Influencing factors of humanistic care ability and its dimensions among mental health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional study.

Xiaolin Liu, Hongjin Zhu
Author Information
  1. Xiaolin Liu: Rehabilitation Department, Jinzi Mountain Hospital of Chongqing Mental Health Center, No.102, Jinzi Mountain, Jiangbei District, Chongqing, 401147, China. 9620790@qq.com.
  2. Hongjin Zhu: Nursing College of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In psychiatric services, humanistic care ability significantly affects the quality of the therapeutic relationship and thus affects the therapeutic outcomes for patients. Mental health workers may be confronted with more obstacles in humanistic care during the COVID-19 pandemic wherethe authors aimed to explore the capacity level of humanistic care among mental health workers and its potential influencing factors.
METHOD(S): An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 262 mental health workers working in Chongqing, China, from December 2020 to January 2021. Data were collected by the Caring Ability Inventory (CAI), the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of humanistic care ability.
RESULTS: Mental health workers' humanistic care ability is at a low level, with a score of 186.47 ± 21.34. Psychological capital is positively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = 0.41 [0.46-0.77], p < 0.001), and its two dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = 0.51 [0.30-0.47], p < 0.001; patience: β[95%CI] = 0.48 [0.17-0.28], p < 0.001). Psychoticism is negatively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = -0.28 [-5.18 - -2.51], p < 0.001) and its three dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = -0.12 [-1.57 - -0.17], p < 0.05; courage: β[95%CI] = -0.17 [-1.7 - -0.32], p < 0.01; patience: β[95%CI] = -0.19 [-1.33 - -0.36], p < 0.01). Extroversion is positively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = 0.19 [0.69-2.08], p < 0.001), and its two dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = 0.19 [0.32-1.05], p < 0.001; courage: β[95%CI] = 0.27 [0.5-1.23], p < 0.001). Neuroticism is negatively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = -0.13[-1.37 - -0.19], p < 0.01) and its one dimension (courage: β[95%CI] = -0.25 [-0.98 - -0.35], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION(S): The research has found that the humanistic care ability of mental health workers is at a low level, and the psychological capital and personality traits are significant factors influencing the humanistic care ability and its sub-dimensions. Interventions to improve the psychological capital of mental health workers or to promote the change of personality traits they want are recommended, thereby to promote humanistic practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jun;93(2):367-386 [PMID: 30720230]
  2. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2016 Jun;41(4):222-4 [PMID: 27332767]
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2320-2330 [PMID: 28623052]
  4. J Prof Nurs. 2018 Jul - Aug;34(4):314-319 [PMID: 30055686]
  5. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):19 [PMID: 33419411]
  6. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):196-207 [PMID: 32141649]
  7. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):20-32 [PMID: 29243348]
  8. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jul;32(3):363-371 [PMID: 28639255]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22): [PMID: 33233513]
  10. West J Nurs Res. 2017 Feb;39(2):290-304 [PMID: 27378729]
  11. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 12;21(1):250 [PMID: 33980215]
  12. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jul 06;8(3): [PMID: 32640647]
  13. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987 Nov;2(1):61-9 [PMID: 3312256]
  14. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Mar;36:121-124 [PMID: 30921620]
  15. J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1465-1472 [PMID: 30358000]
  16. BJPsych Open. 2017 Feb 9;3(1):26-33 [PMID: 28243463]
  17. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2002 Oct;8(10):505-8 [PMID: 12419990]
  18. Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Feb;56:102547 [PMID: 33465749]
  19. World J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 22;4(3):62-8 [PMID: 25250223]
  20. Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Oct;7(5):318-324 [PMID: 30298438]
  21. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Aug;25(4):355-66 [PMID: 27170345]
  22. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 27;9(6): [PMID: 34071970]
  23. J Nurs Manag. 2021 May;29(4):822-833 [PMID: 33617096]
  24. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Dec;35(4):1226-1239 [PMID: 33615516]
  25. Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):1027-1032 [PMID: 30844930]
  26. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Mar;86:104315 [PMID: 31896034]
  27. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228-229 [PMID: 32032543]
  28. EPMA J. 2018 Oct 25;9(4):355-365 [PMID: 30538787]
  29. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1092-1099 [PMID: 29740787]
  30. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Aug;27(4):411-5 [PMID: 22024041]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Cross-Sectional Studies
Mental Health
Pandemics
Health Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0humanisticcarep < 0-0ability001healthworkersβ[95%CI] = 0[0β[95%CI]=-mentalfactorscapitalassociateddimensionsCOVID-19levelamonginfluencingPsychologicalcognition:[-1courage:0119affectstherapeuticMentalexploreS:onlinecross-sectionalPersonalitylowpositivelytwopatience:negativelypsychologicalpersonalitytraitspromoteBACKGROUND:psychiatricservicessignificantlyqualityrelationshipthusoutcomespatientsmayconfrontedobstaclespandemicwheretheauthorsaimedcapacitypotentialMETHODsurveyconducted262workingChongqingChinaDecember2020January2021DatacollectedCaringAbilityInventoryCAICapitalQuestionnairePCQ-24EysenckQuestionnaire-RevisedShortScaleChineseEPQ-RSCMultiplelinearregressionanalysisusedRESULTS:workers'score18647 ± 21344146-077]5130-047]4817-028]Psychoticism28[-518-251]three125717]0517732]3336]Extroversion69-208]32-105]275-123]Neuroticism13[-13719]onedimension25[-09835]CONCLUSIONresearchfoundsignificantsub-dimensionsInterventionsimprovechangewantrecommendedtherebypracticeInfluencingpandemic:studyCognitionCourageHealthcare

Similar Articles

Cited By