Amphetamine-Related Emergency Department Visits in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2020.

James A G Crispo, Lisa Liu, Paxton Bach, Dominique R Ansell, Branavan Sivapathasundaram, Francis Nguyen, Paul Kurdyak, Dallas P Seitz, Michael Conlon, Jacquelyn J Cragg
Author Information
  1. James A G Crispo: Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  2. Lisa Liu: Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  3. Paxton Bach: Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  4. Dominique R Ansell: Emergency Department, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
  5. Branavan Sivapathasundaram: ICES McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  6. Francis Nguyen: ICES McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  7. Paul Kurdyak: ICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  8. Dallas P Seitz: Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  9. Michael Conlon: Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
  10. Jacquelyn J Cragg: Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite unregulated amphetamine use increasing, there are limited data on related emergency department (ED) visits in Canada. Our primary objective was to examine trends in amphetamine-related ED visits over time in Ontario, including by age and sex. Secondary objectives were to examine whether patient characteristics were associated with ED revisit within 6 months.
METHODS: Using administrative claims and census data, we calculated annual patient- and encounter-based rates of amphetamine-related ED visits from 2003 to 2020 among individuals 18+ years of age. We also performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals with amphetamine-related ED visits between 2019 and 2020 to determine whether select factors were associated with ED revisit within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to measure associations.
RESULTS: The population-based rate of amphetamine-related ED visits increased nearly 15-fold between 2003 (1.9/100,000 Ontarians) and 2020 (27.9/100,000 Ontarians). Seventy-five percent of individuals returned to the ED for any reason within 6 months. Psychosis and use of other substances were both independently associated with ED revisit for any reason within 6 months (psychosis: AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.30-1.83; other substances: AOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.57-2.15), whereas having a primary care physician was negatively associated with ED revisit (AOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing rates of amphetamine-related ED visits in Ontario are cause for concern. Diagnoses of psychosis and the use of other substances may serve to identify individuals who are most likely to benefit from both primary and substance-specific care.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885 [PMID: 26440803]
  2. Can Fam Physician. 2019 May;65(5):343-351 [PMID: 31088874]
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(12):1336-1345 [PMID: 31162887]
  4. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 1;78(12):1329-1342 [PMID: 34550301]
  5. Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):89-106 [PMID: 14667423]
  6. Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jun 5;14(1):31 [PMID: 28583136]
  7. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:14-20 [PMID: 30326396]
  8. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Nov;39(7):932-940 [PMID: 32666650]
  9. J Addict. 2017;2017:4050932 [PMID: 28913001]
  10. PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252090 [PMID: 34038452]
  11. BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e060447 [PMID: 35501101]
  12. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 12;70(6):202-207 [PMID: 33571180]
  13. Epidemiol Rev. 2020 Jan 31;42(1):154-166 [PMID: 33511987]
  14. J Drug Issues. 2010 Dec;40(1):7-26 [PMID: 21052519]
  15. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215902 [PMID: 33852001]
  16. PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 1;18(6):e1003631 [PMID: 34061846]
  17. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Jul;39(5):505-518 [PMID: 32212214]
  18. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183758 [PMID: 30646256]

Grants

  1. 201909MPU/CIHR

MeSH Term

Humans
Ontario
Retrospective Studies
Amphetamine
Logistic Models
Emergency Service, Hospital

Chemicals

Amphetamine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EDvisitsamphetamine-relatedOntarioassociatedrevisitwithin6monthsindividualsuseprimary202095%dataemergencydepartmentCanadaexamineagewhetherrates20039/100000OntariansreasonsubstancesAOR = 1CI = 1careOBJECTIVES:DespiteunregulatedamphetamineincreasinglimitedrelatedobjectivetrendstimeincludingsexSecondaryobjectivespatientcharacteristicsMETHODS:Usingadministrativeclaimscensuscalculatedannualpatient-encounter-basedamong18+yearsalsoperformedretrospectivecohortstudy2019determineselectfactorsMultivariablelogisticregressionmodellingusedmeasureassociationsRESULTS:population-basedrateincreasednearly15-fold127Seventy-fivepercentreturnedPsychosisindependentlypsychosis:5430-183substances:8457-215whereasphysiciannegativelyAOR = 077CI = 060-098CONCLUSIONS:IncreasingcauseconcernDiagnosespsychosismayserveidentifylikelybenefitsubstance-specificAmphetamine-RelatedEmergencyDepartmentVisits2003-2020amphetaminesmarginalization

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)