Multi-variable approach to groundwater vulnerability elucidation: A risk-based multi-objective optimization model.

Masoumeh Zare, Mohammad Reza Nikoo, Banafsheh Nematollahi, Amir H Gandomi, Raziyeh Farmani
Author Information
  1. Masoumeh Zare: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: masoumezare86@gmail.com.
  2. Mohammad Reza Nikoo: Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. Electronic address: m.reza@squ.edu.om.
  3. Banafsheh Nematollahi: Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USA. Electronic address: bnema001@ucr.edu.
  4. Amir H Gandomi: Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia; University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, 1034, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: gandomi@uts.edu.au.
  5. Raziyeh Farmani: Centre for Water Systems, Department of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. Electronic address: R.Farmani@exeter.ac.uk.

Abstract

Groundwater vulnerability mapping is essential in environmental management since there is an increase in contamination caused by excessive population growth. However, to our knowledge, there is rare research dedicated to optimizing the groundwater vulnerability models, considering risk conditions, using a robust multi-objective optimization algorithm coupled with a multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM). This study filled this knowledge gap by developing an innovative hybrid risk-based multi-objective optimization model using three distinguished models. The first model generated two series of scenarios for rate modifications associated with two common contaminations, Nitrate and Sulfate, based on susceptibility index (SI) and DRASTICA models. The second model was a multi-objective optimization framework using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms- II and III (NSGA-II and NSGA-III), considering uncertainties in the input rates by the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) technique. Finally, the third model was a well-known MCDM model, the COmplex PRoportional ASsessment (COPRAS), which identified the best compromise solution among Pareto-optimal solutions for weights of the contaminations. Regarding the Sulfate's results, although the optimized DRASTICA model led to the same correlation as the initial model, 0.7, the optimized SI model increased the correlation to 0.8 compared to the initial model as 0.58. For the Nitrate, both the optimized SI and the optimized DRASTICA models raised the correlation to 0.6 and 0.7 compared to the initial model with a correlation value of 0.36, respectively. Hence, the best and the lowest correlation among the optimized models were between SI and Sulfate concentration and SI and Nitrate concentration, respectively.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Nitrates
Algorithms
Groundwater
Uncertainty

Chemicals

Nitrates

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0model0modelsSIoptimizedcorrelationvulnerabilitymulti-objectiveoptimizationusingMCDMNitrateDRASTICAinitialGroundwaterknowledgegroundwaterconsideringdecision-makingrisk-basedtwocontaminationsSulfateindexsortinggeneticIIIIINSGA-IINSGA-IIItechniqueCOPRASbestamong7comparedrespectivelyconcentrationmappingessentialenvironmentalmanagementsinceincreasecontaminationcausedexcessivepopulationgrowthHoweverrareresearchdedicatedoptimizingriskconditionsrobustalgorithmcoupledmulti-criteriastudyfilledgapdevelopinginnovativehybridthreedistinguishedfirstgeneratedseriesscenariosratemodificationsassociatedcommonbasedsusceptibilitysecondframeworknon-dominatedalgorithms-uncertaintiesinputratesconditionalvalue-at-riskCVaRFinallythirdwell-knownCOmplexPRoportionalASsessmentidentifiedcompromisesolutionPareto-optimalsolutionsweightsRegardingSulfate'sresultsalthoughledincreased858raised6value36HencelowestMulti-variableapproachelucidation:ComplexproportionalassessmentmapLanduse-basedMulti-criteriaNon-dominatedalgorithm-

Similar Articles

Cited By