Assessing Parameters of Reinforcement on Efficiency of Acquisition: A Systematic Review.

Sarah C Weinsztok, Kissel J Goldman, Iser G DeLeon
Author Information
  1. Sarah C Weinsztok: Cofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA. ORCID
  2. Kissel J Goldman: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD USA.
  3. Iser G DeLeon: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.

Abstract

Discrete-trial training (DTT) is a common method of instruction used in early intervention amongindividuals with autism spectrum disorder and related neurodevelopmental disorders and is an effective method of teaching different skills such as tacting, listener responding, and matching. Delivery of effective reinforcers is a key component of DTT. Although general recommendations have been made for effective reinforcement delivery in DTT, no review has synthesized the available research on the efficiency of various reinforcer parameters on efficiency of acquisition. The current systematic review assessed the efficiency of various reinforcer parameters on acquisition in DTT. Results were idiosyncratic, and a general paucity of repeated measures examining specific reinforcer parameters within and across studies was observed. In general, (1) maintaining high levels of treatment integrity, (2) delivery of tangible (i.e. leisure items) or edible reinforcers in comparison with contingent praise as a reinforcer, and (3) delivery of edible reinforcers in comparison with other topographies of reinforcement were the most successful reinforcer parameter manipulations and always resulted in more efficient skill acquisition. The results of this review provide clinicians with information regarding what reinforcer parameter manipulations may be more or less likely to support efficient acquisition. The present review also provides considerations and makes recommendations for future research.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):667-84 [PMID: 23322925]
  2. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Spring;16(2):651-6 [PMID: 10932429]
  3. Am J Ment Retard. 2007 Nov;112(6):418-38 [PMID: 17963434]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):327-34 [PMID: 19949520]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):339-43 [PMID: 17624075]
  6. Am J Ment Defic. 1980 May;84(6):616-26 [PMID: 7377234]
  7. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Summer;17(2):175-88 [PMID: 6735950]
  8. Behav Modif. 2002 Jan;26(1):49-68 [PMID: 11799654]
  9. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):685-9 [PMID: 18189100]
  10. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):176-81 [PMID: 26947579]
  11. Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):600-21 [PMID: 25896361]
  12. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):730-4 [PMID: 27228967]
  13. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;45(3):593-9 [PMID: 23060672]
  14. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):575-89 [PMID: 26235379]
  15. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):690-706 [PMID: 31347699]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 May;52(2):574-579 [PMID: 30468249]
  17. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Summer;44(2):327-40 [PMID: 21709788]
  18. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):640-50 [PMID: 24114226]
  19. Behav Modif. 2020 Sep;44(5):670-697 [PMID: 30961361]
  20. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Feb;55(1):3-9 [PMID: 3571656]
  21. Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):359-83 [PMID: 15766629]
  22. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Feb;34(2):739-44 [PMID: 23220050]
  23. Res Dev Disabil. 2004 Sep-Oct;25(5):413-29 [PMID: 15217671]
  24. Implement Sci. 2010 Jul 19;5:56 [PMID: 20642853]
  25. ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):1037-40 [PMID: 18959712]
  26. J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313 [PMID: 24782203]
  27. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):227-32 [PMID: 25376814]
  28. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):924-9 [PMID: 26281795]
  29. Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Apr 16;12(2):401-406 [PMID: 31976245]
  30. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  31. J Autism Dev Disord. 1998 Feb;28(1):15-23 [PMID: 9546298]
  32. Am J Ment Retard. 1993 Jan;97(4):359-72; discussion 373-91 [PMID: 8427693]
  33. Behav Modif. 2020 Jan;44(1):49-69 [PMID: 30111164]
  34. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):918-23 [PMID: 26174019]
  35. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jul;51(3):482-501 [PMID: 29675825]
  36. Behav Modif. 2021 Sep;45(5):695-714 [PMID: 31997647]
  37. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):335-344 [PMID: 29446093]
  38. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):411-5 [PMID: 26792114]
  39. Res Dev Disabil. 2000 Jul-Aug;21(4):297-309 [PMID: 10983784]
  40. J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):290-303 [PMID: 28101892]
  41. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Summer;46(2):379-94 [PMID: 24114154]
  42. Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):37-48 [PMID: 23730465]
  43. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):351-5 [PMID: 21119913]
  44. Behav Modif. 2012 Mar;36(2):218-34 [PMID: 22133991]
  45. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):170-5 [PMID: 26510978]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reinforcerDTTreviewacquisitioneffectivereinforcersgeneraldeliveryefficiencyparametersDiscrete-trialtrainingmethodrecommendationsreinforcementresearchvariousediblecomparisonparametermanipulationsefficientReinforcementReviewcommoninstructionusedearlyinterventionamongindividualsautismspectrumdisorderrelatedneurodevelopmentaldisordersteachingdifferentskillstactinglistenerrespondingmatchingDeliverykeycomponentAlthoughmadesynthesizedavailablecurrentsystematicassessedResultsidiosyncraticpaucityrepeatedmeasuresexaminingspecificwithinacrossstudiesobserved1maintaininghighlevelstreatmentintegrity2tangibleieleisureitemscontingentpraise3topographiessuccessfulalwaysresultedskillresultsprovidecliniciansinformationregardingmaylesslikelysupportpresentalsoprovidesconsiderationsmakesfutureAssessingParametersEfficiencyAcquisition:SystematicAcquisitionMaintenance

Similar Articles

Cited By