A Real-World Data Study on the Impact of the ReadRx Cognitive Training and Reading Intervention on Cognition, Basic Reading Ability, and Psychosocial Skills for 3527 Children.

Amy Lawson Moore, Terissa M Miller, Jeffrey J Moore, Christina Ledbetter
Author Information
  1. Amy Lawson Moore: Department of Psychology, Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. ORCID
  2. Terissa M Miller: Department of Psychology, Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
  3. Jeffrey J Moore: Department of Psychology, Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
  4. Christina Ledbetter: Department of Psychology, Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.

Abstract

Background: The state of reading proficiency among children in the United States continues to be a subject of concern among psychologists, teachers, parents, policy makers, and the education community at large. Despite the widespread use of curricular methods that teach basic reading skills, there remains a large percentage of children that struggle to read. Therefore, novel approaches to reading remediation should be explored.
Purpose: The aims of this study were to examine 1) the effect of a multicomponent cognitive and reading intervention on cognitive and reading skills; 2) the role of ADHD, age, sex, IQ score, and individual cognitive skills on the effectiveness of the ReadRx intervention; and 3) parent-reported behavioral outcomes following the ReadRx intervention.
Methods: The current study analyzed a large real-world dataset to examine cognitive, reading, and behavioral outcomes for struggling readers (n = 3527) who had completed 24 weeks (120 hours) of intense cognitive training integrated with a structured literacy intervention using ReadRx in a one-on-one clinic setting.
Results: Analyses of pretest and post-test scores showed statistically significant changes on all cognitive and reading measures including attention, visual processing, processing speed, long-term memory, working memory, reasoning, phonological awareness, Work Attack, phonetic coding, spelling, comprehension, and overall IQ score with medium to very large effect sizes. The results included an average 4.1-year gain in reading skills including a 6-year gain in phonological awareness. No differences were found based on age, sex, or ADHD status, and minimal differences were found based on pre-intervention IQ score and cognitive test scores. The study also included a qualitative thematic analysis of parent-reported behavioral outcomes revealing themes of improved cognition, academic performance, and psychosocial skills including confidence and perseverance.
Conclusion: Our findings were consistent with previous controlled studies on this intervention and offer an encouraging alternative instructional approach to reading remediation that aligns with the Science of Reading and includes intensive remediation of underlying cognitive skills.

Keywords

References

  1. Am Psychol. 2019 May-Jun;74(4):445-458 [PMID: 30234314]
  2. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):864-874 [PMID: 30458546]
  3. J Learn Disabil. 2001 Sep-Oct;34(5):394-400 [PMID: 15503588]
  4. J Learn Disabil. 2022 May-Jun;55(3):171-184 [PMID: 34365842]
  5. PeerJ. 2020 Mar 16;8:e8772 [PMID: 32211239]
  6. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 07;8:120 [PMID: 24639640]
  7. Brain. 2010 Mar;133(Pt 3):868-79 [PMID: 20061325]
  8. Except Child. 2009 Oct 1;76(1):31-51 [PMID: 20224749]
  9. Children (Basel). 2019 Mar 20;6(3): [PMID: 30897845]
  10. Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1187 [PMID: 31178799]
  11. Except Child. 2021 Jul;87(4):397-417 [PMID: 34629488]
  12. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(5):815-826 [PMID: 27867257]
  13. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2946-58 [PMID: 23816630]
  14. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1667-71 [PMID: 15173489]
  15. J Learn Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;45(2):99-127 [PMID: 20445204]
  16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jun 19;62(6):1839-1858 [PMID: 31112436]
  17. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:19-28 [PMID: 29304447]
  18. PLoS One. 2013 May 27;8(5):e63859 [PMID: 23724008]
  19. Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:584565 [PMID: 33584467]
  20. J Learn Disabil. 2017 Mar/Apr;50(2):115-127 [PMID: 26712799]
  21. Read Writ. 2017;30(1):105-120 [PMID: 28163387]
  22. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019 May;2019(165):25-54 [PMID: 31046202]
  23. Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):897-916 [PMID: 29938776]
  24. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51 [PMID: 29890888]
  25. J Learn Disabil. 2017 Jul/Aug;50(4):408-421 [PMID: 26825667]
  26. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:451-75 [PMID: 18154503]
  27. Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):1802-1816 [PMID: 29884983]
  28. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:749898 [PMID: 34777146]
  29. Cognition. 2006 Sep;101(2):385-413 [PMID: 16844106]
  30. Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2015 Nov 1;30(4):159-170 [PMID: 26997755]
  31. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Jun 26;14:1671-1683 [PMID: 29983567]
  32. J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):24-33 [PMID: 15490889]
  33. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Jan;24(1):91-103 [PMID: 28774351]
  34. PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0176488 [PMID: 28545039]
  35. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3454-65 [PMID: 21903119]
  36. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;38(6):387-407 [PMID: 35274592]
  37. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 04;8(4):e58097 [PMID: 23593117]
  38. Cortex. 2010 Nov-Dec;46(10):1345-61 [PMID: 20828676]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readingcognitiveskillsinterventionlargeReadRxremediationstudyIQscorebehavioraloutcomestrainingincludingawarenessReadingamongchildrenexamineeffectADHDagesexparent-reported3527literacyscoresprocessingmemoryphonologicalincludedgaindifferencesfoundbasedBackground:stateproficiencyUnitedStatescontinuessubjectconcernpsychologiststeachersparentspolicymakerseducationcommunityDespitewidespreadusecurricularmethodsteachbasicremainspercentagestrugglereadThereforenovelapproachesexploredPurpose:aims1multicomponent2roleindividualeffectiveness3followingMethods:currentanalyzedreal-worlddatasetstrugglingreadersn=completed24weeks120hoursintenseintegratedstructuredusingone-on-oneclinicsettingResults:Analysespretestpost-testshowedstatisticallysignificantchangesmeasuresattentionvisualspeedlong-termworkingreasoningWorkAttackphoneticcodingspellingcomprehensionoverallmediumsizesresultsaverage41-year6-yearstatusminimalpre-interventiontestalsoqualitativethematicanalysisrevealingthemesimprovedcognitionacademicperformancepsychosocialconfidenceperseveranceConclusion:findingsconsistentpreviouscontrolledstudiesofferencouragingalternativeinstructionalapproachalignsScienceincludesintensiveunderlyingReal-WorldDataStudyImpactCognitiveTrainingInterventionCognitionBasicAbilityPsychosocialSkillsChildrenLearningRxbraindyslexiaphonemicdisorder

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.