Foraminal Stenosis at L5-S1 as an Overlooked Pathology of Bilateral Radiculopathy: A Case Series.

Kohei Takahashi, Ajay Kumar Yadav, Ko Hashimoto, Takumi Tsubakino, Toshimi Aizawa, Yasuhisa Tanaka
Author Information
  1. Kohei Takahashi: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Wago-Machi, Yamagata, Japan.
  2. Ajay Kumar Yadav: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Wago-Machi, Yamagata, Japan.
  3. Ko Hashimoto: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Japan.
  4. Takumi Tsubakino: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Wago-Machi, Yamagata, Japan.
  5. Toshimi Aizawa: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Japan.
  6. Yasuhisa Tanaka: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Wago-Machi, Yamagata, Japan.

Abstract

Introduction: The classical symptom of foraminal stenosis is unilateral radiculopathy. Bilateral radiculopathy caused purely by foraminal stenosis is rare. Here, we report five cases of bilateral L5 radiculopathy caused purely by L5-S1 foraminal stenosis and describe the clinical and radiological features of these patients in detail.
Case Presentation: Among the five patients, two were men and three were women with an average age of 69 years. Four patients had undergone surgeries at L4-5 level, previously. All the patients showed an improvement in symptoms in the post-operative period. After a certain period, the patients complained of bilateral leg pain and numbness. An additional surgery was performed in two patients; however, there was no improvement in symptoms. One patient, who did not undergo surgery, was treated conservatively for 3 years. All the patients had been suffering from bilateral leg symptoms before their first visit to our hospital. The neurological findings in these patients were consistent with bilateral L5 radiculopathy. The average pre-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was 13 out of 29 points. Bilateral foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 level was confirmed using a three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed in one patient and bilateral lateral fenestration using Wiltse's approach was performed in four patients. The neurological symptoms recovered immediately after surgery. The average JOA score at 2-year follow-up was 25 points.
Conclusions: Spine surgeons may overlook the pathology of foraminal stenosis, particularly in patients with bilateral radiculopathy. Familiarity with the clinical and radiological features of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis is necessary to properly diagnose bilateral foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 level.

Keywords

References

  1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Jan-Feb;9(1):31-41 [PMID: 6719255]
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971 Jul;53(5):891-903 [PMID: 4326746]
  3. J Orthop Sci. 2015 Mar;20(2):287-94 [PMID: 25491380]
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Nov;16(11):1312-20 [PMID: 1750006]
  5. J Orthop Sci. 2015 Sep;20(5):811-7 [PMID: 26104220]
  6. Korean J Spine. 2017 Mar;14(1):1-6 [PMID: 28407702]
  7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(23):1831-5 [PMID: 26208231]
  8. Clin Neurosurg. 1973;20:204-14 [PMID: 4762808]
  9. Eur Spine J. 2021 Apr;30(4):865-869 [PMID: 33179129]
  10. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Oct 17;10:164 [PMID: 26475270]
  11. Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2269-75 [PMID: 25772088]
  12. Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):e21-5 [PMID: 23523444]
  13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):E569-73 [PMID: 21245783]
  14. Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):987-993 [PMID: 30470865]
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1375-80 [PMID: 17545903]
  16. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):389-94 [PMID: 10703115]
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 May-Jun;9(4):418-21 [PMID: 6236567]
  18. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jun;21(6):783-8 [PMID: 23473979]
  19. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 May;47(3):349-56 [PMID: 19361663]
  20. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24 Suppl 1:S209-14 [PMID: 24292491]
  21. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Apr;17(2):154-7 [PMID: 15260100]
  22. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51(2):153-6 [PMID: 21358163]
  23. Eur Spine J. 2015 Feb;24(2):381-7 [PMID: 25073940]
  24. J Orthop Sci. 2022 Mar 16;: [PMID: 35305864]
  25. Acta Radiol. 2017 Feb;58(2):197-203 [PMID: 27055917]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsforaminalstenosisbilateralradiculopathyBilateralL5-S1symptomsaveragelevelsurgeryperformedcausedpurelyfiveL5clinicalradiologicalfeaturestwoyearsimprovementperiodlegpatientneurologicalJOAscorepointsusinglumbarIntroduction:classicalsymptomunilateralrarereportcasesdescribedetailCasePresentation:Amongmenthreewomenage69FourundergonesurgeriesL4-5previouslyshowedpost-operativecertaincomplainedpainnumbnessadditionalhoweverOneundergotreatedconservatively3sufferingfirstvisithospitalfindingsconsistentpre-operativeJapaneseOrthopedicAssociation1329confirmedthree-dimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomputedtomographyPosteriorinterbodyfusiononelateralfenestrationWiltse'sapproachfourrecoveredimmediately2-yearfollow-up25Conclusions:SpinesurgeonsmayoverlookpathologyparticularlyFamiliaritysymptomaticnecessaryproperlydiagnoseForaminalStenosisOverlookedPathologyRadiculopathy:CaseSeriesL5–S1

Similar Articles

Cited By