Population-Based Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Whole-Genome Sequencing and Contact Tracing During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Switzerland.

Nanina Anderegg, Tiana Schwab, Loïc Borcard, Catrina Mugglin, Bettina Keune-Dübi, Alban Ramette, Lukas Fenner
Author Information
  1. Nanina Anderegg: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  2. Tiana Schwab: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  3. Loïc Borcard: Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  4. Catrina Mugglin: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  5. Bettina Keune-Dübi: Cantonal Physician's Office, Gesundheitsamt, Canton of Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
  6. Alban Ramette: Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  7. Lukas Fenner: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testing and contact tracing (CT) can interrupt transmission chains of SARS-CoV-2. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can potentially strengthen these investigations and provide insights on transmission.
METHODS: We included all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases diagnosed between 4 June and 26 July 2021, in a Swiss canton. We defined CT clusters based on epidemiological links reported in the CT data and genomic clusters as sequences with no single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences between any 2 pairs of sequences being compared. We assessed the agreement between CT clusters and genomic clusters.
RESULTS: Of 359 COVID-19 cases, 213 were sequenced. Overall, agreement between CT and genomic clusters was low (Cohen's κ = 0.13). Of 24 CT clusters with ≥2 sequenced samples, 9 (37.5%) were also linked based on genomic sequencing but in 4 of these, WGS found additional cases in other CT clusters. Household was most often reported source of infection (n = 101 [28.1%]) and home addresses coincided well with CT clusters: In 44 of 54 CT clusters containing ≥2 cases (81.5%), all cases in the cluster had the same reported home address. However, only a quarter of household transmission was confirmed by WGS (6 of 26 genomic clusters [23.1%]). A sensitivity analysis using ≤1-SNP differences to define genomic clusters resulted in similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: WGS data supplemented epidemiological CT data, supported the detection of potential additional clusters missed by CT, and identified misclassified transmissions and sources of infection. Household transmission was overestimated by CT.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Microbe. 2020 Jul;1(3):e99-e100 [PMID: 32835336]
  2. Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 1;11(1):4376 [PMID: 32873808]
  3. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):861-866 [PMID: 32576605]
  4. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;27(9):2361-2368 [PMID: 34424164]
  5. Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491): [PMID: 32234805]
  6. Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528 [PMID: 30016406]
  7. BMC Med. 2017 Jun 13;15(1):105 [PMID: 28606177]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33): [PMID: 34385318]
  9. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122240 [PMID: 34448865]
  10. Lancet. 2004 Jan 17;363(9404):212-4 [PMID: 14738796]
  11. Euro Surveill. 2017 Mar 30;22(13): [PMID: 28382917]
  12. BMJ. 2020 Apr 27;369:m1557 [PMID: 32341002]
  13. Cell Rep Med. 2022 Mar 11;3(4):100583 [PMID: 35480627]
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 23;74(6):1039-1046 [PMID: 34181711]
  15. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Dec;27:267-272 [PMID: 34718203]
  16. Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 25;9(4): [PMID: 33806013]
  17. Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1398-1404 [PMID: 32647358]
  18. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 11;11(1):6351 [PMID: 33311501]
  19. Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 15;185(12):1327-1339 [PMID: 28982226]
  20. Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 13;12(1):5412 [PMID: 34518525]
  21. J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 5;225(1):10-18 [PMID: 34555152]
  22. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Dec;17:100281 [PMID: 34611629]
  23. Viruses. 2021 Apr 01;13(4): [PMID: 33916205]
  24. Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):1012 [PMID: 35197443]
  25. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1263-1272 [PMID: 32679081]
  26. Euro Surveill. 2022 Oct;27(43): [PMID: 36305336]
  27. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160 [PMID: 32559451]
  28. Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529): [PMID: 33303686]
  29. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 31;9(4): [PMID: 32244365]
  30. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Oct 24;: [PMID: 34756867]
  31. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;43(10):1485-1487 [PMID: 33941299]

Grants

  1. U01 AI069924/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Switzerland
Pandemics
Contact Tracing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CTclustersgenomictransmissioncasesWGSsequencingCOVID-19reporteddatacontacttracingcan426basedepidemiologicalsequencesdifferences2agreementsequenced=≥25%additionalHouseholdinfection1%]homeclusterhouseholdCoronavirusBACKGROUND:TestinginterruptchainsSARS-CoV-2Whole-genomepotentiallystrengtheninvestigationsprovideinsightsMETHODS:includedlaboratory-confirmeddiagnosedJuneJuly2021Swisscantondefinedlinkssingle-nucleotidepolymorphismSNPpairscomparedassessedRESULTS:359213OveralllowCohen'sκ01324samples937alsolinkedfoundoftensourcen101[28addressescoincidedwellclusters:4454containing81addressHoweverquarterconfirmed6[23sensitivityanalysisusing≤1-SNPdefineresultedsimilarresultsCONCLUSIONS:supplementedsupporteddetectionpotentialmissedidentifiedmisclassifiedtransmissionssourcesoverestimatedPopulation-BasedSevereAcuteRespiratorySyndromeWhole-GenomeSequencingContactTracingDisease2019PandemicSwitzerlandmolecularwholegenome

Similar Articles

Cited By