Butterfly needle tap and suction (BTS) technique: a treatment for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma after burr hole craniostomy.

Shun Yamamoto, Yoshitaka Nagashima, Hideki Maki, Yusuke Nishimura, Yoshio Araki, Masahiro Nishihori, Tomoyuki Noda, Tasuku Imai, Teppei Kawabata, Masahiro Ueno, Yasumasa Nishida, Ryuta Saito
Author Information
  1. Shun Yamamoto: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan. ORCID
  2. Yoshitaka Nagashima: Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. y-nagashima@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp. ORCID
  3. Hideki Maki: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  4. Yusuke Nishimura: Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  5. Yoshio Araki: Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  6. Masahiro Nishihori: Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  7. Tomoyuki Noda: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  8. Tasuku Imai: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  9. Teppei Kawabata: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  10. Masahiro Ueno: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  11. Yasumasa Nishida: Department of Neurosurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
  12. Ryuta Saito: Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we propose a butterfly needle tap and suction (BTS) technique for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) as an alternative to reoperation with burr hole craniostomy (BHC) and investigate its efficacy and safety. The procedure involves percutaneous puncture through the burr hole created during the previous surgery and subsequent hematoma evacuation using a butterfly needle.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent BTS for CSDH at Ogaki Municipal Hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. The follow-up CT scans were reviewed after several weeks. We evaluated the number of percutaneous punctures required to resolve CSDH during the BTS technique, the volume of the evacuated hematoma, and procedure-related complications.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 21 of whom achieved resolution of the hematoma using punctures with the BTS technique alone (mean, 2.2 ± 1.5). Five patients had a recurrence of hematoma after one or more punctures during the BTS technique, and they underwent reoperation with BHC according to the surgeon's decision or patient requests. Among the 55 punctures, 43.0 ± 16.0 ml of hematoma was evacuated per puncture. The evacuated hematoma volume was 41.9 ± 16.4 ml in the BTS-alone group and 49.4 ± 12.9 ml in the reoperation group, with no significant difference (p = 0.25). Three patients complained of a headache during the puncture procedure, and no other complications, including intracranial hemorrhage or infection, were reported therein.
CONCLUSIONS: The BTS technique is an effective alternative to reoperation with BHC.

