Neurophysiological markers of emotion regulation predict efficacy of entrepreneurship education.

Pablo Egana-delSol, Xiaoxiao Sun, Paul Sajda
Author Information
  1. Pablo Egana-delSol: School of Business, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Viña del Mar, Chile. pablo.egana@uai.cl.
  2. Xiaoxiao Sun: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
  3. Paul Sajda: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that programs targeting the socio-emotional dimensions of entrepreneurship-e.g., resilience, personal initiative, and empathy-are more highly correlated with success along with key business metrics, such as sales and survival, than programs with a narrow, technical bent-e.g., accounting and finance. We argue that programs designed to foster socio-emotional skills are effective in improving entrepreneurship outcomes because they improve the students' ability to regulate their emotions. They enhance the individuals' disposition to make more measured, rational decisions. We test this hypothesis studying a randomized controlled trial (RCT, RCT ID: AEARCTR-0000916) of an entrepreneurship program in Chile. We combine administrative data, surveys, and neuro-psychological data from lab-in-the-field measurements. A key methodological contribution of this study is the use of the electroencephalogram (EEG) to quantify the impact of emotional responses. We find that the program has a positive and significant impact on educational outcomes and, in line with the findings of other studies in the literature, we find no impact on self-reported measures of socio-emotional skills (e.g., grit and locus of control) and creativity. Our novel insight comes from the finding that the program has a significant impact on neurophysiological markers, decreasing arousal (a proxy of alertness), valence (a proxy for withdrawal from or approachability to an event or stimuli), and neuro-psychological changes to negative stimuli.

References

  1. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Mar;15(3):193-201 [PMID: 24518415]
  2. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;21(7): [PMID: 33810613]
  3. Q J Econ. 2016 Nov;131(4):1973-2042 [PMID: 33087990]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):476-82 [PMID: 18466409]
  5. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 29;10:1465 [PMID: 31849711]
  6. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):341-50 [PMID: 22275168]
  7. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jul;10(7):1015-9 [PMID: 25479792]
  8. Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):967-74 [PMID: 15528097]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10155-10162 [PMID: 16801553]
  10. Dev Rev. 2008;28(1):62-77 [PMID: 18688292]
  11. Emotion. 2008 Aug;8(4):560-72 [PMID: 18729586]
  12. Science. 2017 Sep 22;357(6357):1287-1290 [PMID: 28935805]
  13. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:573734 [PMID: 23634176]
  14. Q J Econ. 2011;126(1):103-43 [PMID: 21853617]
  15. Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):451-62 [PMID: 19733618]
  16. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1215-29 [PMID: 12495527]
  17. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010 Mar;14(2):186-97 [PMID: 19858033]
  18. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):72-9 [PMID: 23150274]
  19. Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 1:162-72 [PMID: 24269801]
  20. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1087-101 [PMID: 17547490]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 13;9:63 [PMID: 25762912]
  22. Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):267-86 [PMID: 11316014]
  23. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1-28 [PMID: 5340840]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:799-823 [PMID: 25251484]
  25. Comput Biol Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):2230-7 [PMID: 24290940]
  26. Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 02;9:254 [PMID: 29551984]
  27. Science. 2014 May 30;344(6187):998-1001 [PMID: 24876490]
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(2):330-41 [PMID: 2319445]
  29. Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13376 [PMID: 35927322]
  30. Hum Nat. 1990 Sep;1(3):261-89 [PMID: 24222085]
  31. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2188-91 [PMID: 22254773]
  32. Q J Econ. 2017 Feb;132(1):1-54 [PMID: 29456270]
  33. Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):862-7 [PMID: 24855262]
  34. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62 [PMID: 12916575]
  35. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):417-22 [PMID: 21942377]
  36. Labour Econ. 2012 Aug 1;19(4):451-464 [PMID: 23559694]
  37. Am Psychol. 1973 Jan;28(1):1-14 [PMID: 4684069]
  38. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:53-85 [PMID: 18798706]
  39. Biol Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;18(7):753-62 [PMID: 6615936]
  40. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:173-202 [PMID: 20331363]
  41. Psychol Rev. 1994 Apr;101(2):211-21 [PMID: 8022956]

MeSH Term

Humans
Emotional Regulation
Entrepreneurship
Emotions
Empathy
Students

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0impactprogramssocio-emotionalgentrepreneurshipprogramkeyskillsoutcomesRCTdataneuro-psychologicalfindsignificantmarkersproxystimuliRecentevidenceshowstargetingdimensionsentrepreneurship-eresiliencepersonalinitiativeempathy-arehighlycorrelatedsuccessalongbusinessmetricssalessurvivalnarrowtechnicalbent-eaccountingfinancearguedesignedfostereffectiveimprovingimprovestudents'abilityregulateemotionsenhanceindividuals'dispositionmakemeasuredrationaldecisionstesthypothesisstudyingrandomizedcontrolledtrialID:AEARCTR-0000916Chilecombineadministrativesurveyslab-in-the-fieldmeasurementsmethodologicalcontributionstudyuseelectroencephalogramEEGquantifyemotionalresponsespositiveeducationallinefindingsstudiesliteratureself-reportedmeasuresegritlocuscontrolcreativitynovelinsightcomesfindingneurophysiologicaldecreasingarousalalertnessvalencewithdrawalapproachabilityeventchangesnegativeNeurophysiologicalemotionregulationpredictefficacyeducation

Similar Articles

Cited By