Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists.

Thilini Sudeshika, Louise S Deeks, Mark Naunton, Gregory M Peterson, Sam Kosari
Author Information
  1. Thilini Sudeshika: Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia. thilini.salpahewage@canberra.edu.au. ORCID
  2. Louise S Deeks: Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  3. Mark Naunton: Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  4. Gregory M Peterson: Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  5. Sam Kosari: Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists have been included in general practice teams to provide non-dispensing services in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) since 2016. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness are key considerations in providing high-quality patient care. These concepts have not been well studied following the inclusion of a pharmacist in general practice teams.
METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted to explore collaboration between pharmacists and health professionals in eight general practices in the ACT, where pharmacists were included in their teams. A validated survey instrument was adapted and utilised to assess the changes in interprofessional collaboration over time following the addition of a pharmacist. Another validated survey was utilised to explore team effectiveness at the end of the study. Semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis, were conducted with a purposeful sample of general practice staff members to understand the factors influencing the development of interprofessional collaboration.
RESULTS: In total, 56 and 41 participants completed the baseline and follow-up survey, including 26 who completed both surveys to assess the change in collaboration over time. Interprofessional collaboration scores were high initially and did not change over time. Team effectiveness was also high at the end of the study. Twenty-one individuals participated in interviews, which generated four main interrelated themes related to interprofessional collaboration: professional working relationships, trust, commitment to collaboration, and barriers to collaboration. Trust was integral to professional working relationships and commitment to collaboration. The barriers to collaboration included not having a role description for pharmacists, inadequate interest to initiate working relationships, lack of dedicated time for interaction, lack of utilisation, and poor awareness of pharmacist-led activities in general practice.
CONCLUSION: Interprofessional collaboration was initially high and not influenced by the addition of a pharmacist, perhaps reflecting the inherent nature of the general practices willing to include a pharmacist within their team. Introducing a clear job description for pharmacists, and dedicating time to interact with pharmacists, could be beneficial in improving trust and professional working relationships and enhancing collaboration between the pharmacists and other general practice team members.

Keywords

References

  1. Syst Rev. 2022 May 11;11(1):88 [PMID: 35546411]
  2. Value Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;8(1):59-66 [PMID: 15841895]
  3. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450 [PMID: 29792459]
  4. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Dec;6(4):324-33 [PMID: 21111389]
  5. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Jun 10;10:227-234 [PMID: 28652761]
  6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):121-124 [PMID: 36216498]
  7. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0258674 [PMID: 34648595]
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):602 [PMID: 34174873]
  9. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Dec;6(4):307-23 [PMID: 21111388]
  10. Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Jan;10(1):66-72 [PMID: 29276540]
  11. Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e189-e212 [PMID: 30569475]
  12. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;41(3):728-733 [PMID: 30937695]
  13. Int J Integr Care. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):10 [PMID: 32256254]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;18(3): [PMID: 33499259]
  15. Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):897-921 [PMID: 25423886]
  16. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Dec 07;8(4): [PMID: 33297509]
  17. Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 22;21(2):32 [PMID: 34220396]
  18. J Interprof Care. 2012 Jul;26(4):297-304 [PMID: 22563657]
  19. Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e155-e163 [PMID: 32041767]
  20. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Apr;15(4):338-345 [PMID: 29907317]
  21. J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):332-342 [PMID: 31329469]
  22. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2004 May-Jun;44(3):358-65 [PMID: 15191246]
  23. Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):544-551 [PMID: 30629165]
  24. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035087 [PMID: 32595137]
  25. Fam Pract. 2022 Oct 15;: [PMID: 36242543]
  26. J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39 Suppl 1:196-7 [PMID: 21174039]
  27. J Interprof Care. 2022 May-Jun;36(3):331-339 [PMID: 34126853]
  28. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 Jul;149(4):236-45 [PMID: 27540406]
  29. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):43-51 [PMID: 30899908]
  30. BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 14;23(1):6 [PMID: 35172734]

Grants

  1. 25097479/Capital Health Network: ACT's Primary Health Network

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0collaborationgeneralpracticepharmacistsInterprofessionalpharmacisttimeworkingrelationshipsteamsteameffectivenessincludedfollowingstudysurveyinterprofessionalhighprofessionalnon-dispensingACTinclusionconductedexplorepracticesvalidatedutilisedassessadditionendinterviewsmemberscompletedchangeinitiallyTeamtrustcommitmentbarriersTrustdescriptionlackwithinBACKGROUND:PharmacistsprovideservicesAustralianCapitalTerritorysince2016keyconsiderationsprovidinghigh-qualitypatientcareconceptswellstudiedMETHODS:mixedmethodshealthprofessionalseightinstrumentadaptedchangesAnotherSemi-structuredthematicanalysispurposefulsamplestaffunderstandfactorsinfluencingdevelopmentRESULTS:total5641participantsbaselinefollow-upincluding26surveysscoresalsoTwenty-oneindividualsparticipatedgeneratedfourmaininterrelatedthemesrelatedcollaboration:integralroleinadequateinterestinitiatededicatedinteractionutilisationpoorawarenesspharmacist-ledactivitiesCONCLUSION:influencedperhapsreflectinginherentnaturewillingincludeIntroducingclearjobdedicatinginteractbeneficialimprovingenhancingBarriersGeneralProfessional

Similar Articles

Cited By