Determination of Foetal Scalp Blood Sampling pH as an Indicator of Loss of Foetal Well-Being in Women Undergoing Caesarean Section.

Raquel Alarcón-Rodríguez, María Paz Martín-Álvarez, Jessica García-González, Mar Requena-Mullor, Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García, Ruirui Zheng, Raúl Romero-Del Rey
Author Information
  1. Raquel Alarcón-Rodríguez: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  2. María Paz Martín-Álvarez: Midwife in Poniente Hospital, 04700 Almería, Spain.
  3. Jessica García-González: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  4. Mar Requena-Mullor: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  5. Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  6. Ruirui Zheng: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
  7. Raúl Romero-Del Rey: Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

Asphyxia during birth is one of the three leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality among newborns carried to term. The objective of this study was to evaluate the measurement of the foetal scalp blood pH as a measure of foetal status, evaluating: cord gases, meconium-stained fluid, APGAR score or the need for neonatal resuscitation in pregnant women undergoing caesarean sections. A cross-sectional study was carried out over a period of 5 years (2017-2021) at the Hospital de Poniente (southern Spain). A total of 127 pregnant women participated from whom a foetal scalp blood pH sample was taken and used to indicate the need for an urgent caesarean section. The results showed a correlation between the pH of the scalp blood and the pH of the umbilical cord artery, umbilical cord vein (Rho of Spearman arterial pH: 0.64, < 0.001; Rho of Spearman venous pH: 0.58, < 0.001) and the APGAR test one minute after delivery (Spearman's Rho coefficient of 0.33, < 0.01). These results suggest that the foetal scalp pH should not be considered a foolproof method to indicate an urgent caesarean section. Foetal scalp pH sampling can be used as a complementary test, in conjunction with cardiotocography, to indicate whether an emergency caesarean section is necessary due to loss of foetal well-being.

Keywords

References

  1. J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 1;45(3):315-320 [PMID: 27718493]
  2. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jan;93(1):113-7 [PMID: 24116986]
  3. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:153-158 [PMID: 34216939]
  4. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Apr- Jun;32(2):189-193 [PMID: 32583992]
  5. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):13-24 [PMID: 26433401]
  6. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Dec;31(23):3166-3171 [PMID: 28782450]
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;84(1):115-20 [PMID: 8008304]
  8. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Nov;30(21):2539-2544 [PMID: 27884069]
  9. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:98-106 [PMID: 26188689]
  10. BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1056-60; discussion 1060-2 [PMID: 24597746]
  11. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8839 [PMID: 29245247]
  12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:62-67 [PMID: 31229725]
  13. Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;29(1):7-18 [PMID: 21833896]
  14. J Pediatr. 1980 Jul;97(1):103-7 [PMID: 6991659]
  15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):142-5 [PMID: 23270744]
  16. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jun;156(2):137-9 [PMID: 21300427]
  17. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Sep;25(9):667-70 [PMID: 26374363]
  18. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Mar;37(3):207-213 [PMID: 26001867]
  19. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Feb;54(1):79-83 [PMID: 24471849]
  20. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):548-55 [PMID: 24806978]
  21. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;127(4):674-680 [PMID: 26959212]
  22. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Jul;31(13):1742-1747 [PMID: 28475393]
  23. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;294(4):763-70 [PMID: 26969647]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD006174 [PMID: 20238343]
  25. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2012 Sep;1(3):161-164 [PMID: 31214402]
  26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:62-7 [PMID: 26253238]
  27. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr;50(4):101964 [PMID: 33130281]
  28. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):823-827 [PMID: 30190735]
  29. Lancet. 2014 Nov 15;384(9956):1749-55 [PMID: 25236409]
  30. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;31(4):328-337 [PMID: 28493508]
  31. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1529-1532 [PMID: 33235569]
  32. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;99(1):129-34 [PMID: 11777523]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pHfoetal0scalpcaesareanbloodsectioncordAPGARindicateRho<FoetaloneneonatalcarriedstudyscoreneedpregnantwomenusedurgentresultsumbilicalSpearmanpH:001testAsphyxiabirththreeleadingcausesmorbiditymortalityamongnewbornstermobjectiveevaluatemeasurementmeasurestatusevaluating:gasesmeconium-stainedfluidresuscitationundergoingsectionscross-sectionalperiod5years2017-2021HospitaldePonientesouthernSpaintotal127participatedsampletakenshowedcorrelationarteryveinarterial64venous58minutedeliverySpearman'scoefficient3301suggestconsideredfoolproofmethodsamplingcancomplementaryconjunctioncardiotocographywhetheremergencynecessaryduelosswell-beingDeterminationScalpBloodSamplingIndicatorLossWell-BeingWomenUndergoingCaesareanSectionacademiagasanalysisdistresshypoxia

Similar Articles

Cited By