Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Test of Connecting Latinos en Parejas: A Couples-Based HIV Prevention Intervention for Latino Male Couples.

Omar Martinez, M Isabel Fernandez, Cui Yang, Elwin Wu, Omar Valentin, Mallory Johnson
Author Information
  1. Omar Martinez: College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. ORCID
  2. M Isabel Fernandez: College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
  3. Cui Yang: College of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  4. Elwin Wu: School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  5. Omar Valentin: College of Medicine, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
  6. Mallory Johnson: School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Abstract

Despite recent emphasis on couples-based HIV prevention interventions, efficacious interventions for Latino male couples have yet to be tested. The study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the Connecting Latinos en Pareja (CLP) intervention, a couples-based HIV prevention intervention for Latino male couples. This pilot demonstrated high feasibility, meeting targets for recruitment, retention, and intervention completion. We recruited a diverse cohort of 46 individuals/23 couples with a retention rate of 80% over 6 months and a 100% intervention completion rate in both conditions (four structured couple sessions in each condition). This pilot RCT was not powered to detect significant intervention impact on the primary outcome; however, there was a significant increase in relationship functioning among couples in the intervention group relative to controls and promising trends in changes in several key outcome and mediating variables. Secondary analysis documented trends in the expected directions for several other key hypothesized mechanisms of action (stimulant use, psychological symptoms, quality of life) as well as the primary outcome of proportion of protected sex acts (overall and broken out by main vs. outside partners). Qualitative exit interviews revealed high levels of acceptability of the CLP intervention. Participants highlighted affective component of the intervention and perceived effectiveness in improving dyadic communication skills and safer sex practices. Our findings show that a pilot trial of CLP is highly feasible and acceptable, with CLP demonstrating promising evidence of changes in key intervention mechanisms.

Keywords

References

  1. AIDS Behav. 2016 Feb;20(2):439-48 [PMID: 26552658]
  2. AIDS Care. 2022 Nov;34(11):1465-1472 [PMID: 35848490]
  3. AIDS Behav. 2017 Aug;21(8):2464-2478 [PMID: 28083833]
  4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67 [PMID: 20637084]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2762-2769 [PMID: 30091946]
  6. AIDS. 2005 May 20;19(8):807-14 [PMID: 15867495]
  7. Cult Health Sex. 2008 Jun;10(5):513-27 [PMID: 18568873]
  8. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1594-601 [PMID: 20625011]
  9. AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):404-11 [PMID: 21614560]
  10. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2006 Apr;12(2):367-75 [PMID: 16719583]
  11. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):279 [PMID: 35232455]
  12. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e055448 [PMID: 34475191]
  13. Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):19 [PMID: 33407784]
  14. Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):514 [PMID: 35725624]
  15. AIDS Educ Prev. 2015 Aug;27(4):312-32 [PMID: 26241382]
  16. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022 May;36(5):194-203 [PMID: 35507322]
  17. Violence Vict. 1997 Summer;12(2):173-84 [PMID: 9403987]
  18. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 May 1;95(5):368-374 [PMID: 28479638]
  19. Subst Abus. 2016 Apr-Jun;37(2):336-42 [PMID: 26453188]
  20. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Feb;31(1):1-3 [PMID: 18183570]
  21. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1561-2 [PMID: 26501530]
  22. Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):27-31 [PMID: 31725313]
  23. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 06;10:1 [PMID: 20053272]
  24. Cult Health Sex. 2009 Jan;11(1):17-34 [PMID: 19234948]
  25. J Sex Res. 2007 May;44(2):181-9 [PMID: 17599275]
  26. J Lat Psychol. 2022 Aug;10(3):241-252 [PMID: 36246414]
  27. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):86-94 [PMID: 17577653]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):2158 [PMID: 34819058]
  29. Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1043-1045 [PMID: 33617767]
  30. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015 Dec;12(4):516-22 [PMID: 26412083]
  31. AIDS Care. 2006 Nov;18(8):1018-24 [PMID: 17012094]
  32. AIDS. 2009 Jan 14;23(2):243-52 [PMID: 19098494]
  33. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):484-9 [PMID: 16651505]
  34. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1 [PMID: 29611687]
  35. AIDS Behav. 2011 Nov;15(8):1745-54 [PMID: 21766193]
  36. Open AIDS J. 2010 May 14;4:123-31 [PMID: 20657720]
  37. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e037468 [PMID: 33753428]
  38. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88 [PMID: 28126032]
  39. AIDS Behav. 2014 Oct;18(10):1864-87 [PMID: 24980246]
  40. Psychol Methods. 2013 Jun;18(2):220-36 [PMID: 23458720]
  41. Am J Public Health. 2002 Dec;92(12):1964-9 [PMID: 12453817]
  42. AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr;15 Suppl 1:S80-7 [PMID: 21336607]
  43. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 May;29(5):844-54 [PMID: 15897730]
  44. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9 [PMID: 21035130]
  45. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12 [PMID: 15189396]
  46. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 May;46(4):987-999 [PMID: 27633063]
  47. AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2700-2708 [PMID: 27098408]
  48. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0267031 [PMID: 35427397]
  49. Violence Vict. 1999 Winter;14(4):413-25 [PMID: 10751048]
  50. AIDS Behav. 2021 Apr;25(4):1219-1235 [PMID: 33190178]
  51. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec;55 Suppl 2:S98-101 [PMID: 21406997]
  52. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jul;97(7 Suppl):32S-37S [PMID: 16080455]
  53. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 May 20;2:25 [PMID: 27965844]
  54. AIDS Behav. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-327 [PMID: 34297275]
  55. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205 [PMID: 26978655]
  56. AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2369-2381 [PMID: 33630199]
  57. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 25;11(5):e29389 [PMID: 35612881]
  58. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2022 Mar 1;17(2):65-71 [PMID: 35067595]
  59. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Apr 1;80(4):404-413 [PMID: 30730356]

Grants

  1. R25 DA028567/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. U01 PS005124/NCHHSTP CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Feasibility Studies
Hispanic or Latino
HIV Infections
Pilot Projects
Quality of Life
Safe Sex
Male

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventioncouplesHIVLatinoCLPcouples-basedpreventionmalefeasibilityacceptabilitypilotoutcomekeyinterventionsConnectingLatinosenhighretentioncompletionratesignificantprimarypromisingtrendschangesseveralmechanismssextrialDespiterecentemphasisefficaciousyettestedstudyexaminedParejademonstratedmeetingtargetsrecruitmentrecruiteddiversecohort46individuals/2380%6months100%conditionsfourstructuredcouplesessionsconditionRCTpowereddetectimpacthoweverincreaserelationshipfunctioningamonggrouprelativecontrolsmediatingvariablesSecondaryanalysisdocumentedexpecteddirectionshypothesizedactionstimulantusepsychologicalsymptomsqualitylifewellproportionprotectedactsoverallbrokenmainvsoutsidepartnersQualitativeexitinterviewsrevealedlevelsParticipantshighlightedaffectivecomponentperceivedeffectivenessimprovingdyadiccommunicationskillssaferpracticesfindingsshowhighlyfeasibleacceptabledemonstratingevidenceFeasibilityAcceptabilityPilotTestParejas:Couples-BasedPreventionInterventionMaleCouples

Similar Articles

Cited By