Regulation of Digital Healthcare in India: Ethical and Legal Challenges.

Dipika Jain
Author Information
  1. Dipika Jain: Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat 131001, India.

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, digital healthcare has gained an influx of interest and global investment. The WHO has published guidelines and recommendations for countries to successfully implement telemedicine on a large, nationwide scale. This is not only helpful for patients who wish to protect themselves from COVID-19 and related illnesses that they may be vulnerable to, but it also has great potential to increase access to healthcare. In India, a country without universal healthcare grappling with a high level of distrust in the public health system, there are several implementation challenges for digital healthcare across the country. The current laws in India that regulate technology do not explicitly address telehealth, nor are there adequate data protection laws in place that could manage the significant amount of data that would be generated by digital healthcare if applied on a large scale. Further, there are concerns at the level of patient privacy, which could be compromised through digital healthcare. In addition to the legal concerns surrounding privacy, there is no framework in place to ensure informed consent in a digital healthcare context. In this paper, I analyze the legal, structural, and ethical concerns around digital health and provide an understanding of the problems these shortcomings pose, as well as policy recommendations for overcoming these problems.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):456 [PMID: 31035969]
  2. Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):220-2 [PMID: 24152343]
  3. Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Oct-Dec;6(4):216-8 [PMID: 19839552]
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e21747 [PMID: 33764885]
  5. Health Hum Rights. 2000;4(2):38-66 [PMID: 10796970]
  6. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1107-1111 [PMID: 34242822]
  7. Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):5-19 [PMID: 35747286]
  8. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):2107090 [PMID: 36017949]
  9. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 14;291(6510):1700-1 [PMID: 3935249]
  10. Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(Supplement_3):18-22 [PMID: 31738439]
  11. Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(1):65-80 [PMID: 20845830]
  12. J Bus Ethics. 2022;180(2):581-604 [PMID: 34257470]
  13. Eur J Health Law. 2016 Jun;23(3):248-64 [PMID: 27491248]
  14. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Jul 12;2:56 [PMID: 15248892]

Grants

  1. N/A/United Nations Development Programme

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0digitalhealthcarehealthconcernsprivacyCOVID-19recommendationslargescaleIndiacountrylevellawsdataplacelegalinformedconsentproblemswakepandemicgainedinfluxinterestglobalinvestmentWHOpublishedguidelinescountriessuccessfullyimplementtelemedicinenationwidehelpfulpatientswishprotectrelatedillnessesmayvulnerablealsogreatpotentialincreaseaccesswithoutuniversalgrapplinghighdistrustpublicsystemseveralimplementationchallengesacrosscurrentregulatetechnologyexplicitlyaddresstelehealthadequateprotectionmanagesignificantamountgeneratedappliedpatientcompromisedadditionsurroundingframeworkensurecontextpaperanalyzestructuralethicalaroundprovideunderstandingshortcomingsposewellpolicyovercomingRegulationDigitalHealthcareIndia:EthicalLegalChallengeslawregulation

Similar Articles

Cited By