A biphasic relational approach to the evolution of human consciousness: Un enfoque relacional bifásico para la evolución de la conciencia humana.

Steven C Hayes, Stefan G Hofmann
Author Information
  1. Steven C Hayes: University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
  2. Stefan G Hofmann: Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.

Abstract

Background/objective: Human consciousness is arguably unique, and its features are hard to explain. Continuous and discrete accounts of consciousness are commonly viewed as incompatible, but both have limitations. Continuous accounts cannot readily account for what appears to be unique about human consciousness; discrete accounts have a hard time explaining how human consciousness could have evolved. The present position paper shows how both continuous and discontinuously elements can be combined.
Method: A biphasic model is constructed by unifying complex systems theory, the evolution of symbolic reasoning as a relational extension of human cooperation, and evolutionary science. The application of this approach to modern views of consciousness is then explored.
Results: Our analysis suggests that human consciousness may be viewed as a discontinuous event, that emerged from continuous foundations. This biphasic account contains processes that can be targeted clinically. For example, developmentally delayed children with problems in consciousness may be helped by targeting the processes the present account suggests are important at different levels of complexity.
Conclusions: This biphasic relational approach fits with the evolutionary record and with data on human cognitive development. It may be useful in guiding clinical intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243-57 [PMID: 3805973]
  2. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Apr;31(2):109-30; discussion 130-178 [PMID: 18479531]
  3. Neurosci Conscious. 2022 Aug 12;2022(1):niac011 [PMID: 35975240]
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;373(1755): [PMID: 30061459]
  5. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):104-107 [PMID: 30944453]
  6. Behav Anal Pract. 2018 May 31;11(4):411-416 [PMID: 30538917]
  7. Bioessays. 2009 Jul;31(7):715-26 [PMID: 19472370]
  8. Neuron. 2014 Feb 5;81(3):700-13 [PMID: 24485097]
  9. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 12;13:917199 [PMID: 35923458]
  10. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735 [PMID: 16262930]
  11. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Nov;13(11):1124-38 [PMID: 14576205]
  12. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):45-71 [PMID: 17471793]
  13. Conscious Cogn. 2014 Nov;30:133-41 [PMID: 25286242]
  14. Behav Res Ther. 2022 Sep;156:104155 [PMID: 35863243]
  15. Science. 2017 Oct 27;358(6362):486-492 [PMID: 29074769]
  16. Eye (Lond). 2018 Feb;32(2):302-313 [PMID: 29052606]
  17. Biol Bull. 2008 Dec;215(3):216-42 [PMID: 19098144]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Sep;88(2):179-97 [PMID: 17970414]
  19. Q Rev Biol. 2002 Sep;77(3):261-95 [PMID: 12365352]
  20. J R Soc Interface. 2011 May 6;8(58):609-29 [PMID: 21247947]
  21. Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 24;11(5): [PMID: 33923218]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Aug;15(8):365-73 [PMID: 21737339]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 11;119(41):e2200689119 [PMID: 36191229]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8520-5 [PMID: 12829797]
  25. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 22;2:2398212818816019 [PMID: 32166164]
  26. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):631-42 [PMID: 23359420]
  27. J Intell. 2022 Aug 02;10(3): [PMID: 35997406]
  28. Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Mar 25;14(2):295-323 [PMID: 34150448]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 7;114(10):E2016-E2025 [PMID: 28202735]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:145-73 [PMID: 12359915]
  31. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716 [PMID: 18771388]
  32. J Theor Biol. 2010 Sep 7;266(1):11-20 [PMID: 20558182]
  33. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Jul;23(7):439-452 [PMID: 35505255]
  34. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):201-39 [PMID: 8245768]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2116933119 [PMID: 35486693]
  36. Learn Behav. 2023 Jan 3;: [PMID: 36597002]
  37. Neuron. 2020 Mar 4;105(5):776-798 [PMID: 32135090]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0consciousnesshumanbiphasicaccountsaccountrelationalapproachmayuniquehardContinuousdiscreteviewedpresentcontinuouscanevolutionevolutionarysciencesuggestsprocesseslaBackground/objective:HumanarguablyfeaturesexplaincommonlyincompatiblelimitationsreadilyappearstimeexplainingevolvedpositionpapershowsdiscontinuouslyelementscombinedMethod:modelconstructedunifyingcomplexsystemstheorysymbolicreasoningextensioncooperationapplicationmodernviewsexploredResults:analysisdiscontinuouseventemergedfoundationscontainstargetedclinicallyexampledevelopmentallydelayedchildrenproblemshelpedtargetingimportantdifferentlevelscomplexityConclusions:fitsrecorddatacognitivedevelopmentusefulguidingclinicalinterventionconsciousness:UnenfoquerelacionalbifásicoparaevolucióndeconcienciahumanaConsciousnessDimensionEvolutionaryProcesses

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)