Leaf traits divergence and correlations of woody plants among the three plant functional types on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.

Hongshuang Xing, Zuomin Shi, Shun Liu, Miao Chen, Gexi Xu, Xiangwen Cao, Miaomiao Zhang, Jian Chen, Feifan Li
Author Information
  1. Hongshuang Xing: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  2. Zuomin Shi: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  3. Shun Liu: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  4. Miao Chen: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  5. Gexi Xu: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  6. Xiangwen Cao: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  7. Miaomiao Zhang: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  8. Jian Chen: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
  9. Feifan Li: Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Leaf traits are important indicators of plant life history and may vary according to plant functional type (PFT) and environmental conditions. In this study, we sampled woody plants from three PFTs (e.g., needle-leaved evergreens, NE; broad-leaved evergreens, BE; broad-leaved deciduous, BD) on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, and 110 species were collected across 50 sites. Here, the divergence and correlations of leaf traits in three PFTs and relationships between leaf traits and environment were studied. The results showed significant differences in leaf traits among three PFTs, with NE plants showed higher values than BE plants and BD plants for leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf dry mass per area (LMA), carbon: nitrogen ratio (C/N), and nitrogen content per unit area (N), except for nitrogen content per unit mass (N). Although the correlations between leaf traits were similar across three PFTs, NE plants differed from BE plants and BD plants in the relationship between C/N and N. Compared with the mean annual precipitation (MAP), the mean annual temperature (MAT) was the main environmental factor that caused the difference in leaf traits among three PFTs. NE plants had a more conservative approach to survival compared to BE plants and BD plants. This study shed light on the regional-scale variation in leaf traits and the relationships among leaf traits, PFT, and environment. These findings have important implications for the development of regional-scale dynamic vegetation models and for understanding how plants respond and adapt to environmental change.

Keywords

References

  1. Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Jul;45(7):2093-2108 [PMID: 35357711]
  2. Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 04;9(8): [PMID: 32759791]
  3. Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71 [PMID: 26700811]
  4. Ann Bot. 2006 Jan;97(1):97-107 [PMID: 16254019]
  5. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 11;13:845813 [PMID: 35360321]
  6. Tree Physiol. 2007 Jan;27(1):53-61 [PMID: 17169906]
  7. Evolution. 2022 Sep;76(9):1986-2003 [PMID: 35779006]
  8. New Phytol. 2020 Oct;228(1):82-94 [PMID: 32198931]
  9. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 04;11:212 [PMID: 32194599]
  10. Am J Bot. 1999 Sep;86(9):1272-81 [PMID: 10487815]
  11. New Phytol. 2022 Oct;236(1):71-85 [PMID: 35727175]
  12. AoB Plants. 2015 Jun 08;7: [PMID: 26056133]
  13. Science. 2017 Sep 1;357(6354):917-921 [PMID: 28860384]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):5616-21 [PMID: 24706791]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 1;871:162036 [PMID: 36746282]
  16. New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(2):480-495 [PMID: 21477008]
  17. Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;11(7): [PMID: 35406887]
  18. Int J Biometeorol. 2012 Sep;56(5):915-26 [PMID: 21969112]
  19. J Plant Physiol. 2021 Oct;265:153489 [PMID: 34416600]
  20. Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 01;12(3):e8680 [PMID: 35261755]
  21. Ecol Appl. 2017 Jul;27(5):1421-1434 [PMID: 28370740]
  22. New Phytol. 2001 Oct;152(1):69-83 [PMID: 35974476]
  23. Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jul;21(7):2711-2725 [PMID: 25611734]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):740-5 [PMID: 24379395]
  25. Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):98-111 [PMID: 12650465]
  26. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jul;23(7):2783-2800 [PMID: 27859952]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 15;843:157002 [PMID: 35772540]
  28. Ecol Lett. 2009 Sep;12(9):865-72 [PMID: 19572916]
  29. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0123741 [PMID: 25919023]
  30. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):259-91 [PMID: 16573844]
  31. Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7 [PMID: 15103368]
  32. Evol Appl. 2020 Jun 09;13(9):2377-2391 [PMID: 33005228]
  33. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):23807 [PMID: 34893677]
  34. New Phytol. 2022 May;234(3):1047-1058 [PMID: 35133649]
  35. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38345 [PMID: 22685562]
  36. J Plant Physiol. 2022 May;272:153671 [PMID: 35381492]
  37. Oecologia. 1986 Jul;69(4):577-588 [PMID: 28311619]
  38. Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 26;13:902509 [PMID: 35720582]
  39. New Phytol. 2022 Aug;235(3):923-938 [PMID: 35510798]
  40. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2482-2498 [PMID: 27782353]
  41. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 30;12:679726 [PMID: 34394139]
  42. Am J Bot. 2013 Jul;100(7):1306-21 [PMID: 23825139]
  43. Tree Physiol. 2021 Aug 11;41(8):1336-1352 [PMID: 33440428]
  44. Ecol Lett. 2015 Dec;18(12):1406-19 [PMID: 26415616]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plantsleaftraitsthreePFTsplantNEBEBDamongfunctionalenvironmentalcorrelationscontentpernitrogenNLeafimportanttypePFTstudywoodyevergreensbroad-leavedeasternQinghai-TibetanPlateauacrossdivergencerelationshipsenvironmentshoweddrymassareaC/Nunitmeanannualsurvivalregional-scaleindicatorslifehistorymayvaryaccordingconditionssampledegneedle-leaveddeciduous110speciescollected50sitesstudiedresultssignificantdifferenceshighervaluesthicknessLTmatterLDMCLMAcarbon:ratioexceptAlthoughsimilardifferedrelationshipComparedprecipitationMAPtemperatureMATmainfactorcauseddifferenceconservativeapproachcomparedshedlightvariationfindingsimplicationsdevelopmentdynamicvegetationmodelsunderstandingrespondadaptchangetypesChinaclimateelevationtraitstrategy

Similar Articles

Cited By