Diagnostic Performance of Afirma and Interpace Diagnostics Genetic Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single Center Study.

Emad Kandil, Tyler A Metz, Peter P Issa, Mohamed Aboueisha, Mahmoud Omar, Abdallah S Attia, Bert Chabot, Mohammad Hussein, Krzysztof Moroz, Mohamed Shama, Eman Toraih
Author Information
  1. Emad Kandil: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  2. Tyler A Metz: Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. ORCID
  3. Peter P Issa: School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. ORCID
  4. Mohamed Aboueisha: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  5. Mahmoud Omar: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  6. Abdallah S Attia: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  7. Bert Chabot: Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  8. Mohammad Hussein: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  9. Krzysztof Moroz: Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  10. Mohamed Shama: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
  11. Eman Toraih: Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITN) represent 20-30% of biopsied nodules, with a 10-60% risk of malignancy. Molecular testing can stratify the risk of malignancy among ITNs, and subsequently reduce the need for unnecessary diagnostic surgery. We aimed to assess the performance of these molecular tests at a single institution. Patients with Bethesda III, IV, and V nodules with Afirma and Interpace Diagnostics genetic testing data from November 2013 to November 2021 were included. Three cohorts were formed, including GSC + XA, ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR, and GSC + GEC. Statistical analysis determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and accuracy of each type of testing. The PPV of nodules undergoing genetic testing by ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR (45.00%, 95%CI: 28.28-62.93%, = 0.032) and GSC + XA (57.14%, 95%CI: 29.32-81.08%, < 0.001) were superior to that of GEC + GSC (30.72%, 95%CI: 26.83-34.90%). The NPV was above 85% in all cohorts, suggesting overall suitable rule-out tests. The Afirma platform (GSC + XA) had the highest NPV at 96.97%. The overall accuracy for nodules undergoing ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR was 81.42% (95%CI: 73.01-88.11%, < 0.001). A total of 230 patients underwent thyroidectomy, including less than 60% of each of the ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR and GSC + XA cohorts. Specifically, only 25% of patients in the GSC + XA cohort underwent surgery, considerably decreasing the rate of unnecessary surgical intervention. Sub-group analysis, including only patients with surgical pathology, found that PPV tended to be higher in the GSC + XA cohort, at 66.67% (95%CI: 37.28-87.06%), as compared to the ThyGeNEXT + ThyraMIR cohort, at 52.94% (95%CI: 35.25-69.92%). The Afirma genetic testing platform GSC + XA outperformed the other platforms with regards to both PPV and NPV and decreased the rate of surgery in patients with ITNs by 75%, significantly preventing unnecessary surgical intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Sep;393(5):667-73 [PMID: 18633639]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 23;367(8):705-15 [PMID: 22731672]
  3. JAMA Surg. 2018 Sep 1;153(9):817-824 [PMID: 29799911]
  4. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;13(7):415-424 [PMID: 28361927]
  5. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Jan;124(1):14-27 [PMID: 26348024]
  6. Endocr Pract. 2017 Apr 2;23(4):442-450 [PMID: 28095042]
  7. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec 06;: [PMID: 36470585]
  8. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Oct;124(10):711-721 [PMID: 27223344]
  9. Laryngoscope. 2010 Dec;120(12):2446-51 [PMID: 21108428]
  10. Thyroid. 2019 Sep;29(9):1237-1243 [PMID: 31407625]
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3996-4001 [PMID: 25862581]
  12. Curr Probl Surg. 2019 Mar;56(3):103-127 [PMID: 30798796]
  13. JAMA. 2018 Mar 06;319(9):914-924 [PMID: 29509871]
  14. Thyroid. 2019 May;29(5):650-656 [PMID: 30803388]
  15. Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1005-13 [PMID: 23244801]
  16. Surgery. 2017 Jan;161(1):16-24 [PMID: 27836213]
  17. J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):189-92 [PMID: 23777982]
  18. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Apr 1;143(4):403-408 [PMID: 27978562]
  19. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Apr 18;9:179 [PMID: 29720964]
  20. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 11;10:612 [PMID: 31572297]
  21. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jun;70(6):500-507 [PMID: 27798083]
  22. Thyroid. 2022 Nov;32(11):1362-1371 [PMID: 35943886]
  23. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 13;12:649522 [PMID: 34054725]
  24. Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1341-1346 [PMID: 29091573]
  25. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Sep;47(9):853-862 [PMID: 31245935]
  26. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009 Aug;39(8):699-706 [PMID: 19601965]
  27. Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133 [PMID: 26462967]
  28. JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):1105-1113 [PMID: 36223097]
  29. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Aug;123(8):454-60 [PMID: 25964216]
  30. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul 1;143(7):738-739 [PMID: 28448647]
  31. Endocr Pract. 2019 Feb;25(2):161-164 [PMID: 30383497]
  32. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018 Mar;25(3):R163-R177 [PMID: 29255094]

Grants

  1. THYROIDGRANT2021-0000000232/American Thyroid Association
  2. School of Medicine Pilot Grant/Tulane University
  3. The Tulane University Bridge Fund/Tulane University

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0+GSCXAnodulestesting95%CI:AfirmaThyGeNEXTThyraMIRgeneticPPVNPVpatientsunnecessarysurgeryInterpacecohortsincluding0cohortsurgicalIndeterminatethyroidriskmalignancyITNsdiagnostictestsDiagnosticsNovemberGECanalysispredictivevalueaccuracyundergoing<001overallplatformunderwentrateinterventionDiagnosticITNrepresent20-30%biopsied10-60%MolecularcanstratifyamongsubsequentlyreduceneedaimedassessperformancemolecularsingleinstitutionPatientsBethesdaIIIIVVdata20132021includedThreeformedStatisticaldeterminedsensitivityspecificitypositivenegativeoddsratioDORtype4500%2828-6293%=0325714%2932-8108%superior3072%2683-3490%85%suggestingsuitablerule-outhighest9697%8142%7301-8811%total230thyroidectomyless60%Specifically25%considerablydecreasingSub-grouppathologyfoundtendedhigher6667%3728-8706%compared5294%3525-6992%outperformedplatformsregardsdecreased75%significantlypreventingPerformanceGeneticTestingThyroidNodules:SingleCenterStudyindeterminatestatisticalmeasures

Similar Articles

Cited By