Examining trust between supervisors and trainees in the pediatric emergency department.

Caroline Andler, Anita R Schmidt, Todd P Chang, Christine S Cho
Author Information
  1. Caroline Andler: Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Los Angeles California USA. ORCID
  2. Anita R Schmidt: Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Los Angeles California USA.
  3. Todd P Chang: Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Los Angeles California USA.
  4. Christine S Cho: Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Los Angeles California USA.

Abstract

Objective: Lack of trust between supervisors and trainees can have harmful consequences. Trust has been examined between physicians, patients, and staff in multiple settings but has not been examined in a bidirectional manner in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Debra Meyerson in 1996 discussed the theory of swift trust, a type of trust that develops quickly between temporary groups through reliance on . Meyerson describes categories as groups unified by social identities such as gender or profession. We explored the applicability of swift trust in the relationship between supervisors and trainees in the PED.
Methods: This multimethods study used qualitative interviews and the validated interpersonal mistrust trust measure (IMTM) to assess baseline trusting style. PED attendings from a single institution and residents from various training levels, specialties, and institutions rotating through the same PED were sampled until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. IMTM scores were triangulated with interviewee's reported trusting styles.
Results: Seventeen PED attendings and 16 residents participated. Residents and attendings emphasized different factors that influence trust. Common factors across groups included affect, the need for vulnerability, and appropriate communication. Most described reliance on certain categories (level of training, specialty, etc.) when making trusting decisions. Categories such as gender and race were noted to be unimportant when making trusting decisions others, although some participants believed these attributes played into decisions made others. Quantitative data from the IMTM supported qualitative conclusions regarding trusting style.
Conclusions: The trusting relationship between supervisors and trainees in the PED dovetails with the swift trust theory. Common factors that influence trust reveal entry points for attendings and residents to improve trust and ultimately prevent negative patient outcomes. Future studies may examine how reliance on categories influences an individual's trust in their colleagues.

References

  1. Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):327-333 [PMID: 34297348]
  2. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S25-8 [PMID: 20881697]
  3. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Jul;103(1):127-33 [PMID: 4003968]
  4. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):860-6 [PMID: 16766739]
  5. Acad Pediatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):597-602 [PMID: 25439158]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 2018 Nov;103(11):1181-1197 [PMID: 29963894]
  7. J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov - Dec;74(6):e111-e118 [PMID: 28669788]
  8. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585 [PMID: 29075375]
  9. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;28(2):217-20 [PMID: 20159394]
  10. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):147-51 [PMID: 15692136]
  11. Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):704-710 [PMID: 34732657]
  12. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):442-445 [PMID: 33208267]
  13. J Soc Psychol. 2004 Jun;144(3):311-21 [PMID: 15168431]
  14. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii58-ii64 [PMID: 23882089]
  15. Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):706-13 [PMID: 25214508]
  16. J Clin Nurs. 2002 May;11(3):314-21 [PMID: 12010528]
  17. J Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;140(3):279-94 [PMID: 10902371]
  18. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  19. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(6):526-31 [PMID: 17483400]
  20. Med Educ. 2015 Aug;49(8):783-95 [PMID: 26152490]
  21. AEM Educ Train. 2023 Apr 11;7(2):e10857 [PMID: 37064493]
  22. Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Fall;3(4):146-9 [PMID: 26495404]
  23. Health Commun. 2019 Oct;34(11):1250-1258 [PMID: 29792519]
  24. Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80 [PMID: 12915363]
  25. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1103-12 [PMID: 26284572]
  26. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):669-70 [PMID: 26692985]
  27. Med Educ. 2018 Mar;52(3):252-253 [PMID: 28895184]
  28. J Interprof Care. 2008 Mar;22(2):133-47 [PMID: 18320449]
  29. Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1576-98 [PMID: 16898980]
  30. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Jun;20(3):255-60 [PMID: 18475092]
  31. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 Aug;19(3):435-56 [PMID: 23892689]
  32. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1367-75 [PMID: 18055687]
  33. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):373-83 [PMID: 10459096]
  34. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jun 27;294(6588):1660 [PMID: 3113577]
  35. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1163-71 [PMID: 16953777]
  36. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(7):1311-21 [PMID: 25293970]
  37. Clin Teach. 2017 Dec;14(6):385-389 [PMID: 28971576]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trustPEDtrustingsupervisorstraineesattendingsswiftgroupsreliancecategoriesIMTMresidentsfactorsdecisionsexaminedpediatricemergencydepartmentMeyersontheorygenderrelationshipqualitativestyletraininginfluenceCommonmakingothersObjective:LackcanharmfulconsequencesTrustphysicianspatientsstaffmultiplesettingsbidirectionalmannerDebra1996discussedtypedevelopsquicklytemporarydescribesunifiedsocialidentitiesprofessionexploredapplicabilityMethods:multimethodsstudyusedinterviewsvalidatedinterpersonalmistrustmeasureassessbaselinesingleinstitutionvariouslevelsspecialtiesinstitutionsrotatingsampledthematicsaturationreachedInterviewsanalyzedusingdirectedcontentanalysisscorestriangulatedinterviewee'sreportedstylesResults:Seventeen16participatedResidentsemphasizeddifferentacrossincludedaffectneedvulnerabilityappropriatecommunicationdescribedcertainlevelspecialtyetcCategoriesracenotedunimportantalthoughparticipantsbelievedattributesplayedmadeQuantitativedatasupportedconclusionsregardingConclusions:dovetailsrevealentrypointsimproveultimatelypreventnegativepatientoutcomesFuturestudiesmayexamineinfluencesindividual'scolleaguesExamining

Similar Articles

Cited By