Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.

Sujata M Bhavnani, Jeffrey P Hammel, Elizabeth A Lakota, Michael Trang, Justin C Bader, Catharine C Bulik, Brian D VanScoy, Christopher M Rubino, Michael D Huband, Lawrence Friedrich, Judith N Steenbergen, Paul G Ambrose
Author Information
  1. Sujata M Bhavnani: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA. ORCID
  2. Jeffrey P Hammel: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA.
  3. Elizabeth A Lakota: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA.
  4. Michael Trang: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA. ORCID
  5. Justin C Bader: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA.
  6. Catharine C Bulik: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA.
  7. Brian D VanScoy: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA. ORCID
  8. Christopher M Rubino: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA. ORCID
  9. Michael D Huband: JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA. ORCID
  10. Lawrence Friedrich: Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  11. Judith N Steenbergen: Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  12. Paul G Ambrose: Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, New York, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment on days 1 and 2 by MIC were assessed using the following four approaches for selecting PK-PD targets: (i) median, (ii) second highest, (iii) highest, and (iv) randomly assigned total-drug ELF and free-drug plasma ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with a 1-log CFU reduction from baseline. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on total-drug ELF AUC/MIC ratio targets on days 1 and 2 were ≥91.1% for S. pneumoniae for all approaches but the highest target and ≥99.2% for H. influenzae for all approaches at MICs (0.12 and 1 μg/mL for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively). Lower percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on free-drug plasma AUC/MIC ratio targets were observed for randomly assigned and the highest free-drug plasma targets for S. pneumoniae and for all targets for H. influenzae. These data provided support for approved omadacycline dosing regimens to treat patients with CABP and decisions for the interpretive criteria for the susceptibility testing of omadacycline against these pathogens.

Keywords

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):415-27 [PMID: 26172429]
  2. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;36:114-123 [PMID: 29096171]
  3. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Dec;27:337-351 [PMID: 34775129]
  4. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Nov;66(5):1-76 [PMID: 29235984]
  5. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):1080-1090 [PMID: 31474458]
  6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4): [PMID: 29378719]
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jun 27;61(7): [PMID: 28416552]
  8. Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71 [PMID: 25530442]
  9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9): [PMID: 28696233]
  10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Apr 24;61(5): [PMID: 28193651]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5): [PMID: 32071045]
  12. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Dec 16;17(12): [PMID: 27999274]
  13. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;36:1-7 [PMID: 28688237]
  14. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;97(3):115054 [PMID: 32376058]
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51 Suppl 1:S103-10 [PMID: 20597657]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6): [PMID: 32284378]
  17. Thorax. 2012 Jan;67(1):71-9 [PMID: 20729232]
  18. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Apr;44(4):943-9 [PMID: 10722495]
  19. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;36:107-113 [PMID: 29128853]
  20. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):528-538 [PMID: 30726689]
  21. Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):130-41 [PMID: 20203464]
  22. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1): [PMID: 27821446]
  23. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):517-527 [PMID: 30726692]
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1;62(7):817-823 [PMID: 26747825]
  25. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7): [PMID: 32340986]
  26. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5): [PMID: 30858208]

MeSH Term

Humans
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteria
Haemophilus influenzae
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Pneumonia, Bacterial
Streptococcus pneumoniae

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
omadacycline

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pneumoniaeinfluenzaePK-PDtargetsomadacyclinetargetSHattainmentfree-drugplasmahighestratioStreptococcusHaemophiluspatientsCABPtotal-drugELFivq24h12daysprobabilitiesapproachesAUC/MICOmadacyclineapprovedtreatcommunity-acquiredbacterialpneumoniadatausing100 mgeverydayPercentMICrandomlyassignedbasednovelaminomethylcyclineactivityGram-positive-negativeorganismsincludingUnitedStatesUsingnonclinicalpharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamicefficacysurveillancepopulationpharmacokineticmodelanalysesundertakenepithelialliningfluidexposuresevaluateintravenously12 h200 mg24 hfollowed300 mgorally35assessedfollowingfourselectingtargets:medianiisecondiiiivareaconcentration-timecurveassociated1-logCFUreductionbaselinewere ≥911%and ≥992%MICs0121 μg/mLrespectivelyLowerpercentobservedprovidedsupportdosingregimensdecisionsinterpretivecriteriasusceptibilitytestingpathogensPharmacokinetic-PharmacodynamicTargetAttainmentAnalysesEvaluatingDosingRegimensTreatmentPatientsCommunity-AcquiredBacterialPneumoniaArisingpharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamicssimulations

Similar Articles

Cited By