Mental health of public safety personnel: Developing a model of operational, organizational, and personal factors in public safety organizations.

Megan Edgelow, Agnieszka Fecica, Caroline Kohlen, Kirandeep Tandal
Author Information
  1. Megan Edgelow: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  2. Agnieszka Fecica: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  3. Caroline Kohlen: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  4. Kirandeep Tandal: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Abstract

The work of public safety personnel (PSP) such as police officers, firefighters, correctional officers, and paramedics, as well as other PSP, makes them vulnerable to psychological injuries, which can have profound impacts on their families and the communities they serve. A multitude of complex operational, organizational, and personal factors contribute to the mental health of PSP; however, to date the approach of the research community has been largely to explore the impacts of these factors separately or within single PSP professions. To date, PSP employers have predominantly focused on addressing the personal aspects of PSP mental health through resiliency and stress management interventions. However, the increasing number of psychological injuries among PSPs and the compounding stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate a need for a new approach to the study of PSP mental health. The following paper discusses the importance of adopting a broader conceptual approach to the study of PSP mental health and proposes a novel model that highlights the need to consider the combined impacts of operational, organizational, and personal factors on PSP mental health. The i-perational-rganizational-ersonal Factor Model (TROOP) depicts these key factors as three large pieces of a larger puzzle that is PSP mental health. The TROOP gives working language for public safety organizations, leaders, and researchers to broadly consider the mental health impacts of public safety work.

Keywords

References

  1. J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):197-206 [PMID: 32617784]
  2. J Crim Justice. 2020 Sep-Oct;70:101717 [PMID: 32836499]
  3. Work. 2015;50(1):59-71 [PMID: 25167907]
  4. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 14;29(2):223-240 [PMID: 35755149]
  5. Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):432-445 [PMID: 33604596]
  6. Work. 2020;67(2):295-312 [PMID: 33044211]
  7. Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):749-52 [PMID: 16181434]
  8. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Feb;21(2):138-143 [PMID: 29048939]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):1286 [PMID: 31615479]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8): [PMID: 33920704]
  11. Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt A):73-83 [PMID: 27890162]
  12. Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;63(1):54-64 [PMID: 28845686]
  13. Stress Health. 2021 Oct;37(4):613-630 [PMID: 34597464]
  14. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):215-26 [PMID: 16004656]
  15. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):346-355 [PMID: 30118629]
  16. Probat J. 2022 Mar;69(1):86-106 [PMID: 35340787]
  17. Police Pract Res. 2020;21(6):702-716 [PMID: 33408592]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;18(12): [PMID: 34208321]
  19. Cogn Behav Ther. 2022 Jan;51(1):3-20 [PMID: 33554743]
  20. Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Oct;60(7):560-5 [PMID: 20819805]
  21. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):e325-34 [PMID: 27483335]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21): [PMID: 36360872]
  23. Am J Ind Med. 2021 May;64(5):414-430 [PMID: 33503677]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4): [PMID: 32075062]
  25. Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:694-704 [PMID: 22269559]
  26. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2019;74(4):215-222 [PMID: 29068787]
  27. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Mar;95(2):425-435 [PMID: 33987771]
  28. J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):688-700 [PMID: 31553502]
  29. Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Apr 20;70(2):131-134 [PMID: 32020193]
  30. Occup Med (Lond). 2021 Nov 6;71(8):351-357 [PMID: 34415342]
  31. Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2470-2477 [PMID: 28964511]
  32. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Apr;53(2):127-42 [PMID: 16012372]
  33. Saf Health Work. 2015 Mar;6(1):25-9 [PMID: 25830066]
  34. Psychol Trauma. 2016 May;8(3):343-7 [PMID: 26460494]
  35. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(4):135-45 [PMID: 11842701]
  36. J Police Crim Psychol. 2022;37(1):173-182 [PMID: 34776601]
  37. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 01;17(13): [PMID: 32630259]
  38. Psychol Rep. 2010 Feb;106(1):19-26 [PMID: 20402422]
  39. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Dec;32(6):828-835 [PMID: 30454624]
  40. BMJ. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):480 [PMID: 12946970]
  41. Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Oct 27;70(7):496-502 [PMID: 32804235]
  42. JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jun 16;20(1):229-237 [PMID: 34137740]
  43. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):122-9 [PMID: 20042239]
  44. CJEM. 2016 May;18(3):205-12 [PMID: 26324392]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mental Health
Pandemics
COVID-19
Police
Occupations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PSPhealthmentalpublicsafetyfactorsimpactsorganizationalpersonaloperationalapproachworkpersonnelofficerspsychologicalinjuriesdateneedstudymodelconsiderTROOPorganizationspolicefirefighterscorrectionalparamedicswellmakesvulnerablecanprofoundfamiliescommunitiesservemultitudecomplexcontributehoweverresearchcommunitylargelyexploreseparatelywithinsingleprofessionsemployerspredominantlyfocusedaddressingaspectsresiliencystressmanagementinterventionsHoweverincreasingnumberamongPSPscompoundingstressorsCOVID-19pandemicdemonstratenewfollowingpaperdiscussesimportanceadoptingbroaderconceptualproposesnovelhighlightscombinedi-perational-rganizational-ersonalFactorModeldepictskeythreelargepieceslargerpuzzlegivesworkinglanguageleadersresearchersbroadlyMentalpersonnel:Developingoccupational

Similar Articles

Cited By