Inequalities in smoking among pregnant women in North West London.

Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Edward Mullins
Author Information
  1. Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes: The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, Fourth Floor Translation and Innovation Hub, London W12 0BZ, UK.
  2. Edward Mullins: The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, Fourth Floor Translation and Innovation Hub, London W12 0BZ, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: London has the lowest smoking prevalence among pregnant women in England. However, it was unclear whether the low overall prevalence masked inequalities. This study investigated the prevalence of smoking among pregnant women in North West London stratified by ethnicity and deprivation.
METHODS: Data regarding smoking status, ethnicity and deprivation were extracted from electronic health records collected by maternity services at Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust between January 2020 and August 2022.
RESULTS: A total of 25 231 women were included in this study. At the time of booking of antenatal care (mean of 12 weeks), 4% of women were current smokers, 17% were ex-smokers and 78% never smokers. There were marked differences in the smoking prevalence between ethnic groups. Women of Mixed-White and Black Caribbean ethnicity and White Irish women had the highest prevalence of smoking (12 and 9%, respectively). There was an over 4-fold increase in the prevalence of smoking between the most and the least deprived groups (5.6 versus 1.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Even in a population with an overall low prevalence of smoking in pregnancy, women experiencing deprivation and from certain ethnic backgrounds have a high smoking prevalence and hence are the most likely to benefit from smoking cessation interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3):208-15 [PMID: 10198660]
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):45-52 [PMID: 20547278]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 10;19(24): [PMID: 36554473]
  4. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23163 [PMID: 21826237]
  5. Prev Med. 2015 Jun;75:75-85 [PMID: 25843244]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 01;20(3): [PMID: 36768007]
  7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1207-1215 [PMID: 36175683]
  8. Health Promot Int. 2001 Dec;16(4):355-65 [PMID: 11733454]
  9. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):278-286 [PMID: 30010829]
  10. BMJ. 2022 Oct 19;379:e071522 [PMID: 36261162]
  11. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e049075 [PMID: 34785546]
  12. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):e388-e390 [PMID: 35373818]
  13. Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Aug 26;20:70 [PMID: 36118558]
  14. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e066214 [PMID: 36600341]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Female
Pregnancy
Humans
Pregnant Women
London
Smoking
Prenatal Care
Ethnicity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0smokingprevalencewomenLondonamongpregnantethnicitydeprivationlowoverallinequalitiesstudyNorthWestsmokersethnicgroupspregnancyBACKGROUND:lowestEnglandHoweverunclearwhethermaskedinvestigatedstratifiedMETHODS:DataregardingstatusextractedelectronichealthrecordscollectedmaternityservicesImperialHealthcareNHSTrustJanuary2020August2022RESULTS:total25 231includedtimebookingantenatalcaremean12 weeks4%current17%ex-smokers78%nevermarkeddifferencesWomenMixed-WhiteBlackCaribbeanWhiteIrishhighest129%respectively4-foldincreaseleastdeprived56versus13%CONCLUSIONS:EvenpopulationexperiencingcertainbackgroundshighhencelikelybenefitcessationinterventionsInequalities

Similar Articles

Cited By