Can Stringent Government Initiatives Lead to Global Economic Recovery Rapidly during the COVID-19 Epidemic?

Lizheng Ma, Congzhi Zhang, Kai Lisa Lo, Xiangyan Meng
Author Information
  1. Lizheng Ma: School of Marxism, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.
  2. Congzhi Zhang: School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Road, Shanghai 201306, China.
  3. Kai Lisa Lo: School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Road, Shanghai 201306, China. ORCID
  4. Xiangyan Meng: School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Road, Shanghai 201306, China. ORCID

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of government measures implemented against COVID-19 and the factors influencing a country's economic growth from a global perspective. With the help of the data of the Government Response Stringency Index (GRSI), Google mobility, and confirmed COVID-19 daily cases, we conducted a panel model for 105 countries and regions from 11 March 2020 to 31 June 2021 to explore the effects of response policies in different countries against the pandemic. First, the results showed that staying in residential places had the strongest correlation with confirmed cases. Second, in countries with higher government stringency, stay-at-home policies carried out in the early spread of the pandemic had the most effective the impact. In addition, the results have also been strictly robustly analyzed by applying the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Third, after reconstructing a panel data of 47 OECD countries, we further concluded that governments should take stricter restrictive measures in response to COVID-19. Even though it may also cause a shock to the market in the short term, this may not be sustainable. As long as the policy response is justified, it will moderate the negative effect on the economy over time, and finally have a positive effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Transl Res. 2008 Jun;151(6):275-87 [PMID: 18514138]
  2. Postgrad Med J. 2021 Feb;97(1144):130-132 [PMID: 32561598]
  3. Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):817-823 [PMID: 32500243]
  4. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022 Jan;76:103450 [PMID: 34745847]
  5. J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):e70-e71 [PMID: 32579981]
  6. China Econ Rev. 2021 Aug;68:101629 [PMID: 36570716]
  7. Innovation (Camb). 2020 Aug 28;1(2):100025 [PMID: 33521760]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 18;17(8): [PMID: 32325710]
  9. Energy Econ. 2021 Sep;101:105431 [PMID: 34876761]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148789 [PMID: 34243010]
  11. Cities. 2022 Nov;130:103907 [PMID: 35966443]
  12. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1090 [PMID: 33597546]
  13. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538 [PMID: 33686204]
  14. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Nov;37:101783 [PMID: 33013239]
  15. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371 [PMID: 32835011]
  16. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 22;13(1):3065 [PMID: 36813824]
  17. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 3;11(1):6189 [PMID: 33273462]
  18. Clim Risk Manag. 2021;34:100363 [PMID: 34518797]
  19. Patterns (N Y). 2021 Aug 13;2(8):100315 [PMID: 34337569]
  20. Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2021 Dec;59:98-107 [PMID: 35317309]
  21. BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2743 [PMID: 32669358]
  22. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102801 [PMID: 36276301]
  23. Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1513-1536 [PMID: 35279232]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22): [PMID: 36429679]
  25. J Transp Geogr. 2020 Jun;86:102749 [PMID: 32834670]
  26. J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2): [PMID: 32052841]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Pandemics
Drive
Economic Development
Government

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19countriesresponsegovernmentmeasureseconomicdataGovernmentconfirmedcasespanelpoliciespandemicresultsstringencyalsomayeffectpaperinvestigateseffectivenessimplementedfactorsinfluencingcountry'sgrowthglobalperspectivehelpResponseStringencyIndexGRSIGooglemobilitydailyconductedmodel105regions11March202031June2021exploreeffectsdifferentFirstshowedstayingresidentialplacesstrongestcorrelationSecondhigherstay-at-homecarriedearlyspreadeffectiveimpactadditionstrictlyrobustlyanalyzedapplyingpropensityscorematchingPSMmethodThirdreconstructing47OECDconcludedgovernmentstakestricterrestrictiveEventhoughcauseshockmarketshorttermsustainablelongpolicyjustifiedwillmoderatenegativeeconomytimefinallypositiveCanStringentInitiativesLeadGlobalEconomicRecoveryRapidlyEpidemic?COVID-19recoveryindex

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.