All-shot Aspirations in Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Are Associated With Malignancy.

Xuefeng Sun, Ting Zhang, Chi Shao, Ping Wang, Minjiang Chen, Jing Zhao, Mengzhao Wang
Author Information
  1. Xuefeng Sun: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. ORCID
  2. Ting Zhang: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  3. Chi Shao: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  4. Ping Wang: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  5. Minjiang Chen: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  6. Jing Zhao: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  7. Mengzhao Wang: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Aspirations without a tissue core are common in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration procedures. However, the diagnostic value of all-shot aspirations and no-tissue-core aspirations is unclear. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with the description of all-shot or no-tissue-core aspirations was conducted at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and March 2021. patients' pathologic and clinical diagnoses were retrieved and compared between all-shot patients (all aspirations had a tissue core) and no-tissue-core patients (at least one aspiration had no tissue core). Among all 505 patients with 1402 aspirations, 356 (70.5%) patients, and 1184 (84.5%) aspirations were all-shot. Pathologic diagnosis after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration revealed neoplasms in 46.1% of all-shot patients, but 33.6% of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.52;  = .009). Final clinical diagnosis revealed Malignancy in 53.1% of all-shot patients, but 37.6% of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.78;  = .001). In 133 patients with pathologic nonspecific findings, a clinical diagnosis of Malignancy was proven in 25 of 79 (31.6%) of all-shot patients, but only 6 of 54 (11.1%) of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-9.79;  = .006). patients with all-shot aspirations in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration are more likely to have the pathologic and clinical diagnosis of Malignancy. More measures should be taken to exclude Malignancy in all-shot patients when the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was nondiagnostic.

Keywords

References

  1. Thorac Cancer. 2010 May;1(1):9-16 [PMID: 27755787]
  2. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 May 1;24(5):534 [PMID: 32398204]
  3. Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 1;18(17):2095-107 [PMID: 15314031]
  4. Respirology. 2019 Jun;24(6):531-542 [PMID: 30912244]
  5. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 2;15(12):e0243181 [PMID: 33264372]
  6. J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Feb;26(2):274-8 [PMID: 21286021]
  7. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jul;61(7):390-6 [PMID: 23436118]
  8. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):155 [PMID: 31429741]
  9. Ann Thorac Med. 2012 Oct;7(4):210-4 [PMID: 23189097]
  10. Respiration. 2018;95(4):251-257 [PMID: 29320774]
  11. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Sep;3(9):985-8 [PMID: 18758300]
  12. Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):322-5 [PMID: 14718460]
  13. Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):122-8 [PMID: 15249452]
  14. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7 [PMID: 18064739]
  15. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Nov;13(6):408-15 [PMID: 22694791]
  16. Respiration. 2017;94(2):216-223 [PMID: 28531883]
  17. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Mar;127(3):344-7 [PMID: 6830056]
  18. Chest. 2008 Aug;134(2):368-374 [PMID: 18263688]
  19. Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):480-7 [PMID: 25216770]

MeSH Term

Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Lymph Nodes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsall-shotaspirationaspirationsendobronchialtransbronchialneedleno-tissue-coreultrasound-guided1malignancyclinicaldiagnosistissuecorepathologic1%6%oddsratio95%confidenceinterval = Aspirations705%revealed79withoutcommonproceduresHoweverdiagnosticvalueunclearretrospectiveanalysisunderwentdescriptionconductedtertiaryhospitalJanuary2017March2021Patients'diagnosesretrievedcomparedleastoneAmong5051402356118484Pathologicneoplasms46336914-252009Final53378827-278001133nonspecificfindingsproven253165411340-9006PatientslikelymeasurestakenexcludenondiagnosticAll-shotEndobronchialUltrasound-GuidedTransbronchialNeedleAspirationEBUS-TBNAAssociatedMalignancyultrasoundneoplasm

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.