Information, ingestion, and impulsivity: The impact of technology-enabled healthy food labels on online grocery shopping in impulsive and non-impulsive consumers.

Nikola Ljusic, Asle Fagerstrøm, Valdimar Sigurdsson, Erik Arntzen
Author Information
  1. Nikola Ljusic: Behavior and Technology Lab, School of Economics, Innovation, and Technology, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway.
  2. Asle Fagerstrøm: Behavior and Technology Lab, School of Economics, Innovation, and Technology, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway.
  3. Valdimar Sigurdsson: Centre for Research in Marketing and Consumer Psychology, Department of Business Administration, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  4. Erik Arntzen: Experimental Studies of Complex Human Behavior, Department of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Introduction: Unhealthy food consumption is a problem for society, companies, and consumers. This study aims to contribute to knowledge regarding such issues by investigating how technology-enabled healthy food labels can impact food choice in an online grocery store context. We conceptualized unhealthy and healthy food choice as a matter of impulsivity problems. Three technology-enabled healthy food labels were derived based on variables that might impact self-control, and their influence on food choice was investigated.
Methods: The empirical study consisted of three parts. In the first part, participants' impulsivity was measured using an adjusting delay task. Part two investigated the effects of self-monitoring, pre-commitment, and social comparison-based technology-enabled healthy food labels on food choice in a hypothetical online grocery shopping setting using a choice-based conjoint experiment. Lastly, in the third part, three where demographical questions were asked.
Results: The results ( = 405) show that self-monitoring, pre-commitment, and social comparison-based technology-enabled healthy food labels had the most to least impact on food choice in that order. Furthermore, the results indicate that self-monitoring and pre-commitment labels had more impact on the choice for impulsive compared to non-impulsive participants. Similarly, the results indicate that social comparison had more impact on choice for non-impulsive participants. These findings suggest that self-monitoring of previous healthy food choices might be more effective than pre-commitment based on discounts for healthy food products. However, these differences were minor.
Discussion: This finding has managerial implications as grocery stores might increase their revenue by introducing self-monitoring labels in an online grocery shopping setting. Future research should investigate these technology-enabled healthy food labels in natural food purchase settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health. 2021 Feb;191:59-67 [PMID: 33517247]
  2. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):940-53 [PMID: 19001385]
  3. Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:6-10 [PMID: 30253139]
  4. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Mar - Apr;14(2):109-118 [PMID: 32199860]
  5. Health Commun. 2017 Aug;32(8):1032-1038 [PMID: 27676393]
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):650-6 [PMID: 22271781]
  7. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10): [PMID: 36285932]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Sep;147(9):1349-1381 [PMID: 30148386]
  9. Appetite. 2019 Oct 1;141:104314 [PMID: 31181248]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):427-39 [PMID: 22084499]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1729-1737 [PMID: 31520252]
  12. Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):334-342 [PMID: 30896220]
  13. Appetite. 2018 Jul 1;126:16-25 [PMID: 29551401]
  14. Behav Anal. 2016 Mar 23;39(2):259-268 [PMID: 31978208]
  15. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1803-1849 [PMID: 31270766]
  16. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Dec;19(3):102-129 [PMID: 30760176]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 May;113(3):657-679 [PMID: 32147840]
  18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:307-329 [PMID: 34358579]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15-22 [PMID: 16811561]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):538-46 [PMID: 24390824]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2002 May;13(3):219-24 [PMID: 12009041]
  22. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 20;12(7): [PMID: 32698540]
  23. J Gen Psychol. 2010 Jul-Sep;137(3):273-86 [PMID: 20718227]
  24. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;22(3):222-8 [PMID: 24708144]
  25. Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:25-34 [PMID: 26923097]
  26. J Transl Med. 2019 May 22;17(1):169 [PMID: 31118060]
  27. Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92 [PMID: 15367080]
  28. Foods. 2021 Aug 12;10(8): [PMID: 34441638]
  29. Behav Anal. 2017 Oct 2;40(2):373-391 [PMID: 31976942]
  30. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):10-21 [PMID: 25524395]
  31. Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104485 [PMID: 31605724]
  32. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Jun;43(6):1135-1146 [PMID: 30482934]
  33. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb 1;107(2):247-256 [PMID: 29529158]
  34. Internet Interv. 2019 Oct 19;18:100283 [PMID: 31890630]
  35. Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:88-97 [PMID: 25308434]
  36. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1496-506 [PMID: 21241532]
  37. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 Nov;12(6):1095-1100 [PMID: 29799416]
  38. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e95-e106 [PMID: 20604870]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodhealthylabelschoicetechnology-enabledimpactgroceryonlineself-monitoringpre-commitmentimpulsivitymightsocialshoppingresultsnon-impulsiveconsumersstudybasedinvestigatedthreepartusingdelaycomparison-basedsettingindicateimpulsiveparticipantsIntroduction:UnhealthyconsumptionproblemsocietycompaniesaimscontributeknowledgeregardingissuesinvestigatingcanstorecontextconceptualizedunhealthymatterproblemsThreederivedvariablesself-controlinfluenceMethods:empiricalconsistedpartsfirstparticipants'measuredadjustingtaskParttwoeffectshypotheticalchoice-basedconjointexperimentLastlythirddemographicalquestionsaskedResults:=405showleastorderFurthermorecomparedSimilarlycomparisonfindingssuggestpreviouschoiceseffectivediscountsproductsHoweverdifferencesminorDiscussion:findingmanagerialimplicationsstoresincreaserevenueintroducingFutureresearchinvestigatenaturalpurchasesettingsInformationingestionimpulsivity:consumerbehaviordiscountingtechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By