The Influence of Leisure Engagement on Daily Emotional Well-being.

Shang-Ti Chen, Jinshil Hyun, Alan R Graefe, Andrew J Mowen, David M Almeida, Martin J Sliwinski
Author Information
  1. Shang-Ti Chen: Department of Tourism, Recreation, and Leisure Studies, National Dong Hwa University.
  2. Jinshil Hyun: The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
  3. Alan R Graefe: Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, Penn State University.
  4. Andrew J Mowen: Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, Penn State University.
  5. David M Almeida: Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University.
  6. Martin J Sliwinski: Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University.

Abstract

Leisure engagement is believed to offer emotional benefits. However, relatively few studies have examined how leisure engagement influences emotional well-being in the context of individuals' everyday lives. The current study examined the associations between leisure engagement and daily emotional well-being, as measured by participants' mean levels of positive affect (PA), PA variability, and PA reactivity to stressors. Using smartphones, participants ( = 176) completed ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) 5 times per day for 14 consecutive days. The Pearson correlations indicated that the participants who engaged in leisure more frequently experienced higher mean levels of PA and lower PA variability in daily life compared to those with less frequent leisure engagement. However, multilevel models indicated that individuals' differences in frequency of leisure engagement did not influence their emotional reactivity in response to daily stressors. The findings extend the importance of leisure engagement to consider the dynamics of daily emotional well-being.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 03;15:146 [PMID: 26138700]
  2. J Psychosom Res. 2018 Jan;104:41-47 [PMID: 29275784]
  3. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21 [PMID: 649936]
  4. J Leis Res. 2014;46(1):106-124 [PMID: 25221350]
  5. Psychosom Med. 2016 Jun;78(5):573-82 [PMID: 26867082]
  6. Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 03;9:1349 [PMID: 30123158]
  7. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Feb;45(1):110-20 [PMID: 23080393]
  8. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Sep;83:91-100 [PMID: 28601752]
  9. Assessment. 2002 Mar;9(1):41-55 [PMID: 11911234]
  10. Psychol Bull. 2004 May;130(3):355-91 [PMID: 15122924]
  11. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 May;70(3):398-406 [PMID: 24170714]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):365-76 [PMID: 12585810]
  13. Psychophysiology. 2016 Jun;53(6):880-90 [PMID: 26899260]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):804-13 [PMID: 11374751]
  15. Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34(12):1154-65 [PMID: 26030309]
  16. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Mar 01;72(2):259-267 [PMID: 27162228]
  17. Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-26 [PMID: 11315248]
  18. J Leis Res. 2013;45(3):393-414 [PMID: 24659826]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):730-49 [PMID: 17014296]
  20. J Pers. 2005 Dec;73(6):1511-38 [PMID: 16274444]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):273-84 [PMID: 10707334]
  22. Psychol Aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):778-91 [PMID: 20025395]
  23. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Nov;47(5):1105-17 [PMID: 6520704]
  24. Emotion. 2013 Feb;13(1):1-6 [PMID: 23163709]
  25. Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):172-5 [PMID: 11934003]
  26. J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1161-90 [PMID: 15509280]
  27. Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):420-31 [PMID: 25938249]
  28. Psychosom Med. 2009 Sep;71(7):725-32 [PMID: 19592515]
  29. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):733-41 [PMID: 23531486]

Grants

  1. R01 AG039409/NIA NIH HHS
  2. R03 AG050798/NIA NIH HHS
  3. T32 AG049676/NIA NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leisureengagementemotionalPAdailywell-beingaffectvariabilityreactivityLeisurebenefitsHoweverexaminedindividuals'meanlevelspositivestressorsparticipantsecologicalmomentaryindicatedbelievedofferrelativelystudiesinfluencescontexteverydaylivescurrentstudyassociationsmeasuredparticipants'Usingsmartphones=176completedassessmentsEMAs5timesperday14consecutivedaysPearsoncorrelationsengagedfrequentlyexperiencedhigherlowerlifecomparedlessfrequentmultilevelmodelsdifferencesfrequencyinfluenceresponsefindingsextendimportanceconsiderdynamicsInfluenceEngagementDailyEmotionalWell-beingassessment

Similar Articles

Cited By