Supervisors' ethical leadership and graduate students' attitudes toward academic misconduct.

Guangxi Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Sunfan Mao, Qiang Xu, Xiaoqin Ma
Author Information
  1. Guangxi Zhang: Department of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China. ORCID
  2. Tingting Zhang: School of Business, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China. ORCID
  3. Sunfan Mao: Department of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Qiang Xu: Department of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
  5. Xiaoqin Ma: Department of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Graduate students' academic misconduct has received increasing attention. Although past literature has emphasized university faculty as an important influencing factor on students' moral behaviors, the mechanisms must be further disclosed. We investigated how supervisors' ethical leadership influenced graduate students' attitudes toward academic misconduct. We explained why and how supervisor gender affects post-graduate students' social learning process by integrating social cognitive theory and role congruity theory. Study 1 used a sample of 301 graduate students in 60 academic teams in four Chinese business schools. Study 2 used experimental vignette methodology to enhance the findings' internal and external validity and provided evidence of causality. Based on the two complementary studies, we found that supervisors' ethical leadership significantly inhibited students' acceptance of academic misconduct through students' moral efficacy and the ethical climate of the academic team. The indirect effect via moral efficacy was more significant s for female supervisors. Implications for ethical leadership, academic misconduct, gender differences in leadership, and moral education were discussed.

References

  1. Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):372-393 [PMID: 33048578]
  2. Science. 1993 Jan 29;259(5095):584-5, 647-8 [PMID: 8430300]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;21(3):203-227 [PMID: 27225037]
  4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83 [PMID: 17188552]
  5. Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):573-98 [PMID: 12088246]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  7. J Appl Psychol. 2020 Dec;105(12):1447-1465 [PMID: 32162952]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):146-163 [PMID: 30299115]
  9. J Bus Ethics. 2023;183(2):619-636 [PMID: 35125566]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Leadership
Students
Attitude
Morals
Faculty

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0students'academicmisconductethicalleadershipmoralgraduatesupervisors'attitudestowardgendersocialtheoryStudyusedefficacyGraduatereceivedincreasingattentionAlthoughpastliteratureemphasizeduniversityfacultyimportantinfluencingfactorbehaviorsmechanismsmustdisclosedinvestigatedinfluencedexplainedsupervisoraffectspost-graduatelearningprocessintegratingcognitiverolecongruity1sample301students60teamsfourChinesebusinessschools2experimentalvignettemethodologyenhancefindings'internalexternalvalidityprovidedevidencecausalityBasedtwocomplementarystudiesfoundsignificantlyinhibitedacceptanceclimateteamindirecteffectviasignificantsfemalesupervisorsImplicationsdifferenceseducationdiscussedSupervisors'

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)