556]
  5. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb;20(1):103-114 [PMID: 31898055]
  6. Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 31;3:303 [PMID: 22969736]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 May;32(5):906-916 [PMID: 31905092]
  8. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep 1;50(5):377-82 [PMID: 11543742]
  9. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2017 Jul-Sep;39(3):147-157 [PMID: 28813110]
  10. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1992-1998 [PMID: 27510494]
  11. Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:568-574 [PMID: 28572072]
  12. Psychosom Med. 2008 May;70(4):404-9 [PMID: 18434490]
  13. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 May;29(5):574-80 [PMID: 17557298]
  14. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Feb 3;17(1):15-25 [PMID: 32734295]
  15. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec;9(4):380-8 [PMID: 19897791]
  16. Brain Topogr. 2008 Sep;21(1):1-10 [PMID: 18791818]
  17. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1824-30 [PMID: 21414332]
  18. Neuroscientist. 2022 Jul 29;:10738584221113806 [PMID: 35904354]
  19. Brain Stimul. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):1088-1090 [PMID: 35921958]
  20. Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Feb;55(3):762-777 [PMID: 34978110]
  21. Brain Stimul. 2017 May - Jun;10(3):604-608 [PMID: 28040450]
  22. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Jan;36(1):60-7 [PMID: 20599325]
  23. Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 1;109:140-50 [PMID: 25613437]
  24. Brain Stimul. 2011 Apr;4(2):97-103 [PMID: 21511210]
  25. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109687 [PMID: 31356848]
  26. J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 30;33(44):17483-9 [PMID: 24174681]
  27. Neuromodulation. 2019 Dec;22(8):884-893 [PMID: 29741803]
  28. J Neurol. 2010 Aug;257(8):1362-8 [PMID: 20352252]
  29. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 02;15:802244 [PMID: 34924982]
  30. Psychophysiology. 2016 Sep;53(9):1307-16 [PMID: 27325519]
  31. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 1;76(3):176-85 [PMID: 24388670]
  32. Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2110-28 [PMID: 22677148]
  33. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22812 [PMID: 21829522]
  34. Psychophysiology. 2008 May;45(3):345-8 [PMID: 18221448]
  35. Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):187-99 [PMID: 17640522]
  36. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Aug;140:59-97 [PMID: 35738037]
  37. Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 21;30(18):3672-3679.e4 [PMID: 32735813]
  38. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Jul;126:73-80 [PMID: 32422456]
  39. J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120121 [PMID: 34998239]
  40. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 [PMID: 10990547]
  41. Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jan;171:1-11 [PMID: 34808142]
  42. J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):305-6 [PMID: 6886962]
  43. Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):777-88 [PMID: 9682533]
  44. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Mar;7(3):342-7 [PMID: 21421731]
  45. Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(11):969-76 [PMID: 18046733]
  46. Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:156-170 [PMID: 30343211]
  47. Neuroimage. 2022 Dec 1;264:119713 [PMID: 36309333]
  48. Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 07;12:999 [PMID: 30666182]
  49. Neurosci Lett. 2013 Feb 8;534:306-10 [PMID: 23291399]
  50. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:524-534 [PMID: 30227147]
  51. J Affect Disord. 2006 Apr;91(2-3):229-34 [PMID: 16487598]
  52. Appetite. 2019 May 1;136:1-7 [PMID: 30611756]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stimulationNIBSbrainstatesnon-invasivedifferencesstatepsychologicaltranscranialmaycorrelateeffectsbehaviouralnarrativereviewbaselineaffectiveVariabilityfindingsrelatedincreasinglydescribedresultneurophysiologicalAdditionallyevidencesuggestingindividualmagnitudedirectionalityneurallevelproposedassessmentcanquantifynon-reductivepropertiesreadilyaccessibleneuroscientificmethodsParticularlyaffective-relatedtheorizedphysiologicalphenomenologicalsystematicresearchneededsuggestedprovidecomplementarycost-effectivesourceinformationunderstandingvariabilityoutcomesImplementingmeasurespotentiallycontributeincreasingsensitivityspecificityresultsexperimentalclinicalstudiesMindmatters:state-dependencyEmbodimentEmotionIndividualNon-invasivePsychologicalTMSmagnetictDCSdirectcurrenttESelectric

Similar Articles

Cited By