Serum lactate dehydrogenase level predicts the prognosis in bladder cancer patients.

Shuo Gu, Chao Yang
Author Information
  1. Shuo Gu: Department of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, 223300, China. gsmedical@sina.com.
  2. Chao Yang: Department of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, 223300, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, several studies investigated the association between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and the prognosis of urothelial carcinoma. However, no studies explored the role of serum LDH level in the survival of overall bladder cancer (BC). In this study, we intended to address the association of LDH level with the prognosis of BC.
METHODS: 206 patients with BC were included in this study. The clinical data and blood samples of patients were collected. The overall survival and progression-free survival were used. Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test were used to evaluate the effects of LDH level on the survival of BC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to identify prognosis predictors of BC.
RESULTS: Data indicated that serum LDH level in the BC patients was significantly higher than those in controls. In addition, this study suggested that serum LDH level was associated with T stage, N stage, tumor size, M stage, pathological type, and lymphovascular invasion. The Kaplan-Meier analysis found significant differences in the OS and PFS rate between lower and higher serum LDH level groups (LDH ≥ 225 U/L and < 225 U/L). Multivariate Cox regression indicated that pathological type, T2-3, and higher level of LDH were independently associated with adverse prognosis in BC patients.
CONCLUSION: The higher serum LDH level (≥ 225 U/L) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with BC. Serum LDH level could be used as a novel predictive biomarker for BC patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Radiother Oncol. 1993 May;27(2):117-22 [PMID: 8356221]
  2. Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):2954-9 [PMID: 20564400]
  3. Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):76.e11-76.e17 [PMID: 31864938]
  4. Urology. 2002 Feb;59(2):232-8; discussion 238-9 [PMID: 11834392]
  5. Urol Oncol. 2017 Jul;35(7):457.e15-457.e21 [PMID: 28110856]
  6. JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1980-1991 [PMID: 33201207]
  7. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2015 Jun 01;20(8):1234-49 [PMID: 25961554]
  8. Front Oncol. 2020 May 20;10:677 [PMID: 32509573]
  9. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):169-182 [PMID: 30638582]
  10. Urology. 2002 May;59(5):681-7 [PMID: 11992840]
  11. JAMA. 2011 Aug 17;306(7):737-45 [PMID: 21846855]
  12. Immunol Rev. 2020 May;295(1):187-202 [PMID: 32157706]
  13. BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):911-7 [PMID: 24053651]
  14. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):341-345.e3 [PMID: 26868330]
  15. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;4(4):530-536 [PMID: 27073656]
  16. Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 22;5:9800 [PMID: 25902419]
  17. Cancer. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):123-33 [PMID: 8004569]
  18. Cancer. 2002 Aug 15;95(4):751-7 [PMID: 12209718]
  19. BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):783-6 [PMID: 26435378]
  20. Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):5096-5106 [PMID: 30151961]
  21. Urol Oncol. 2019 Feb;37(2):108-115 [PMID: 30478012]
  22. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1275-81 [PMID: 23123368]
  23. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;17(19):6250-6261 [PMID: 21844011]
  24. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 22;10(1):e0115895 [PMID: 25612215]
  25. Urol Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(2):38.e1-38.e8 [PMID: 27693091]
  26. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424 [PMID: 30207593]

MeSH Term

Humans
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Prognosis
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lactate Dehydrogenases
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Lactate Dehydrogenases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LDHlevelBCpatientsprognosisserumsurvivalhighercancerstudyusedassociatedstagestudiesassociationlactatedehydrogenaseoverallbladderKaplan-MeierCoxregressionindicatedpathologicaltypeSerumBACKGROUND:RecentlyseveralinvestigatedurothelialcarcinomaHoweverexploredroleintendedaddressMETHODS:206includedclinicaldatabloodsamplescollectedprogression-freemethodLogranktestevaluateeffectsUnivariatemultivariateanalysesutilizedidentifypredictorsRESULTS:DatasignificantlycontrolsadditionsuggestedTNtumorsizeMlymphovascularinvasionanalysisfoundsignificantdifferencesOSPFSratelowergroupsLDH ≥ 225 U/Land < 225 U/LMultivariateT2-3independentlyadverseCONCLUSION:≥ 225 U/LpoornovelpredictivebiomarkerpredictsBladderPrognosticmarkerProgressionSurvival

Similar Articles

Cited By