Dual mediating effects of social support and fertility stress on mindfulness and fertility quality of life in infertile men: A case-control study.

Maierhaba Abulizi, Hua Xu, Alapate Abuduguli, Wanzhu Zhao, Lijuan He, Chen Zhang
Author Information
  1. Maierhaba Abulizi: School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
  2. Hua Xu: The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Reproductive and Fertility Centre, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
  3. Alapate Abuduguli: School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
  4. Wanzhu Zhao: School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
  5. Lijuan He: School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
  6. Chen Zhang: School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

Abstract

Background: Infertility is one of the three major public health problems in the world, bringing immense physical and psychological damage to men and affecting the quality of men's fertility life. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the status of social support, fertility stress, mindfulness, and fertility quality of life in infertile men, and to explore the dual mediating effects of social support and fertility stress on mindfulness and fertility quality.
Methods: A case-control group study was conducted, with 246 men in the case group and 149 in the control group. The Social Support Scale, Fertility Stress Scale, Mindfulness Scale, and Fertility Quality of Life Scale were used to establish a structural equation model using Mplus 8.3 to explore social support and fertility stress. Pathway relationships were drawn between mindfulness and fertility quality of life in infertile men.
Results: There were significant differences between infertile and healthy men in each dimension of the core module of fertility quality of life, in the total score of the treatment module, in the total score of social support, in subjective and objective support, and in the total score of fertility stress, social pressure, sexual pressure, marital relationship, and childless pressure ( < 0.05 in each case). Further, the fertility quality of life in infertile men was positively correlated with mindfulness and social support, and negatively correlated with fertility stress ( < 0.05); mindfulness could directly affect the core and treatment modules of fertility life quality, and indirectly affect the core of fertility life quality through social support (mediation effect accounted for 19.0%), while the treatment module (mediation effect accounted for 13.7%), and the core module indirectly affected fertility life quality through fertility stress (mediation effect accounted for 16.8%).
Conclusion: The fertility quality of life of infertile men is not optimistic. Mindfulness-related interventions and programs can improve their fertility quality of life.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sex Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):824-30 [PMID: 21176113]
  2. J Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;2020:3289521 [PMID: 33381176]
  3. Am J Mens Health. 2021 Mar-Apr;15(2):1557988320982167 [PMID: 33834914]
  4. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jul;16(3):329-341 [PMID: 30525294]
  5. Res Nurs Health. 2018 Apr;41(2):156-165 [PMID: 29399819]
  6. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Mar;43(1):35-41 [PMID: 32633181]
  7. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;35(6):485-489 [PMID: 30612477]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):1607 [PMID: 33097027]
  9. BMC Womens Health. 2013 Apr 09;13:17 [PMID: 23570255]
  10. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 12;15(1):139 [PMID: 28701163]
  11. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018 Sep;21(3):195-203 [PMID: 28521566]
  12. Andrology. 2020 Sep;8(5):1038-1050 [PMID: 32170803]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1635-42 [PMID: 25954036]
  14. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:96-104 [PMID: 26742022]
  15. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 24;16(1):73 [PMID: 29690877]
  16. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 May;50(3):275-288 [PMID: 33497688]
  17. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1137-45 [PMID: 26884350]
  18. Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):496-505 [PMID: 22101025]
  19. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):38 [PMID: 30770738]
  20. Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 16;35(1):88-92 [PMID: 28985293]
  21. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1775-1787 [PMID: 32112277]
  22. Sleep Breath. 2019 Sep;23(3):925-931 [PMID: 30810886]
  23. J Res Health Sci. 2014 Winter;14(1):57-63 [PMID: 24402852]
  24. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019 Nov;37(5):455-467 [PMID: 30724578]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 03;19(5): [PMID: 35270642]
  26. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 17;16(1):233 [PMID: 30558633]
  27. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):41-47 [PMID: 29946210]
  28. Asian J Androl. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):640; discussion 640 [PMID: 24713831]
  29. Psychol Health Med. 2022 Apr;27(4):823-837 [PMID: 33874804]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fertilityqualitylifesocialsupportstressmenmindfulnessinfertileScalecoremodulestudygrouptotalscoretreatmentpressuremediationeffectaccountedexploremediatingeffectscase-controlcaseFertility< 005correlatedaffectindirectlyBackground:Infertilityonethreemajorpublichealthproblemsworldbringingimmensephysicalpsychologicaldamageaffectingmen'sThuspurposeanalyzestatusdualMethods:conducted246149controlSocialSupportStressMindfulnessQualityLifeusedestablishstructuralequationmodelusingMplus83PathwayrelationshipsdrawnResults:significantdifferenceshealthydimensionsubjectiveobjectivesexualmaritalrelationshipchildlesspositivelynegativelydirectlymodules190%137%affected168%Conclusion:optimisticMindfulness-relatedinterventionsprogramscanimproveDualmen:infertility

Similar Articles

Cited By