BMI, socioeconomic status, and bone mineral density in U.S. adults: Mediation analysis in the NHANES.

Yun Zhang, Caixia Tan, Wenfu Tan
Author Information
  1. Yun Zhang: Department of Traumatic and Pediatric Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
  2. Caixia Tan: Department of Traumatic and Pediatric Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
  3. Wenfu Tan: Department of Traumatic and Pediatric Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China.

Abstract

Introduction: The mechanism by which socioeconomic status (SES) affects bone mineral density (BMD) remains unknown, and body mass index (BMI) may be a potential mediator. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether BMI mediates the relationship between SES [education level and poverty income ratio (PIR)] and lumbar BMD and the proportion it mediates.
Methods: This study included a total of 11,075 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Lumbar BMD was measured at the lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Multivariate linear regression and smoothing curve fitting were used to investigate the relationship between SES and lumbar BMD. Mediator analysis was used to investigate the proportion of BMI mediating the association between SES and BMD.
Results: In the fully adjusted model, there was a positive correlation between SES and BMD (education level: β = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.005, 0.045; PIR: β = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.011). Mediation analysis showed that BMI mediated the relationship between PIR, education level, and lumbar BMD with a range of mediation proportions from 13.33 to 18.20%.
Conclusion: BMI partially mediated the positive association between SES and BMD, and this association may be largely mediated by factors other than BMI.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Gen Med. 2022 Feb 28;15:2261-2270 [PMID: 35250302]
  2. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Jun;11(6):857-63 [PMID: 8725184]
  3. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 27;23(15): [PMID: 35955431]
  4. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Sep;56(3):579-86 [PMID: 1503072]
  5. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Feb;22(2):517-27 [PMID: 20449573]
  6. Am J Public Health. 1976 Mar;66(3):262-7 [PMID: 1259062]
  7. Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 15;13:925690 [PMID: 36189280]
  8. Nutr J. 2020 Jun 20;19(1):57 [PMID: 32563257]
  9. Epidemiology. 1991 Jan;2(1):16-25 [PMID: 2021661]
  10. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 16;11(24): [PMID: 36556093]
  11. JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1600-1612 [PMID: 29677308]
  12. Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 08;13:975400 [PMID: 36159805]
  13. Osteoporos Int. 2021 Apr;32(4):633-643 [PMID: 32740669]
  14. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Nov;33(11):2347-2355 [PMID: 35833955]
  15. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(9):865-74 [PMID: 3597688]
  16. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):898-907 [PMID: 28689769]
  17. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Jun;41(2):161-5 [PMID: 3655637]
  18. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jun;36(6):e24473 [PMID: 35524426]
  19. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan;17(1):91-8 [PMID: 15883659]
  20. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Apr;62(3):1441-1451 [PMID: 36637493]
  21. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 05;13:922903 [PMID: 35865310]
  22. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Sep;20(9):1487-97 [PMID: 19107382]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2009 Mar 25;9:88 [PMID: 19320986]
  24. Nutr J. 2023 Jan 12;22(1):5 [PMID: 36631866]
  25. Public Health. 2005 Jul;119(7):616-25 [PMID: 15925677]
  26. Environ Pollut. 2023 Jan 15;317:120783 [PMID: 36460186]
  27. J Nutr. 2023 Mar;153(3):909 [PMID: 36774231]
  28. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 14;13:857110 [PMID: 35360054]
  29. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):170 [PMID: 35787696]
  30. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(12):1043-50 [PMID: 11256896]
  31. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S3-7 [PMID: 15365697]
  32. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1761-7 [PMID: 12049882]
  33. J Nutr. 2011 Sep;141(9):1738-45 [PMID: 21795427]
  34. Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):364-376 [PMID: 30696576]
  35. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274434 [PMID: 36094921]
  36. Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1699-1709 [PMID: 28236128]
  37. J Bone Metab. 2015 Aug;22(3):119-26 [PMID: 26389087]
  38. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022 Dec 12;: [PMID: 36508128]
  39. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2023 Jan;188:102530 [PMID: 36586398]
  40. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):150 [PMID: 36690969]
  41. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Jan 19;: [PMID: 36656440]
  42. Orthopedics. 2023 Jan 10;:1-5 [PMID: 36623278]
  43. J Bone Miner Res. 1993 May;8(5):567-73 [PMID: 8511983]
  44. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 23;332(12):767-73 [PMID: 7862179]
  45. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Aug;5(4):787-797 [PMID: 28849408]
  46. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 14;101(41):e31164 [PMID: 36253982]
  47. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010 Nov 1;503(1):20-7 [PMID: 20599663]
  48. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Dec 4;13(1):135 [PMID: 30515581]
  49. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e31984 [PMID: 36626464]
  50. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 15;17(1):92 [PMID: 35168655]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BMDBMISES0lumbarsocioeconomicstatusbonemineraldensityinvestigaterelationshipNHANESanalysisassociationmediatedbodymassindexmaystudymediateslevelPIRproportionusedpositiveeducationβ=95%CI:MediationmediationIntroduction:mechanismaffectsremainsunknownpotentialmediatorpurposewhether[educationpovertyincomeratio]Methods:includedtotal11075adultsNationalHealthNutritionExaminationSurveyLumbarmeasuredspinedual-energyX-rayabsorptiometryDXAMultivariatelinearregressionsmoothingcurvefittingMediatormediatingResults:fullyadjustedmodelcorrelationlevel:025005045PIR:007002011showedrangeproportions13331820%Conclusion:partiallylargelyfactorsUSadults:effect

Similar Articles

Cited By