Keywords

References

  1. Aaron A (2013) Cohen-Gadol: remote contralateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage after overdrainage of a chronic subdural hematoma. Int J Surg Case Rep 4:834–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.06.014 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.06.014]
  2. Almenawer SA, Farrokhyar F, Hong C, Alhazzani W, Manoranjan B, Yarascavitch B, Arjmand P, Baronia B, Reddy K, Murty N, Singh S (2014) Chronic subdural hematoma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34,829 patients. Ann Surg 259:449–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000255 [DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000255]
  3. Chon K-H, Lee JM, Koh EJ, Choi HY (2012) Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:1541–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1399-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1399-9]
  4. Ducruet AF, Grobelny BT, Zacharia BE, Hickman ZL, DeRosa PL, Andersen KN, Sussman E, Carpenter A, Connolly ES Jr (2012) The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Rev 5:155–69; discussion 169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-011-0349-y
  5. Holl DC, Volovici V, Dirven CMF, Peul WC, van Kooten F, Jellema K, van der Gaag NA, Miah IP, Kho KH, den Hertog HM, Lingsma HF, Dammers R (2018) Pathophysiology and nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: from past to present to future. World Neurosurg 116:402-411.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.037 [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.037]
  6. Jones S, Kafetz K (1999) A prospective study of chronic subdural haematomas in elderly patients. Age Ageing 28:519–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/28.6.519 [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/28.6.519]
  7. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR`for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244 [DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244]
  8. Kaneshiro Y, Yamauchi S, Urano Y, Murata K (2019) Remote hemorrhage after burr-hole surgery for chronic subdural hematoma: a report of two cases. Surg Neurol Int 10:18. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_108_18 [DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_108_18]
  9. Lee JY, Kim B-T, Hwang S-C, Im S-B, Shin D-S, Shin W-H (2012) Indications and surgical results of twist-drill craniostomy at the pre-coronal point for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma patients. Società 52:133–137. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.2.133 [DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.2.133]
  10. Lega BC, Danish SF, Malhotra NR, Sonnad SS, Stein SC (2010) Choosing the best operation for chronic subdural hematoma: a decision analysis. J Neurosurg 113:615–621. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.JNS08825 [DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.JNS08825]
  11. Leroy HA, Aboukaïs R, Reyns N, Bourgeois P, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Lejeune JP (2015) Predictors of functional outcomes and recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas. J Clin Neurosci 22:1895–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.064 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.064]
  12. Mori K, Maeda M (2001) Surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in 500 consecutive cases: clinical characteristics, surgical outcome, complications, and recurrence rate. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo) 41:371–381. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.41.371 [DOI: 10.2176/nmc.41.371]
  13. Reinges MH, Hasselberg I, Rohde V, Küker W, Gilsbach JM (2000) Prospective analysis of bedside percutaneous subdural tapping for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.69.1.40 [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.40]
  14. Sakurai S, Kamiyama K, Osato T, Ogino T, Endo H, Mikamoto M, Takahira K, Asanome T, Nakamura H (2016) Retrospective analysis of recurrence risk factors for chronic subdural hematoma. Jpn J Neurosurg(Tokyo) 25:748–753. https://doi.org/10.7887/jcns.25.748 [DOI: 10.7887/jcns.25.748]
  15. Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P, Richards HK, Marcus H, Parker RA, Price SJ, Kirollos RW, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ (2009) Use of drain versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61115-6 [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61115-6]
  16. Sucu HK, Gokmen M, Ergin A, Bezircioglu H, Gokmen A (2007) Is there a way to avoid surgical complications of twist drill craniostomy for evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma? Acta Neurochir(Wien) 149:597–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1162-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s00701-007-1162-9]
  17. Thavara BD, Kidangan GS, Rajagopalawarrier B (2019) Comparative study of single burr-hole craniostomy versus twist-drill craniostomy in patients with chronic subdural hematoma. Asian J Neurosurg 14:513–521. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_37_19 [DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_37_19]
  18. Uno M, Toi H, Hirai S (2017) Chronic subdural hematoma in elderly patients: is this disease benign? Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo) 57:402–409. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0337 [DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0337]
  19. Weigel R, Schmeiedek P, Krauss JK (2003) Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:937–943. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.7.937 [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.937]
  20. Xu CS, Lu M, Liu LY, Yao MY, Cheng GL, Tian XY, Xiao F, Wan Q, Chen F (2017) Chronic subdural hematoma management: clarifying the definitions of outcome measures to better understand treatment efficacy – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21:809–818 [PMID: 28272701]
  21. Xu C, Chen B, Xue L, Xia L, Yang X, Wei M, Hui X, Chen Q, Zheng J, Li Z, Tian X, Cheng G, Xiao F, Lu M (2018) Randomized controlled study on the curative effects of twist-drill craniotomy and burr hole craniotomy in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Exp Ther Med 16:959–965. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6265 [DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6265]
  22. Yagnik KJ, Goyal A, Van Gompel JJ (2021) Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir 163:3229–3241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05019-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05019-3]
  23. Yoo M, Kim J-S (2018) Rapid spontaneous resolution of contralateral acute subdural hemnorrhage caused by overdrainage of chronic subdural hemorrhage. J Neurocrit Care 11:119–123. https://doi.org/10.18700/jnc.180051 [DOI: 10.18700/jnc.180051]
  24. Yoshino Y, Aoki N, Oikawa A, Ohno K (2000) Acute epidural hematoma developing during twist-drill craniostomy: a complication of percutaneous subdural tapping for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Surg Neurol 53:601–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00240-8 [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00240-8]

MeSH Term

Humans
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
Suction
Craniotomy
Retrospective Studies
Trephining
Drainage
Treatment Outcome
Recurrence

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hematomaBTStechniqueneedlereoperationholecraniostomypuncturepatientspuncturesstudysubduralCSDHburrBHCevacuatedbutterflytapsuctionrecurrentchronicalternativeprocedurepercutaneoususingunderwentvolumecomplicationsgroupButterflyBACKGROUND:proposeinvestigateefficacysafetyinvolvescreatedprevioussurgerysubsequentevacuationMETHODS:retrospectiveincludedOgakiMunicipalHospitalJanuary2017December2020follow-upCTscansreviewedseveralweeksevaluatednumberrequiredresolveprocedure-relatedRESULTS:Twenty-sixenrolled21achievedresolutionalonemean22 ± 15Fiverecurrenceoneaccordingsurgeon'sdecisionpatientrequestsAmong55430 ± 160 mlper419 ± 164 mlBTS-alone494 ± 129 mlsignificantdifferencep = 025ThreecomplainedheadacheincludingintracranialhemorrhageinfectionreportedthereinCONCLUSIONS:effectivetechnique:treatmentBurrChronicPercutaneousTwistdrill

Similar Articles

Cited By