Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: a Narrative Review.

Hannah N Marmor, J Tyler Zorn, Stephen A Deppen, Pierre P Massion, Eric L Grogan
Author Information
  1. Hannah N Marmor: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  2. J Tyler Zorn: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  3. Stephen A Deppen: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  4. Pierre P Massion: Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  5. Eric L Grogan: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Abstract

Although when used as a lung cancer screening tool low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has demonstrated a significant reduction in lung cancer related mortality, it is not without pitfalls. The associated high false positive rate, inability to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules, cumulative radiation exposure, and resulting patient anxiety have all demonstrated the need for adjunctive testing in lung cancer screening. Current research focuses on developing liquid biomarkers to complement imaging as non-invasive lung cancer diagnostics. Biomarkers can be useful for both the early detection and diagnosis of disease, thereby decreasing the number of unnecessary radiologic tests performed. Biomarkers can stratify cancer risk to further enrich the screening population and augment existing risk prediction. Finally, biomarkers can be used to distinguish benign from malignant nodules in lung cancer screening. While many biomarkers require further validation studies, several, including autoantibodies and blood protein profiling, are available for clinical use. This paper describes the need for biomarkers as a lung cancer screening tool, both in terms of diagnosis and risk assessment. Additionally, this paper will discuss the goals of biomarker use, describe properties of a good biomarker, and review several of the most promising biomarkers currently being studied including autoantibodies, complement fragments, microRNA, blood proteins, circulating tumor DNA, and DNA methylation. Finally, we will describe future directions in the field of biomarker development.

Keywords

References

  1. Dis Markers. 2007;23(1-2):5-30 [PMID: 17325423]
  2. Biomark Insights. 2018 Jan 15;13:1177271917751608 [PMID: 29371783]
  3. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Apr;4(8):158 [PMID: 27195276]
  4. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30 [PMID: 31912902]
  5. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):1998-2005 [PMID: 27729459]
  6. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 20;8(1):6348 [PMID: 29679068]
  7. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7761):385-389 [PMID: 31142840]
  8. PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0125026 [PMID: 25965386]
  9. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jan;12(1):77-84 [PMID: 27544059]
  10. Cureus. 2019 Jun 16;11(6):e4907 [PMID: 31423385]
  11. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013 May;23(2):211-24 [PMID: 23566973]
  12. Lung Cancer. 2017 May;107:50-58 [PMID: 27344275]
  13. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Aug;78:31-41 [PMID: 31326635]
  14. Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7802):245-251 [PMID: 32269342]
  15. Oncol Lett. 2020 May;19(5):3389-3399 [PMID: 32269611]
  16. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Mar;14(3):343-357 [PMID: 30529598]
  17. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):578-584 [PMID: 27615397]
  18. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):45-50 [PMID: 18158403]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409 [PMID: 21714641]
  20. BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):181 [PMID: 29439651]
  21. Tumour Biol. 2012 Oct;33(5):1319-26 [PMID: 22492236]
  22. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;108(5):327-33 [PMID: 23893423]
  23. Theranostics. 2019 Apr 6;9(7):2056-2070 [PMID: 31037156]
  24. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 19;12(6): [PMID: 32575471]
  25. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Aug;5(8):992-1006 [PMID: 22689914]
  26. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):334-45 [PMID: 26896032]
  27. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Apr;10(4):629-37 [PMID: 25590604]
  28. Science. 2018 Feb 23;359(6378):926-930 [PMID: 29348365]
  29. Biomed Res Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;3(4): [PMID: 32913898]
  30. Lung. 2014 Oct;192(5):639-48 [PMID: 25108403]
  31. Ann Oncol. 2011 Feb;22(2):383-9 [PMID: 20675559]
  32. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 18;105(18):1385-93 [PMID: 23940286]
  33. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 15;193(4):427-37 [PMID: 26465739]
  34. J Transl Med. 2015 Feb 12;13:55 [PMID: 25880432]
  35. Clin Chest Med. 2020 Mar;41(1):1-24 [PMID: 32008623]
  36. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;23(22):7141-7152 [PMID: 28855354]
  37. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281 [PMID: 28152136]
  38. Lung Cancer. 2014 Jan;83(1):51-5 [PMID: 24268382]
  39. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):768-73 [PMID: 24419137]
  40. Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):491-500 [PMID: 29496499]
  41. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;37(5):670-680 [PMID: 27732989]
  42. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 May;6(5):955-62 [PMID: 21415775]
  43. Clin Chest Med. 2018 Mar;39(1):31-43 [PMID: 29433723]
  44. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31 [PMID: 24004119]
  45. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):e15-e29 [PMID: 28960111]
  46. Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 26;9(5):6346-6355 [PMID: 29464077]
  47. Open Biol. 2017 Sep;7(9): [PMID: 28878044]
  48. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;204(11):1306-1316 [PMID: 34464235]
  49. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 19;107(6):djv063 [PMID: 25794889]

Grants

  1. T32 CA106183/NCI NIH HHS
  2. U01 CA152662/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerlungscreeningbiomarkersBiomarkerscanriskbiomarkerusedtooldemonstrateddistinguishbenignmalignantnodulesneedcomplementdiagnosisFinallyseveralincludingautoantibodiesbloodusepaperwilldescribeDNALungCancerAlthoughlow-dosecomputedtomographyLDCTsignificantreductionrelatedmortalitywithoutpitfallsassociatedhighfalsepositiverateinabilitycumulativeradiationexposureresultingpatientanxietyadjunctivetestingCurrentresearchfocusesdevelopingliquidimagingnon-invasivediagnosticsusefulearlydetectiondiseasetherebydecreasingnumberunnecessaryradiologictestsperformedstratifyenrichpopulationaugmentexistingpredictionmanyrequirevalidationstudiesproteinprofilingavailableclinicaldescribestermsassessmentAdditionallydiscussgoalspropertiesgoodreviewpromisingcurrentlystudiedfragmentsmicroRNAproteinscirculatingtumormethylationfuturedirectionsfielddevelopmentScreening:NarrativeReviewDiagnosisEarlyDetectionScreening

Similar Articles

Cited By (15)